I read somewhere about a European Philosopher, I forgotten his name who said, "If an ant is able to imagine its God, then it can establish Mega or Giant ant with 10 thousand legs and 10 thousand tentacles, as its God. It can praise such Giant ant and fabricate the stories of such Giant ant as epics."
It may be true. We don't know whether an ant has such imagination power or not. The ants may establish their own Giant ant God, they may be praising him, and they may be sparing some place to their God to devote, in their anthills. They may have their own epic stories in their ant language, who knows?
Recently our bio scientists had identified that dolphins has their own language, they are capable to keep names to identify dolphins individually and they have their own communication system. There is same case with tigers, elephants and some birds. Among the communication system of some animals, such as sound waves etc, we can't hear with our ears.
That's why we must accept that our knowledge and our capacity of senses are limited. Hence, we must accept & respect the Giant ant concept of ants.
Similarly, we must accept and respect the Jew's jewonism or Zoroastrianism. We must accept and respect the Christian's Christianity. We must accept and respect Muslims' Islam, as well, we must accept and respect, Hindus Hinduism. But a coup was planned; implemented on Hinduism to destroy it, to degrade it, to unpopular it and to ruin it. May be some other religions in this world are facing the same coup.
I'll try to illustrate this coup at my level best. In fact, this coup is still implementing on not only Hindu religion, but also it is on Indian culture, Indian life style, Indian arts, politics etc all fields and totally, it is on humanity and idealism.
I'll try to explain the coup, the motive of the coup, and the persons behind the coup. I try to establish the mode of implementation of the coup, under different captions.
Here I discuss about Indian epics. The epics are the stories of God. In fact, 'God is the concept for which belief is the base. A detailed description and discussion about this concept is under the caption of COUP ON HINDUISM AND OTHER RELIGIONS.
When the belief is the base of the concept of God, then how can anybody prove it like scientific concepts? In fact, some astronomical concepts like the beginning of this universe such as 'Big Bang theory' or 'As it is theory' are also based on belief only. This is because our knowledge is limited to verify or to identify the range of this universe. Its time and space are beyond the limits of our lifetime and vision.
In this context of belief, I narrate you some small stories which were told by Sri Rama Krishna Param Hamsa.
అనగా అనగా..........
Once there was a Guru, i.e. teacher, running a Gurukulam. He had many disciples in his Ashram. Among them, one disciple was very obedient and sincere towards the Guru. He had strong belief on his Guru.
One day, the Guru had gone to have bath in the river. At that time, this disciple was on the other side of the river. The Guru called him to come to him. The disciple didn't wait for the boat. He started walking on the water of the river, by chanting the name of 'Guru'.
The Guru felt so proud with the magic power of his disciple. He thought, "When my name has such magic power, I myself must have much more than it. Let me walk on the water."
He tried to walk on the water by chanting himself as "My self …My self".
He drowned in water and died
Such are the energies of belief and ego.
That's the entire story.
In this story, the disciple had belief on his Guru. He trusted in his Guru's name. It made him to overcome the problem. In the same case, we used to overcome our problems by trusting in God. It is the most common experience of most of the people. An atheist can argue with us as, "If you don't keep belief on God, also you can overcome the problems. It's the magic of your mind, not of God. Because there is no God". Then we can reply them as "May it is the magic of our mind, you believe that God is no where and we believe that God is now here. When we both are based on the same base i.e. belief, there is no meaning in argument."
Any way, in the above story, the disciple was obedient where as the Guru was egoistic. He felt ego and proud about himself so that he had fallen in the water.
I'll narrate another story told by Sri Rama Krishna Param Hamsa in the same context of belief. I read this in Sri Rama Krishna Bodhamrutham.
అనగా అనగా..........
Once there was an innocent man in a village. One day on some work, he was going to the nearby village. On the way, he had to cross a small river. He feared to cross the river. There came a Saint. This innocent man prayed the Saint to help him to cross the river. The Saint had given a 'Thaveedu' i.e. a copper thin sheet on which a magic word would be written and folded in to small size and said "My dear boy, Hold this Thaveedu in your hand and chant, 'Sri Rama….Sri Rama…' and cross the river. You can swim in the water".
The innocent man thanked the Saint and the Saint went on his way. The innocent man started to chant, 'Sri Rama….Sri Rama', wonder! He was able to swim in water. He was so happy. When he crossed half of the width of the river, he got curiosity to see what was the magic word, written on the 'Thaveedu! Then he opened the copper sheet. There was written Sri Rama. When he read it, he thought "Only Sri Rama! Not any magic word."
By the moment itself, he sank in the water.
That's the entire story.
In this story, the innocent man didn't sink in the water until he had belief on 'Thaveedu' and chanting of Sri Rama's name. Whenever he got doubt on it, he sank in the water. We used to have similar experiences in our life. Whenever we loss trust on God or whenever we loss self-confidence we used to fail in our effort.
Being Hindus, we believe that self-confidence is confidence on God. అహంబ్రహ్మస్మిః
As living beings, we are Atma and the God is Paramatma. God is in us and we are in God. Sri Bhagavad Geetha clearly tells us this.
I want to narrate another reference of Sri Rama Krishna Param hamsa. This also, I read in Sri Rama Krishna Bhodhamrutham. As per that,
In Sri Ramayana, Sri Anjeneya had jumped over the 100 Yojanas distance ocean to reach Sri Lanka, by trusting on the Name of Sri Rama. But Sri Rama himself needed the bridge to cross the ocean. That is the power of belief. The devotee can do miracles by trusting in God, where as God, he needs devotees to establish this.
Indian culture, Indian life style, Indian epics make the people to trust in righteous and to believe in morality. By demolishing this Indian culture, Indian life style, and Indian epics, the coup makers made the people and still making the people to trust in bad, to believe in immorality. All our epics motivate the people to be with positive thinking. By destroying the epics, by criticizing the epics, by making jokes on the epics, the coup makers, i.e. C.I.A., I.S.I. and Mr. Ramoji Rao successfully motivated the Indian to be with negative thinking.
I'll explain it in detail.
There is a famous story of the king Harithschandra in Sri Ramayana. He was famous as Satya Harithschandra. To avoid saying lie, he sacrificed his kingdom, his wealth, wife, his son, his life and himself. He didn't melobon to say lie, even, when he received the dead body of his own son. He got ready to cut his wife's head to perform his duty. In any difficulties, at any time he didn't give up the nature of telling truth. This story motivated Mohan Gandhi to turn as Mahatma Gandhi. People used to get motivation and spirits from epics to practice truthful life, to tell truth always. In Sri Rama Navami and other festival celebrations time, I watched that villagers and all sections of people used to get mesmerized while watching the poetic Drama of Satya Harichandra.
On such epic story, in between the years 1975 to 1992, pakka propaganda had implemented by the coup makers. In movies, in weeklies, in literature and in other related programs, a joke had popularized as follows:
Teacher: Children! What do you understand by the story of Satya HarithsChandra?
Children: we have to face many difficulties by saying truth.
Or
Father: Dear Ramu! What did you know by the story of Satya HarithsChandra?
Son: It is better to avoid telling truth. Otherwise, we have to face many problems.
The same joke in different forms was on propaganda until it reached to all sections of the people.
No journal of any media companies had published, no Columnist, no Journalist had written a single essay that, because HarithsChandra told truth, he was still alive in our hearts as Satya HarithsChandra. No intellectual like the one Kula Deep Nayyar, or A.G. Noorani or Nakkeeran Gopalan or N.Ram or Rama Chandra Guha etc. etc. had presented an argument, as there were thousands of kings lived and died, among them Hari Chandra only had given guidance to us.
Not a single Newspaper, not a single weakly had reminded the people, that the story of Satya HarithsChandra made an ordinary boy as our father of Nation. Moreover, so many satires were there in movies. For example, I quote a film song, I don't know the name of the Telugu movie in which this song was inserted, but Smt. P. Suseela sung it. It was
పల్లవి:
అదేమిటో! ఆడదంటే మగవాడికి అలుసులే
అనాదిగా జరుగుతున్నా అన్యాయం ఇదిలే
చరణం:
ఆలిని అమ్మాడొకడు
అడవికి పంపాడొకడు
ఒకడేమో జూదంలో పందెం ఓడ్డాడు ..... అదేమిటో"
That means:
What a strange! Men are careless to women.
Since ancient times, this is the in-justice happening.
One man had sold his wife.
One man had sent his wife to forest
And one man had gambled his wife.
In the first line of the stanza, the writer referred that Satya HarithsChandra sold his wife Chandra Mati Devi. He put such satire by equalizing Satya HarithsChandra to the liquor addicts who are ill-treating their wives by selling them, and to the worst, immoral men who are selling the women to prostitute houses. He didn't remind that Chandra Mati Devi, willing fully, accompanied her husband HarithsChandra, supported him, motivated him to stand for truth and she, her self-stood to speak truth.
In the second line of the stanza, in this song, the writer referred that Sri Rama sent his wife Sita to forest. He put such satire as if Sri Rama sent Sita to forest for himself. Did Sri Rama enjoy life with another woman or with another marriage after sending Sita to forest? To keep the moral values, both Sri Rama and Sita had sacrificed their lives. To use tongue without limits, without knowing a things is a big mistake and a washer man in Uttara Ramayanam did such mistake. But for the sake of a moral, poor washer man's blame, both Sri Rama and Sita felt
Responsible and afforded to maintain moral values in the society, By the way they sent righteous signals into the society. The writer of the above song didn't consider it. Similar reference is there in the case of Dharma Raja in the third line of the stanza of the song.
I don't know who had written this lyric, who had acted for this, who had directed this film, but it is clear that the motive force or Godfathers are Mr. Ramoji Rao and his agencies only. In the beginning, his activities were far behind the screen, very indirectly. Gradually his Godfather ship is established. This had taken decades of long time. It is quite natural in spying history to plan, to implement, and to wait, for result for such long time as decades and sometimes as centuries.
Not only this type of songs, such screens, such stories, such arguments, such jokes in movies, in News items, in literature and where ever it is possible had propagated until they change the attitude of public from positive thinking to negative thinking, from good to bad, from patience to revenge, from love, co-operation, and co-ordination to hatred. This is the slow poison of spying.
Otherwise, vigorous protest will happen if one Salmon Rashdi or one Thaslima Nasrin writes against Islam. Fatwa's will release to kill such critic making writers. Nobody will critic on any concept of Christianity and on any other religion. Then why Hinduism became such a cheap or easy approach to make jokes, critics and satires?
The argument of coup supporters on this is - "Hindus are not ferocious, they didn't mind their religion. They didn't respect their religion. So they are not making protest to protect their religion and epics. Look. All the critic makers or satires makers are Hindus only. Not any other religion people or Ramoji Rao or C.I.A. or I.S.I."
In reply, I give you an example. Suppose a family consists of 10 members including two grandparents, two parents and six children. Suppose the elders were leading life with moral values, human values, and professional ethics and idealistic views. Suppose a coup had planned and implemented to break them and to turn them into materialistic or commercial attitude. In the part of that coup, imagine that the family had driven into such a situation of decreasing of the income and increasing of expenditure. After some time, the children in that family would feel in-satisfaction on their parents, because their character did not completely form, because they were immature children, because their attitude did not completely form. Basically, human desires are unlimited. But resources to fulfill the desires are limited. This is the first word of economics. In such case, it was not in-natural that the children and youth to feel in-satisfaction on their elders of the family. If such deficiency of wealth drives them up to poverty and fasting, definitely hunger could drive them to oppose the elder's idealism. As a catalyst to this, if all the neighbors of that family, brain wash the children and youth of that family as in the story of Nalla Meka and Naluguru Dongalu i.e. BLACK GOAT AND FOUR THIEVES , in such a way "Look all others are in progress. They are happy. They are rich. Only your family is poor. Your parents and grandparents are idealistic and idiotic. The days are changed. Idealism is not suitable to these days. To talk about morals is good to hear, but not good to practice. Poverty is the only result of that attitude. Morals, Epics, history, fear to sin etc all are trash. Disobey your parents. They are particular about their own fame as moral people or truth saying people etc etc but not considering your happiness and comfortableity in life and your career. Like that, they are selfish. Selfishness means not only in terms of money and material, it may be in terms of feelings also. And more over your parents and elders are egoistic. That's why they are not hearing your version. This is the generation gap, their lack of communication skills. Your elders are not capacitive to understand this development. Hence, you neglect them. Don't respect them."
Then what will happen? Then some of the family members will become as the supporters to the neighbors. They support the coup. They participate in the coup and they effort to implement it. Ultimately, the family will collapse.
More over, if all the neighbors earning money and leading rich life, definitely the children and youth of the family get attract towards the neighbors only. In the part of the coup, if the neighbors introduce deviations among the family members as quarrels among men and women, old generation and young generation, among earners and non earners, among employees and non employees etc. all sections, then what will happen? Definitely all the family members will pierce their own eyes with their own fingers. When all the family members became blind, then it will be easy to exploit them. Then it will become easy to utilize their manpower, with nominal payment. Then it will become easy to encroach their assets, to snatch their worthy things. By that time, though the family became poor, but if their thinking ability, their working ability and their capacities are high, then it will be easy to create wealth by exploiting them.
This is the example.
Actually, family is the basic unit of the society. Certain families form colony. Certain colonies form villages, towns and cities. Certain villages, towns, and cities form states and states form country.
In the above example, family stands for country India and Hindus. The members of family stand for different sections of people. The neighbors stand for coup makers i.e. Ramoji Rao, media, C.I.A. and I.S.I. Media, literature, arts and movies of modern age did the brainwash.
The same type of coup may be implementing on several parts of the world by some other persons and same spying agencies. Whatever may be the coup makers and whatever may be the mode of coup, but the purpose of coup is only driving the people out of feelings and making them as commercial minded robots. Then it will be easy for these coup makers to convert the skills in to wealth, without investing much.
The decades of coup, history is this much simple. That's why only, some of our politicians like Chandra Babu Naidu will say to eliminate history subject from the educational syllabi of our children. If we study history, we may alert to identify the coup on us, or we may remind our heritage or we may realize our position. If history is deleted from, society, then we can't learn lessons from our history, we can't refer solutions for our present problems in the history and we can't use our elder's experiences. Then how much easy it will become to implement and to continue the implementation of the coup? Otherwise, why should the history get delete from the syllabi? In the part of the coup on our Nation, if this much of effort had taken to delete history from society, then imagine how much effort could taken by them to demolish or to degrade our epics?
Once again, I refer the story of Satya HarithsChandra. Suppose there is a society with 100 members. If 100 members of it are telling always truth, there will be peace in the society. Everybody will enjoy the advantages. If 90 members of it are telling always truth and 10 members are telling lies, then 10 members will have advantages, because 90% of people will believe that these 10% also telling truth like themselves. If 10 members of it are telling always truth and 90 members are telling lies, then 10 members will have disadvantages, because 90% of people won't believe these 10%, by thinking that these 10% also telling lies like themselves. If 100 members of the society are telling always lies, there will be horrified situation in the society. There won't be peace and happiness in the society. It resembles just like the following example…..Imagine a group of people standing in a circle. If everybody beats on cheek of his/her neighbors, everybody will suffer. The lie, the cheat, the deceive; the bad act is like the beat on cheek. Thus, everybody should suffer. Now we are living in such society. Who made us like this? Who drove us in to this situation? No doubt, there is a coup; however, we ourselves have driven us into this hell.
If a cheat happens, if a deceive happens, if a coup happens, it involves the cleverness or crookedness of the person who cheated or deceived the other as well as the foolishness of the person who was cheated or deceived by the other.
That's why I'm saying that, we, being Indians, we helped and co-operated to the coup makers to spoil our lives, to spoil our society, to spoil our children and to destroy our future.
Now I will explain the coup implemented to degrade our epics to inpatronise our epics in detail.
In fact, Hindu religion, Hindu epics are idealistic. All other religions in this world may be idealistic. Actually Hindu religion is not a religion. It is a life style. It is an idealistic attitude. It is a moral thinking. It is a systematic working nature. To break such systematism, to change such moral thinking into immoral, to pollute such idealistic attitude, to destroy such life style, a long and full pledged coup is under implementation since decades by Mr. Ramoji Rao and his spying agencies i.e. C.I.A. of America and I.S.I. of Pakistan.
Actually Sri Ramayanam, Sri Maha Bharatam are not only two epics of Indian culture, they are like two eyes of Indians. Here I use Indian culture instead of Hindu culture because it is the attitude of people in India irrespective of religion. Irrespective of religion, here in India, people believe in the concept of 'fate'. That's why I used Indian instead of Hindu. The theory of fate is in Indian blood, in Indian geans. Thousands of years back, here in India, there was no other religion such as Christianity or Islam etc. the fore fore fore…. Fathers of all people have same geans i.e. Indian geans. Such that their attitude, as in heritage have such believes on faith and truth. Because of such in heritage, all Indians have the characteristic of peace and patience. Among Muslims, Indian Muslims are different. Indian Muslims are with more human and moral values while compare with other country Muslims. That's why only Arab Muslims exploited Indian Muslims i.e. shakes but Indian Muslims didn't exploit any other country Muslim. Here, I'm refereeing the word 'Indian Muslim' for an ordinary Muslim citizen of India. But not a M.I.M. Party politician, but not a Mullah who could issue fatwa to kill people, but not an Imam Bukari who could raise communal rivals, but not a terrorist of old city of Hyderabad who could give shelter and co-operation to Pak., Bangladesh or Afghan terrorist to blast bombs. All these are supporters of coup makers i.e. Ramoji Rao, C.I.A. and I.S.I. Under the caption of COUP OF HINDU RELIGION AND OTHER RELIGIONS IN INDIA; I can discuss in detail regarding this angle of the coup including Hindu terrorists i.e. B.J.P., Sangh Pariwar, and R.S.S. etc.
Now I return to the point of India epics. In comparison, or in symbolic explanation, the two great Indian epics i.e. Sri Ramayanam, Sri Maha Bharatam are like the two eyes of human being in India. People could see in to the world, and in to their life through the vision of these two epics. Sri Bhagawatham is like their heart. They could feel everything through the emotional touch of 'Krishna Leela' i.e. Miracle of God. Vedic Literature is like the brain of the Indian. They could think and recognize the world and the life through the vision of that knowledge only. And totally, Sri Bhagavad Geetha is like the soul of the Indian. It is permanent ant it is the base of their life. Knowingly or unknowingly, it is the entire structure of their life. Awaritively or un-awaritively it is the style of their life and it is the philosophy of their life.
That's why only, the coup makers had concentrated on the epics at their maximum level. I start my discussion on this coup with Sri Ramayanam.
As per Sri Ramayanam, Sri Rama belonged to Surya Vamsam i.e. race. His fore fathers were Ikswaku, Manuvu and Satya HarithsChandra etc great kings. They were the followers of Dharma, truth and sincerity. Regarding Satya HarithsChandra, as I discussed is the beginning of this topic, some jokes were made and popularized until the anti spirit or until the idea of 'if we tell truth, we have to suffer like anything' up to the roots of all sections of the public. Hence, a great story, a great fact, a great episode that was able to motive people to tell truth, which was able to inspirit people to practice the morals, was deleted from society. This is because; the story of Satya Harithschandra had motivated Bapu to tell truth. It made a normal man in to strong soul i.e. Mahatma. That is the main reason to demolish that story from the public life. The 'Surabhi' poetic Drama Company and other art societies, which were exhibiting the real story of Satya HarithsChandra and other epic stories as dramas with Telugu poems and dialogues, had strategically made to collapse by the coup makers.
In fact, in the story of Satya HarithsChandra, his wife Chandra Mati Devi, being queen, she left all the wealth, kingdom and followed her husband to forest, to Kasi city in the part of following the truth and Dharma. Whenever HarithsChandra lost courage and fell in depression, she motivated him to follow the righteous way. His son Lohithasya also, being child, he followed his parents. The poems of such characters, though the lyric is classical with Grammatik values, villagers could understand the high level of language. Now such capacity is lapsed in city people and in villagers.
Thus, total family was stubborn to follow moral values and truth. It leads people to support their family members with unity whenever they fell in troubles. With the memories of such stories, wives could remember their responsibility to support their husbands in difficulties.
On such story, satires, jokes, critics had made. Wontedly media didn't give space to the voice of scholars, righteous people, and intellectuals like Usha Sri, Viswanadha Satya Narayana and others, the then responsible people who tried to support the story. Strategically the media including News paper, weeklies, periodicals, movies, conferences, discussions and with government officials indirect support [this they managed with corruption] had given full space to the voice of people like Ranganayakamma who criticized the story.
There is same case with other epic stories. In case of Sri Ramayanam ….. Regarding King Dasaratha, he ruled his country in righteous way and brought up his four children Sri Rama, Lakshmana, Bharatha and Satrughna in righteous way. He made them to learn how to respect parents and elders, how to practice morals, how to face the difficulties, and to obedience towards teachers. Since childhood, Rama, Lakshmana, Bharatha and Satrugna had shown nice behavior. Among them Sri Rama was more attractive, obedient, knowledgeous and with sweet talkative. Naturally, people, other characters in the story had praised him. Poet Valmiki Maharishi described this in a poetic way.
By referring this, the authoress of Ramayana Visha Vruksham, Ranga Nayakamma and other persons like her put several critics. She said that with such praising of Sri Rama by other characters, Valmiki Maharishi had done mass hypnotism or brainwash to give hero image or great image to Sri Rama, and in fact Sri Rama was not that much good.
Actually, Valmiki Maharishi didn't give publicity, advertisements to make hit his writing. He didn't make marketing campaigns to popular his Ramayanam. More over Sri Rama also didn't effort such. He didn't praise himself. He didn't purchased awards, rewards such as Padma Sri or lifetime achievement or legend etc. He didn't paid money to perform honor in Ravindra Bharathi or in Lalita Kala Thoranam in public Gardens. Both Valmiki Maharishi and Sri Rama didn't follow strategy, which the God fathers in cinema field i.e. coup makers are following to popular Amita Batchan as big B and to popular Rajani Kanth as Tamil super star and Chiranjeevi as Telugu Mega Star. Both Valmiki Maharishi and Sri Rama didn't follow the policy of 'you scratch my back and I scratch your back' as the cinema people. I refer Satyajit Ray's compliment towards the heroine Jaya Prada as the beautiful heroine of the then days and Asia Journal's ranking of Bipasa basu as the sexiest woman of Asia. Why I refer these incidents is this type of publicity is with match fixing arrangements. Both Valmiki Maharishi and Sri Rama didn't use the media to declare that they had a light with them. Without the media approach, people could observe the light, so that people had accepted the good qualities of them. Actually present days are not comparable with the days of Ramayanam and the Ramayanam time is not comparable with present time. In spite of this, why I put such satire is as follows.
Mr. Karuna nidhi, the present Chief Minister of Tamilnadu is saying with critic regarding Rama Sethu as "Rama sethu is the Natural formed one, but not constructed by Rama as a bridge to Lanka. In fact, no person by name Rama was born. The story of Ramayana is only imagination of poet. Where he born? When he born? Where he studied? When he studied? Did he study Engineering? He did Engineering to construct a bridge from India to Lanka in which University?"
In India, now, it is possible to get fake passports to ordinary woman by name of wife of respected M.P. or M.L.A. In India, now, it is possible to get fake driving license, passports to terrorist and to one person by name of different persons, not only one passport, it is possible to get multiple passports to one person. In India, now, it is possible to get state first ranks, distinctions to students who do not know the definitions in basic subjects. Just we need money to give as corruption to concern authorities. Then is it impossible to get Engineering certificates for Sri Rama, Lakshmana, Sugreeva, Hanuman, Nal and Neel from any university in Tamil Nadu or in Andhra Pradesh or in India?
Keep this point beside. Whether Sri Rama was alive at once upon a time or not, whether Sri Rama was imaginary character of poet or not, whether he constructed a bridge really or not, whether the present Rama sethu [on which B.J.P. is planning to play a drama as in the case of Rama Janma Bhoomi of Ayodhya, U.P.] is the natural formation or not, but the belief of crores of Hindus or Indians is true. Won't Mr. Karuna nidhi, or Union India Government show respect and consideration on the feeling i.e. Manobhavas of Indians? Won't Indians or Hindus have feelings? Won't they get hurt of the feelings like Sikhs in the events of 1984, after the assassination of Smt. Indira Gandhi at New Delhi or like other religious people in India? Mr. Kula Deep Nayyar, who is showing the great concern regarding the hurting of feelings of Sikhs since 23 years, can't show a little bit of same concern towards the hurting of the feelings of the Hindus in the case of Rama Sethu? Won't Hindus have feelings? Or won't Hindus have hurt of the feelings? Is it not showing a systematic implementation of a coup on Hindus? Otherwise, can Mr. Karuna nidhi or others make such type of comments on any other religious aspects, on any other religion prophets or on any other religious believes? Why Hindus are that much easy approach to them? Who is giving such support to them to criticize Hinduism, to make satires on Hindu believes and to make jokes on Hindus? Without doubt, it is the support from Mr. Ramoji Rao, and his agencies C.I.A. and I.S.I.
Let us return to Sri Ramayanam and to king Dasaratha. Being king, he was successful and made his sons with full pledged personality and characters. He was a successful father in bringing up his children in perfect way. He made them as responsible citizens. That's why the younger brothers obeyed and respected their elder, Sri Rama. All of the obeyed and respected their father and mother. They didn't played coup to snatch the thrown from their father or among the brothers like Aurangzeb in the case of Shah Jahan and his sons.
40 to 50 years back, parents and elders in the family used to refer Ramayanam follow Ramayanam and used to tell the stories to the children in the family. They used to get motivation to follow the morals of epics. That's why only such generation people used to respect their elders. Now, if you watch the present young generation and children in our society, no child is calling his/her elder child as brother or sister. They are calling them by name. When the elders and parents of the family, call their children by name or pet name, the younger children also imitate it. By that time parents should correct them and should make them to respect, elder children as well as they should make the elder children to be responsible and affectionate towards the young children. Because of delete of epics such as Ramayanam and Maha Bharatham, people had forgotten that discipline. The parents are laughing when the young children call their elder children by name as imitating the parents. The parents are thinking that such imitating is naughtiness of children and enjoying it. They are not noticing that such acts are the beginning steps of indiscipline and decreasing of bondages and values in the society. Hence, result is in front of our eyes. Now brothers & sisters born to one mother are killing other own brothers, sisters and their family members. Where is the address of love and bondage? Maximum people became as Aurangzeb's.
In Ramayanam, Lakshmana scarified his comfortable life, company of his young wife for 14years to accompany and to serve his elder brother Sri Rama in forest. Bharatha scarified his thrown, which his mother Kaika Devi achieved with her boons. He said that he was not capable and eligible for it and given the thrown to Sri Rama, his elder brother with respects. Being kings, having busy schedule of life, king Dasaratha and his wives had brought up their children with such moral values. Now, are the modern mothers and fathers busy than the king Dasaratha and his wives who spent enough time to perform all of their duties and works being King and Queens? Are the modern parents having much busy schedule than them? Or, are the modern parents have to perform much politics than them?
More over the modern parents are very much advanced. Among them, I had seen some of the fathers who are enjoying the naughtiness of their sons by making the sons to call the fathers as "Orai Daddy." When the son is at the age of below ten years, it may be okay for them, but if the sons call them at the age of 25, is it okay for them? If the son disobeys, does not show respects and send them to old age homes, is it okay for them?
Indian Epics, Vedic culture leads the people to follows,
Mathru Devo Bhava that means Mother is God.
Pithru Devo Bhava that means Father is God.
Acharya Devo Bhava that means Teacher is God.
By saying God bye to epics and culture from life, from society and by welcoming the T.V. serials, 'mass' i.e. vulgar movies in to life and society, the children will follow.
Mother is a servant to us.
Father is a cashier to us.
And teacher is a useless fellow to us.
In most of the families, among most of the children, this type of indiscipline and disobedience is there. By stopping our running or busy schedule and if we observe the facts with consciousness, this appears around us in the society and families.
In this context, I want to explain you another point, which can demo you regarding the implementation of the coup on Indian culture. By spreading critics, satires and jokes including the writings like Ramayana Visha Vrukshams, the coup makers degraded the epics and driving them from public life. More over there was a spread or propaganda, regarding Aurangzeb, the last fame Emperor of Mughal. His hairs were unpopular and weakened. After Aurangzeb, as per the history, the Mughal Kingdom got stage of falling down. Regarding such Aurangzeb, the oral propaganda was that, Aurangzeb did not enjoy the people money as Emperor, he used to copy the Koran by manual script, by selling them, and he earned money for his food. He spent such loyal or Saint life. Because Shah Jahan had spent public money to construct Taj Mahal, Aurangzeb did not like this, hence he kept his father in the royal prison i.e. prison in the palace!
This was the oral palm plate in spread in public. In fact, Shah Jahan constructed Taj Mahal as the symbol of his love to his wife Muntaj Begum. However, both Muntaj and Shah Jahan had failed to construct the character of their son Aurangzeb. That's why only Aurangzeb did not respect the bondage of his father. Might Aurangzeb not believe the bondages?
With such character, could Aurangzeb led his life like a saint, without royal luxuries, with his own and poor earnings on copy writing the Koran with his own hands? As per history, Aurangzeb had restarted the tax on beard & hair on Hindus, which his great grandfather Akbar had demolished. He was that much greedy and impatient to other religions. He didn't have affection on his own blood relatives.
Giving positive image to much Mughal i.e. Muslim Emperor, Aurangzeb and giving negative image of king Dasaratha and Kausalya who were successful parents in carving the morality in the characters of their sons, Sri Rama and his brothers, is it not a coup on Indian culture?
In practice, the definition of secularism became as the praising of others religions, protecting of other religions especially Islam and criticizing Hinduism, damaging Hinduism. By keeping this point on the shoulders, B.J.P., R.S.S. etc. entered in to the field with roarings and shoutings, raised Hindu terrorism. This is another angle of coup. I will explain it in detail and under the caption of COUP ON HINDUISM AND OTHER RELIGIONS and under the caption of COUP ON INDIAN POLITICAL FIELD.
Let us return to Ramayanam again. The saint Viswamithra went to King Dasaratha to request him to send Sri Rama along with him to the forest to protect his Yagnam. In fact, he was king Gadheya before he took 'Sanyasam'. He had known the operation of many weapons and he gave his powers of weapons which he acquired with his own effort such as 'Thapasu' to Sri Rama for the sake of world peace and prosperous. Such capacitive ViswaMitra requested King Dasaratha to sent, Sri Rama with him. Vasishta Maharishi remarked this, when King Dasaradha feared to send Sri Rama to kill the demons and to protect the Yagna. When Dasaratha was ready to accompany Viswamithra, instead of Rama, Maharishi Vasishta said "Oh! King! Don't doubt the capacity of Viswamitra and Sri Rama. Viswamitra could kill the demons with a single curse. In spite of this, he is requesting you to send Sri Rama with him. His wish might be other. He wants to coach and train up Sri Rama. Send your son, along with him as if you are sending him to marriage instead of to forest. Being your family and race teacher, I'm advising you."
Because of this Vasishta Maharishi, Viswamitra had given up his Kingdom of Gadheya and he went to forest to do penance. Once, being king, Gadheya had gone to forest for hunting the animals. In those days, hunting the animals was the part of king's duty, because the number of wild animals and wideness of the forest was much than the population of people and their residential areas. So that the wild animals used to damage the public life by attacking on lives and crops in fields. That's why kings should go to forests along with their army to hunt the animals. But now hunting of the animals is crime because now increased popularity of people is attacking on the lives of wild animals and on the forests.
While returning from hunting, the king Gadheya had visited Vasishta Maharishi's Ashram. With the help of the cow Kapila, the daughter of Kamadhenu, Vasishta Maharishi had given a big feast to the King and his army. Gadheya felt wonder about it. He wanted to have the cow, but Vasishta rejected his desire. He forced to take the cow but failed. By the way, he could understand that the strength of king was less than that of a saint or Maharishi. He left his kingdom and started penance. In spite of this incident, Vasishta Maharishi didn't have any agony on Gadheya i.e. Viswamitra. And more over both Vasistha and Viswamitra respect each other. That was their achievement over the emotions, and arishadwargas. All the famed people and characters in our epics stood for such balance of mind and led people to be in such path.
Leaving all this good of Viswamitra, these coup makers and their supporters used to refer Menaka's relation with Viswamitra in movies like Yama Gola, Yama Donga etc. in jokes in cartoons. The background story is as follows. Being Gadheya, when he started penance to acquire the strength of a saint like Visishta Maharishi, he failed minimum thrice in that trail. Depends upon their concentration in penance, they will get powers and strength and such saints were used to call as Muni, Rushi, Maharishi, Mahamuni,Rajarshi and Brahmarshi etc names. Vasishta Maharishi was famous as Brahmarshi. Gadheya wanted to become equivalent to him. In that process, he became friend to this universe, so that he was called by name Vaswa Mitra. He was the man who behind the story of Satya HarithsChandra, one of the fore fathers of Sri Rama in Ramayanam. Viswamitra's role is valuable in Sri Rama's life. His grandson Bharatha was the one of the fore fathers of Pandavas in Mahabharatam such that he was long living man as per Hindu epics.
As I above said, during the time of penance, he failed to keep up his concentration without disturbance, minimum thrice.
In one trail, the beauty of Menaka, the divine woman sent by Devendra, the king of heaven to disturb his penance, influenced him. He loved her, spent with her. After she became pregnant, he could realize his deviation from his target and left her, gone to Himalayas. Menaka had given birth to Sakunthalaand she brought up by Kanva Maharishi. Sri Kali Dasu in Sanskrit fabricated the basic story of Sakunthala in most poetic and dramatic way in Abhignana Sakunthalam. On this episode, the cine people, the coup makers, made 'Masala' i.e. purposeful mixture, by leaving the greatness of ViswaMitra and by leaving his well wishing towards the peace and prosperity of this universe.
In other trail of penance, Viswamitra was influenced by ego, in the episode of TriSanku. In that story, Trisanku was a king. He was rejected to enter in to heaven. He approached Viswamitra and said "Maha Muni. I was rejected from heaven. No saint helped me including Vasishta Maharishi. Please help me" "Viswamitra felt egoistic and took the challenge. He wanted to prove himself greater than Vasishta Maharishi and others. By investing his strength of penance, he sent Trisanku to heaven. He was thrown from there. While falling down uprooted, Trisanku shouted "Viswamitra! I'm falling down, save me. You promised me to keep me in heaven." By investing his total strength of penance, Viswamitra created another heaven and kept Trisanku there.
Later, deities solved it by accepting Trisanku in to heaven. Such that again Viswamitra got disturbed and deviated from his target of becoming Brahmashi. On this episodes, the coup makers and their supporters argue that Viswamitra had run parallel systems of this universe's creating, continuation and destruction i.e. "సృష్టిస్థితిలయలు". By the way, Viswamitra was rebel and enequivalent to the now-a-days terrorists who are trying to run the parallel governments.
In another trial, Viswamitra was influenced by the jealousy and ego and lost his entire energy of penance. He wanted to know Brahma Vidya i.e. Atma Gnanam and to become Brahmarshi. He consulted great and fame persons and deities like Surya Deva etc to teach him Atma Vidya. According to their guidance, finally he approached Adi Seshu, the great Snake on which God Vishnu used to lay. He prayed Adi Seshu to teach him Atma Gnana. There was earth on Adi Seshu's hoofs. He said, "You are looking my stage. How can I teach you by carring this heavy earth on head? If I loss balance, it may fall down."
Viswamitra said, "Keep it aside for a while and teach me." Adi seshu said, "Can you keep it in balance and prevent it from falling off its orbit?"
Viswamitra said "Yes". Adi Seshu lifted the earth from his head and kept it a side. It started to fall with high velocity. With superiority complex, Viswamitra said, "I'm investing my penance energy of a moment to control the earth." But the earth didn't stop from falling. He said, "I'm investing my energy of one day." No use. He said, "I'm investing half of my penance power." No use, He said, "I'm investing my total energy of penance to stop". The earth had stopped for a moment i.e. second and again moving with high velocity. Viswamitra felt shy and realized how less his energy, how egoist he was and his position with respective arishadwargas. He said, "Please forgive me. I realized my ego." Adi Seshu smiled with generosity, stopped the earth, and kept it again on his head. On this episode, the coup makers and their supporters argue "By standing where, Viswamitra conversed like that with Adi Seshu".
Now we know that our scientists, astronauts like Kalpana Chavla, Suneetha Williams etc converse with NASA centre, by standing in the space. This is possible with science and technology. Then, in those days, might not it possible with some other technology or technology of Atma Gnana or Brahma Gnana? Is our knowledge is full pledged to say that there won't be knowledge other than what we know now?
In fact, these types of stories are there, all over the world, in all languages, in all countries, in all religions and in all folk stories. Can the coup makers comment on them like the comments, satires they passed on Hindu, Indian epics?
After, all these mistakes, Viswamitra concentrated on penance with balance of mind by leaving all ego & arishadwargas and achieved the darshanam i.e. appearance of Brahma Deva. When Brahma Deva gave boon to Viswamitra by calling him as Brahmarshi, he didn't satisfy. When Vashista Brahmarshi called him as 'Brahmarshi', he could satisfy and then he became as the friend of the universe.
Such Vasishta and Viswamitra, when they meet each other, they respect each other. It was not a Hippocratic act like our politicians meeting.
Let us return to the beginning story of Ramayanam. When King Dasaratha sent his sons, Sri Rama and Lakshman with Viswamitra, on the way Viswamitra taught so many philosophical and technical knowledge to Sri Rama and Lakshmana. When Tataki, the woman demon attacked them, Sri Rama felt doubt to kill a woman though it was bad demon. Then Viswamitra told him "Sri Rama. Don't suspect! Don't take back step to kill Tataki, by thinking that it is a woman. In fact, it is a bad demon. While performing our duty, while protecting Dharma, it must be our first priority than our fame or good name. In performing our duty, our Dharma, we have to scarify all of our personal things, feelings including the fame and good name even". Then Sri Rama killed her.
What a matured idealistic view is this? Now days, the modern people or advanced people are sacrifying all morals, values for the sake of personal favor such as escaping from their duties and works. With this much of immaturity and ignorance, the coup supporters like the authoress of Ramayana Visha Vrukshnam, Ranga Nayakamma, other cine poets and writers can't understand the idealism of Sri Ramayanam. ' It is quite natural. People who didn't experience the taste, smell of ghee can't know the taste and smell of ghee by reading and hearing about it.
On continuation of the story of Sri Ramayanam, Sri Rama and Lakshmana had protected the Yagna of Viswamitra Maharishi by killing Subahu, a son of Tataki and by driving away Maricha, another son of Tataki. After that, Viswamitra took them to VedehaRaja Sabha i.e. Midhila Nagaram. On the way, they came across Gautama Muni's ashram. There, when Sri Rama's foot touched a stone, it became as beautiful woman, Ahalya, wife of Gautama Mahamuni.
The background is as follows: - Ahalya, the beautiful daughter of Brahma deva was given to Gautama Maharishi, though Devendra requested Brahma Deva for her hand. One mid night, Devendra approached Gautama Maharishi's ashram, imitated a cock's cry as cook a doodle to cheat Gautama Maharishi. Believing it was time to wake up; Gautama Maharishi went to river to bath.
Devendra took the appearance of Gautama Maharishi, approached Ahalya on her bed. She knew that he was not Gautama Muni and he was Devandra. But she felt proud as Devendra desired her beauty and tempted to enjoy with him. They enjoyed sex. By the time, Devendra was taking leave from her; Gautama Muni had reached home and came to know what happened. He got angry and cursed Ahalya as "You lost balance of mind and tempted to do sin, i.e. to have sex with a man other than your husband. Be a stone. Whenever Sri Rama's foot that has good character, moral values, touches you, you will turn in to woman from the shape of stone. Then I'll join with you." By saying like this, he went to penance.
When Sri Rama's foot touched that stone, the curse of Ahalya got over and she took her body. She devoted Sri Rama as guest. Gauthama Maharishi came there by that moment, and accepted his wife. Both Ahalya, Gauthama Muni went on to penance. Being Maharishi, Gauthama excused his wife and accepted her. Because he was not a king like Sri Rama, he had such opportunity to excuse, his wife in spite of her temptation towards sin. Because he had, known how difficult to control the mind was. On the other hand, Sri Rama demanded Sita to prove herself after the death of Raavana. After the thrown at Ayodhya, he sacrificed Sita and sent her to forest by considering a drunken washer man's comments, though he knew about the purity and morality of his wife, Sita Devi. This was, because he was king. Being king, he had responsibility to be a role model to the people. After that, Sri Rama didn't marry any other woman and enjoyed the life. This much of moral values are there in Sri Ramayanam.
The similar type of excuse between wife and husband is referred in Ramayanam in the story of Renuka, Jamadagni Maharishi, the parents of Parasu Rama, who was considered as one of the 10 Avatars of God Vishnu. I will explain it later.
It is difficult to understand this high level of moral values by the so-called modern people and modern writers like Ranga Nayakamma and other supporters of coup on epics, because the modern people not know the bondage, love and affections. The maximum portion of such people are habituated to give diverse to one fellow today, dating on next day with other fellow, on next day dating with another, on next day remarriage with another, on next day diverse again and the process restarts. Then, such people, how they can understand the values in epics? However, the ordinary Indians, the villagers, the middle class or poor Indians are still able to understand those values. That's why only the coup makers and their supporters could not succeeded to destroy our culture in spite of coup of making satires, jokes on them. Only they could pollute the attitude of public. No doubt, it can be purify whenever people notice the coup. This is not my belief and not my confidence. It is the confidence on people, on human beings, on good, on faith, and on God.
In the context of Sita's marriage with Sri Rama, there was the establishment of capacity of the bridegroom by meeting the challenge of using Siva Dhanassu as per the condition put by the father of the bride, King Janaka. There were no Kanyasulkam or Vara Katnams i.e. payment of money for the girl or boy. This type of bad traditions such as Vara Katnam i.e. money to boy to marry our girl, or Kanyasulkam i.e. money to girl to get marry our boy and Sati Sahagamanam i.e. killing the wife on the fire of corpse of her dead husband, are patronized by cruel people, bad people and egoistic people in the society. For such bad traditions, we should not confine them to epics, and Vedic literature. I'll give detailed description of it under other captions. However, the coup makers, and coup supporters argue that the epics preach these bad traditions in human practices, which is 100% lie.
At the end of the celebrations of Sita Rama's marriage, and the marriages of Lakshmana, Bharatha and Sathrugna with the cousins of Sita Devi, Parasu Rama entered there. He was considered as the fore avatar to Sri Rama i.e. 6th Avatar of God Vishnu in his ten Avatars.
Jamadagni Maharishi and Renuka Devi were his parents. As per a story, one day in the afternoon, Jamadagni Maharishi was practicing arrow shooting from a bow. Renuka Devi was assisting him. It was hot. The Sun was burning in the sky. After some time Renuka Devi tired but didn't stop to assist her husband. Jamadagni Maharishi felt angry with God Sun by watching her tiredness. He got ready to shoot Sun God by arrow. Then Sun God appeared before him and said "Dear Jamadagni! It is my duty to burn in the sky. With my heat and light only, the living beings on the earth are getting food. I'm performing my work, so that, you should not be angry with me. However, I'm offering this umbrella and cheppals [shoe] to you to protect you and your wife from my heat. These will serve all human beings." Jamadagni felt happy. That much was his love and affection on his wife, Renuka Devi. This story might be original or prakshiptham, but there is no negative intuition in this story if it is imaginary one i.e. Prakshiptham.
Such Renuka Devi had habituated to go to river every day, make meditation there, with her purity power she used to make a pot with the sand on the bank of the river and bring water to Jamadagni Maharishi to perform his daily devotion to God. One day when she was bathing in the river, after meditation, she saw the image of a Gandharwa man travelling in sky in the river water. Just a moment she thought "What a handsome man!" Because she lost the concentration and control on mind, she was not able to make the sand pot to bring water. She returned ashram with empty hands. By knowing the truth, Jamadagni Maharishi called on his two elder sons and ordered them to kill Renuka Devi. They didn't obey their father's order to kill their own mother. By that time, Parasu Rama, the younger son of them returned from the forest. Jamadagni ordered him "Parasu Rama! Your mother had sinful thoughts. Kill her. Kill your elder brothers also. They disobeyed me. It is my order."
Immediately Parasu Rama killed the three. Jamadagni pleased with him and asked him to ask for a boon. He prayed his father "Father! Please excuse my mother and brothers. Give re-births them and accepts them."
With pleasure, Jamadagni had done so. He didn't leave Renuka Devi. When such Jamadagni Maharishi and his sons were killed by an egoistic king, Renuka Devi ordered him to kill all kings, and Kshatriyas on the earth to protect Dharma, because kings become proud, ego and immoral and they were harassing the weak people instead of protecting them. Parasu Rama followed her order and killed all Kshathriyas.
This Parasu Rama entered the marriage place of Sri Rama and Sita and said, "Who is Rama? Who had broken the Siva Danuvu i.e. bow of God Siva? Where is that egoistic Kshatriya?" When Sri Rama said, "I didn't break it. As per Kshatriya Dharma, I tried to use it. It had broken", Parasu Rama, challenged him to use Vishnu Dhanuvu. Sri Rama took it from his hand. When he realized that he was egoistic, he took leave from Sri Rama by declaring the truth of his own ego.
Thus, the great and fame characters, which were considered as the avatar of God Vishnu, whenever they undergo arishadwargas, they should face the result of it. Such is the concept of Indian epics.
According to this concept only, there is a story, about the relationship between Sri Rama and Lakshmana. In this life as Sri Rama Avatar in Tretha Yugam, God Vishnu was born as elder brother i.e. Sri Rama and Adi Seshu was born as Younger brother i.e. Lakshmana and served Sri Rama. That's why in the next life as Sri Krishna in Dwapara Yuga; God Vishnu was born as younger brother i.e. Sri Krishna and Adi Seshu was born as elder brother i.e. Bala Rama and Sri Krishna served his brother Bala Rama.
The similar relation was discussed regarding Sri Rama and Vaali. In thretha Yuga, Sri Rama killed Vaali by hiding himself behind a tree. Hence, in the next life in Dwapara Yugam, Vaali was born as Tribal hunting man, and killed Sri Krishna with an arrow by hiding himself behind a tree.
By this way, Indian epics indicate the people that we have to receive things as a result of which we had done. If we do well to others, we receive well from others in consecutive life. If we do bad to others, we receive bad from others. God even have no exception from this. This concept, this belief control the people from making bad and motivate them to do good.
In the context of Sri Rama pattabhishekam i.e. celebration making Sri Rama as king, the quarrel started among the servant maids of Kauisalya and Kaikeye, due to their emotions. Those were servant maids, the immature and ignorant, fourth class people. Among servant maids, among illiterate people, among fourth class people there may be psychological and philosophical maturity. But here in these servant maids of the queens, it was not there. Hence, due to their egos, they quarreled among themselves and ill-treated one another. When the servant maids of Kausalya ill-treated the servant maid of Kaika, Mandara as "Till date we obeyed you as you are the servant maid to Kaika Devi, and she is the dearest wife of the king. However, today onwards, Sri Rama will become as King. Our mistress Kausalya Devi will become as the mother of the king. So that, your priority among us is over. Next you have to obey us."
By hearing this, Mandara, the old woman, the servant maid of Kaika who accompanied her from her father's house, got angry. Because the brains of those servant maids were narrow, it was happened. But Mandhara didn't leave the matter of quarrel there. She carried it to Kaika Devi and raised her angry by polluting her brain. She said blames on king Dasaratha, Kowsalya and Sri Rama and raised doubts in her as if all of they were going to ill-treat her. Because of such brainwash, Kaika had forgotten the discretion, wisdom and bondages. Mandara reminded her about her boons. Hence, result was, Sri Rama, Sita and Lakshman's living in forest, death of King Dasaratha, her son Bharatha's grievance towards herself and the collapse of total life of Kingdom.
With the reference of the story of Mandara and Kaika, people could recognize the persons like Mandara and they could prevent such brainwash on themselves. After watching the life disaster of Kaika Devi by entertaining an immature servant maid's words, people could notice the terrible results of the acts, which they take without thinking properly. By demolishing such epics from society, from public life, it is easy for the coup makers to brain wash the people. Strategically and successfully, the coup makers had driven out the epics from modern people. Hence, result, we are watching as the increase of immorality in public life.
In the context of boons of Kaika Devi, I discussed under the caption of COUP ON PUBLIC ATTITUDE When Kaika Devi called on Sri Rama and informed him about her boons and King Dasaratha's acceptance to give thrown to Bharatha and to send Sri Rama to forest, Sri Rama received it as he received the information of celebration of thrown to him. It made no difference for him, to have thrown or to go to forest. Since thousands of years, Indians dream about this state of balance of mind i.e. Sthitha Pragnatha, as Sri Bhagavad Geetha preaches us. With selfishness, one stepmother of Sri Rama i.e. Kaika Devi demanded him to go to forest and to live there for 14 years. With love and affections another stepmother of Sri Rama i.e. Sumithra sent her own son Lakshmana to accompany Sri Rama, to support him and to serve him in the life in the forest. Such that Ramayanam tells us in which manner we should not be, and in which manner we should be. When Lakshmana got angry on Kaika Devi and got ready to kill her, Sri Rama cooled him by saying it was their duty to follow their father's word the sake of truth. Sri Rama and Lakshmana were capable to kill demons like Thataki and Subahu but they didn't use such capacity for their luxuries sake. They used it for the sake of peace and prosperity of world and Dharma.
The coup makers and their supporters strategically forgotten Sumithra Devi and her sacrifice and strategically, highlighted Kaika Devi and her selfishness. You can refer the critics on Ramayanam of that time i.e. before 40 to 50 years. The royal family of king Dasaratha didn't played coup to get thrown. They sacrificed their self-luxuries including thrown for the sake of truth. As per Indian epics, it was Thretha Yugam i.e. too past time. Next was Dwapara Yuga. In that Dwapara Yuga, Pandavas and Kaurawas were fought to get thrown. The Kaurawas played coups on pandavas. In the next Kaliyuga, such coups became general happenings in human life. In history, there were royal families who played coups, done wars to win the thrown, like Moghal families in Delhi, in Mouryas like Asoka, and in Pandya, Chola, in Rayala races in Vijayanagaram. Among them: whomever the kings afforded to do good to public got good place in public memory and history. For example, Chanda Ashoka, the son of Binbi Sara, who fought and killed his brothers and got the thrown. Because Dharma Ashoka after realizing the truth and Buddha Dharma, he occupied permanent place in the memory of public from generation to generation.
There was similar case with the Rayala race of Vijayanagaram and Nayaka race of Thanjavur. I can give detail description and discussion under the CAPTION OF POLITICS . The vice versa of this was regarding Aurangzeb, I had given explanation in the fore pages of this writing.
When we refer Sri Ramayanam again, Bharatha rejected his mother as punishment to her selfishness. He spent 14 years like a saint at Nandi village by leaving all the royal luxuries. Totally, the sons of King Dasaratha became as saints and King Dasaratha passed away, when Kaika entertained the jealousy of a servant maid. Up to that moment, the life of every member in the King's family, in the city of Ayodhya was cheerful and joyful. Within a moment, it was totally changed into utter sadness. In fact, a single moment is enough in our life to change happiness into sorrow, to change safe into danger. That's why, in Sri Bhagavad Geetha, Sri Krishna told us that "Among strong things, time is the strongest and it is me, the God." As a theory, Bhagavad Geetha establishes this and the wise people can absorb. Sri Ramayanam, Maha Bharatham establishes this as stories and all the people including wise and foolish, educated and un-educated can absorb it. By deleting epics from public attitude, they can forget this truth and can feel that themselves are more strong than time and any other. So that people can become egoistic, impractical and ignorant. To drive the human beings to this stage is the aim of coup makers i.e. Ramoji Rao, C.I.A, I.S.I. and their supporters.
Because of such coup only, now people are planning and implementing personal coups on all their surrounding people for the sake of business, promotions and little favors. Totally, immorality was increased like anything.
People had forgotten Sita Devi, who got ready to go to forest along with her husband to share his difficulties, by leaving royal luxuries. But now the modern women are getting ready to leave husbands when they are in failure or when they are in difficulties. Both men and women have forgotten to share the difficulties of each other. They are particular to enjoy the advantages only. I'm not saying all of the people are like this.
But the percentage of such people was increased now, when compared with that, with the time when the epics were patronized by the society. The rate of divorce is demo for it.
Actually, the epics had served the purpose of psychologist, psychiatrists and family consultants. The epic stories had given counseling to people to design their life style in those days. Now by paying high money as fee, we are purchasing the counseling from experts. How much change in business? Regarding corporate medicine and corporate commissions, you read under the caption 'MEDICINE.'
At Chitra Kuta Parvatha i.e. the mountain by name Chitra Kuta, Sita & Rama were enjoying the beauty and peacefulness of the forest. Being loving wife and husband, they were enjoying each other's company. They were enjoying the friendship among them with leisure. In royal palace, it was a rare opportunity to them to have such leisure in their busy life. But here, they were enjoying the time.
I suspect that most of the modern people cannot understand this feeling and experience just like in the ghee example. ' We must have the experience of enjoying the nature, leisure and loving one's company to understand this. And one more surprising thing I want to explain to you. You can experience this in your selves and in your neighbors. Being self-experienced person, I am explaining it to you. Whenever we have desire towards something, it won't be available to us. Whenever we do not desire it, it will follow us. It may be the miracle of God to make us to learn the truth.
In fact, this is not pessimism. If anybody argues that this is pessimistic view rather than philosophical fact, I put a 'Namaskar' to them. Because I'm the most optimistic person and I'm that much optimistic to hope all the coup supporters can nullify their bad intuitions and all the coup makers can practice morals, truth and good in near future.
Well, in Ramayanam, when Bharatha approached Sri Rama in forest to offer the thrown, Lakshmana mistook it as attempt to war. Sri Rama stopped him and advice him to control his temper. During the residing time in forest, Sri Rama killed demons like Khara Dhushan etc along with their followers more than ten thousand in number. The authoress of Ramayana Visha Vruksham, Ranga Nayakamma and others like her, argued that this act was ill legal and anti Dharma. All the poets, writers had given that good fame to Rama. To gain such popularity, Rama had done such. Because, he had the technology of arrows, he could kill the demons. She argued like this as if we say that Rama done dharma then we must say that British done Dharma, because British, East India Company had encroached the India in 19th Century with their technology of gun.
In fact, Sri Rama and East India Company were not comparable. Because Sri Rama fought with demons and the demons had more technologies of weapons like Maya Yudha and Khara, Raavana etc demons attempted violence on Sita and other saints. That to after defeating the demons, Rama didn't theft their wealth to Ayodhya like East India Company in India, and British in all other countries in last two centuries in this world.
Why I targeted on Ranganayakamma and other writers and on Ramayana Visha Vruksham is, with their effort successfully they could smash the epics from the then young generation, of Telugu people. May others have done this duty in other languages in India? Now there is no such need to this coup makers i.e. Ramoji Rao, C.I.A, I.S.I and their supporters because they achieved the target of deleting the epics, moral values from society. That's why only most of our young & present generation does not know the epics and moral values.
To explain this I'll give you another example from Ramayana Visha Vruksham. In the context of Surpanakha, the sister of Raavana, the argument of Ranga nayakamma and the persons like her was as follows: When Sita, Rama, Lakshmana were residing at Panchavati, Surpanakha had seen them. She was crazy towards the handsome of Rama and Lakshmana. She approached Sri Rama as if a beautiful woman with the help of her demon powers i.e. Kamarupa Vidya, with Kamarupa vidya, demons could take any shape of body. They could change their appearance, as they like. She said with Rama "Hai! Man. Look. I'm beautiful. You are handsome. This weather is very pleasant. Let us enjoy." He said, "I have wife. There is my brother Lakshmana. He is also handsome. Go to him." she watched him and thought "Okay! He is also handsome". When she appealed to Lakshmana, he said, "Look! I'm servant to Sita and Rama. How can you enjoy with me? You also must become as servant house cleaner. So go to Rama." They played like this with the demon woman and cut her nose and ears. Without hypocrisy, she expressed her desire. She was frank enough and not like the cultured kings of Aryans or Hindu orthodox. Openly she expressed her desire. They should not play practical jokes on her. It was a great ill-treating a woman. It was their custom, in demons, to be with other men when they like them. Without considering their customs, Sri Rama and Lakshmana insulted her!
Is this argument correct? When any tribal from dense forest encroach, our land with violence by saying that it was their custom to encroach our land, which they like, shall we accept it, by accepting their customs and traditions? We will respect other's customs and traditions, but we won't allow them to super emboss their customs and traditions on us, by force. If we allow them to do so, after some time, we won't be alive as we are, we will be in their form. Actually, the coup makers, and their supporters targeted to convert Indians and idealistic people into materialistic people. With such arguments on Indian epics and Indian culture, strategically and successfully they achieved their target. Now our society, our people and we are suffering with those bad impacts by losing peace, bondages and happiness in life.
Now, I give you the real story in Ramayanam. When Surpanakha approached Rama, it was fact that Rama said "Oh! Woman! I'm with wife. I'm principled to one wife throughout my life. If you are particular about body beauty but not feeling, you can go to Lakshmana. He is lonely as well as handsome, "when she looked at Lakshmana, she satisfied with his handsomeness. Otherwise, she won't go to Lakshmana, would she? So that she was lustful to enjoy with body beauty but not with feel of love or something else. Then Lakshmana said as presented by Ranga nayakamma. Again, she approached Rama. They had noticed her immorality and lustful nature and smiled at it. She felt angry and jealousy towards Sita, she afforded to kill her. Then only Lakshmana had cut her nose and ears leaving her life, by thinking that she was a woman, though demon. If it was their custom in demons, to express their lust without hypocrisy, she had to stop there. But she had afforded to kill Sita, to fulfill her lust. Was this also their custom? If it was so, was it so entertainable? Then why not Surpanaka, Raavana and demons were eligible to get punishment?
On the other hand, if it was their custom in demons to express their lust without hypocrisy, then why Surpanakha said lie to Raavana as "Brother! In Dandakaranya, some princes were living. Rama, Lakshmana, among them the wife of Rama, Sita was very beautiful and eligible to be your Queen. When I tried to bring her as a gift to you, they cut my nose and ears without showing the generosity as I am a woman."
She had shown her strength, not like a woman, she had shown her cruelty to kill Sita. Again, she was blaming that Rama and Lakshmana didn't consider her as woman and show generosity on her, how much ill logic it was.
But Ranga Nayakamma spread her poison on the society with blind arguments, to support the coup. Might her reasons different, but the root reason of such activities was coup only. Otherwise, nobody will be such blind to see and to project all white as black unless it is wanted watching and wanted projection.
Following to this episode of Surpanaka, Raavana wanted to theft Sita. He didn't like to fight with Rama and carry Sita by winning the war. Actually, to snatch the others wife, doing war is also not righteous. But while compare with thiefting, it was better. But this Raavana, though he was scholar in many subjects such as political science, music, literature, war technologies, but he was coward to face Rama to fight in war. Even when Sri Rama attacked on Lanka with Kapi sena i.e. monkey army, Raavana didn't come to fight with Rama till end. After the death of Indra jit, Kumba Karna and other demon warriors, finally, in unavoidable stage, he came to fight with Sri Rama.
But Ranga nayakamma, some cine people and other coup supporters could see many good qualities in Raavana and many hippocratic and bad qualities in Rama. That's why I'm saying that this was coup and wanted working.
In the story of Ramayanam, when Raavana approached Maaricha, the son of Thatiki to help him, Maaricha said, "Ravana! Leave the idea of thiefting Sita, wife of Rama. In his childhood itself, Rama killed my mother and brother. He had beaten me with arrows; as a result, I was fallen near the ocean. As a result of it, I am residing here like a saint by leaving my demon and violent nature. Now he is in younger age, he is a very good worrier. Better to drop your idea. If I go to harm him, definitely he will kill me." Then Raavana said, "If you won't go to harm him, then I will kill you." Maaricha decided to implement Raavana's plan by saying "When death is unavoidable, then better to die in the hands of Rama, a good and moral man than to die in your hands, as you are bad and immoral demon".
What an intellectual and matured thinking. Our Brurthu Hari slokas tell us as "If is better to have rivalry with a capable person than to have friendship with incapable person." By the way, we can learn much. In another sloka, he tell us "it is better to make rivalry with a good person rather than making friendship with bad man." If we do friendship with bad person, he/she make us bad. And if we do even rivalry when friendship is not possible with a good man, the rivalry itself can make us to learn good.
This much of matured and morality is our ancestral property and heritage. It is not like the modern & Western idiom as "If rape is unavoidable, enjoy it." Our culture, our tradition, our heritage, our epics and our history including the queen Padmini Devi of Rajputs, didn't tell us this type of covertness. They taught us to fight against immorality and bad, there is nothing loss if we loss life. Do or die in the fight against bad and Adharma.
Look! From how height that our society had fallen to how depth by forgetting epics and culture, or by changing the attitude? Is the life peaceful with such immorality in lives?
To avoid the death in the hands of Ramana, Maaricha had changed his appearance like a golden deer and approached Sri Rama's ashram at Panchavati. Sita looked at it, it mesmerized her, and she desired to keep it in her ashram. With this desire only, she had fallen into life disasters. Up to that moment, she was enjoying the beauty of nature. Since 13 years in the forest, she didn't desire to grip it, to achieve it and to encroach it. If she satisfied by watching the beauty of golden deer, there won't be any danger to her. Whenever she desired to capture it, to bind it in her ashram, she had fallen in troubles. This episode of Ramayanam teaches us to enjoy the nature rather than capturing it and misusing it. Now the entire world is suffering and the earth itself had fallen in the danger of green house effect, global warm effect etc is resulting by the misusing of the nature.
In the context, when Sri Rama had gone to capture golden deer, it was the demon Maaricha imitated Sri Rama's voice with his talent and shouted "Ha Sita! Ha Lakshmana!" By hearing it, Sita had worried and asked Lakshmana to go to help Sri Rama. When he refused to go for the sake of her protection, she suspected him whether he had desire on her. In fact, she had known Lakshmana and his good character since her marriage with Rama and within these 13 years of living in forest also. She knew him, and his sincerity in serving them. Because she was influenced by Kama i.e. desire to fetch the golden deer, the remaining arishadwargas occupied her. So that she was influenced by krodha, i.e. anger and misused her tongue on Lakshmana without thinking about his hurting of heart. That's why only, always our epics, our culture and our philosophy tell us to prevent our mind from Arishadwargas i.e. six emotions. Those are Kama, Krodha, Lobha, Moha, and Mada, Matcharyas i.e. Desire, Anger, Greedy, Crazy, Proud, and Jealousy. Whenever we influence by one, immediately the remaining five occupy us. Those are like sisters. This context in Ramayanam makes us to remind the impact of arishadwargas. And more over Sita faced same doubt, and hence entered into fire after the killing of Raavana by Rama at Lanka. It indicates us the concept of 'what we do others; we have to receive the same from others'.
By driving Sri Rama and Lakshmana, Raavana had kidnapped Sita and taken her to Lanka. Sri Rama and Lakshmana returned ashram and noticed her missing. In search of her, they wandered in the forest. On the way, they met Sabari. She offered fruits after tasting them. She was particular about the ripe and taste of the fruits but not minded about the food defiled by contact with mouth. But Sri Rama didn't object. He accepted the fruits by noticing Sabari's affection, love, admiration or devotion towards him. That much was the depth of approach of feeling in Ramayanam.
In further search for Sita, they met Sugreeva, Hanuman on the hill Rushyamuka. They made friend ship. Sugreeva told his story, his difficulties and about his brother Vaali. Sugreeva said, "Rama! I know the sorrow of departure from loving wife, because I'm also facing it. My brother Vaali, kept my wife Ruma Devi in his palace and he didn't allow us to meet." They made friendship treaty. Sugreeva shown some ornaments which were dropped by Sita from sky when she was taking by Raavana and collected by Vanaras i.e. his monkey warriors. Within this all crises, as per Valmiki Ramayanam, Sri Rama used to lose consciousness, frequently. He used to recall the memories of Sasthras to self-guide to take appropriate action. He used to think negatively about others like ordinary man. In Valmiki Ramayanam, other characters like Dasaratha, Kowsalya, Lakshmana, Raavana and others also used to think like ordinary persons, i.e. with all emotions. As per Kodavatiganti Kutumba Rao, one of the famous writers of Telugu and other writer's opinion, Valmini Ramayanam was the first poetic writing so that it might be natural to have some disadvantages. Hence, we should not consider them as defects of Sri Rama and other persons of Ramayanam. Though it may be true, but on the other hand, people, other writers, poets, and artists, since thousands of years remembered Ramayanam from the Adi Kavya stages [i.e. first book] to ever green Kavya stage i.e.[permanent book]. By the way people forgotten or filtered the in-qualities stage & negatives of Ramayanam and they remembered the positive qualities of Rama. By the way, they identified and remembered a super ideal model of Sri Rama. Is this wrong? Is this bad? Though Sri Rama suffered by sorrow, though he cried in difficulties, he lost consciousness frequently, but he didn't stop there. By overcoming his sorrow, cries, he achieved the difficulties. He reached the target, won the war.
Both Sri Rama and Sita loved each other. Rama left his luxuries, parents, valuables and Kingdom to follow his father's order, but he didn't leave Sita. Actually, the king Dasaratha didn't order Sita and Lakshmana to go to forest with Sri Rama. Sita could not live by leaving Sri Rama, so she accompanied him. She didn't fear to leave the palace, wealth and to face the difficulties in the forest living. That much was their love upon each other. By losing such loving wife, if Sri Rama loss consciousness frequently, was it a crime or in-quality in Sri Rama?
When we eat sweet fruits like grapes, mangoes and custard apple etc., we take the sweet pulp of the fruit by splitting out the seeds of the fruits. Do we throw the fruits due to the seeds? Do we drop out living because of the difficulties in life? We don't be such foolish to do so. Definitely, we enjoy the fruits by eliminating the seeds. People had done the same in case of epics and epic stories. But the coup makers and their supporters like Ranga Nayakamma and other cine poets, writers strategically or wantedly highlighted the deleted negatives of epics and dropped back the positives of epics. Ordinary people, illiterate villagers have shown maturity in this angle where as these so-called intellectuals have shown crookedness to degrade Indian culture and Indian epics.
According to the friendship treaty made by Sri Rama and Sugreeva, Sri Rama had to help Sugreeva to defeat Vaali and Sugreeva had to help Sri Rama to find Sita and to get her back. As per the story, Vaali and Sugreeva were brothers who looked similar. Vaali, the elder brother had a boon to absorb the energy of the opposite person who fights with him. With the help of boon, Vaali could defeat anybody. He griped Raavana under his shoulders and dipped him in different oceans. The coup makers and their supporters like Ranga Nayakamma and other cine poets didn't remember this. But always they reminded that Sri Rama killed Vaali, hiding behind a tree. Because Sri Rama was the idealistic hero to the people where as Raavana was ideal hero to them, the coup supporters.
While Vaali and Sugreeva were fighting with each other, Sri Rama killed Vaali with an arrow, from behind a tree. Vaali asked him "Rama! You are not my enemy and I'm not your enemy. I didn't do any harm to you. You don't need my meat to eat. Then, instead of fighting with me, why you had attempted on me to kill from behind a tree? Is it not immoral and Adharma?"
Sri Rama said,"Vaali! You are not only monkey. You are the king of monkeys i.e. Vanacheras. Because of your energy and boon pride, you are doing immoral things. You prisoned your brother's wife, Ruma. Because of your immorality, I killed you. Being Kshatriya, I have such responsibility. You have the boon to absorb your enemy's energy who stands in front of you to fight. That's why I killed you from behind the tree. To establish Dharma and to eliminate Adharma in the society, I don't mind about my personal favors including good name i.e. fame."
Indian epics, and Indian culture, tell us to perform and to practice morals and Dharma to get good name i.e. fame. Later scarify the craze on good name i.e. fame to perform or practice morals and Dharma. The ultimate goal of Indians is to do work with morals. We took birth on this earth; we got life to do work with morals only, not to enjoy the luxuries. In fact, if we do work with morals, we can enjoy in work itself and the enjoying luxuries are nothing when compare with the joy in work. This truth is the uninterrupted supply to Indians from the epics, Ramayanam, Mahabharatham, and Bhagavatham.
I will discuss about the concept of work-energy, work-joy, as the energy & the joy are the existing form of God, under the caption of BHAGAVAD GEETHA in detail. This concept is known as "Budhi Yoga."
In vice versa, the coup makers i.e. Ramoji Rao, C.I.A. and I.S.I. and their supporters like cine poets & writers use the concept of Budhi Yoga to do works with immorality. For example, I can refer a recent movie 'Aks' acted by Amithab Batchan and Nanditha Das. By killing others, by doing bad works, the Villon in that movie, applied the concept of Budhi Yoga in such a nasty way. This is the replica of their strategy to degrade and to destroy Indian concept, Indian epics and Indian culture. There are number of such movies, books, essays, debates, art forms as in the part of their coup.
One more strategical critic of the coup on Sri Rama, I will explain to you. Because Sri Rama had killed Vaali from behind a tree, he was not as great as the people were praising him. Actually, these coup supporters could not understand the maturity and ideology of Sri Ramayanam, and they are wanted doing critics on epics. Let's agree their argument. But with a single defect, is the entire character of Sri Rama disposable? In fact, showing defects, searching defects in Sri Ramayanam & Sri Rama is itself coup to delete, to degrade, to dispose Sri Rama, Sri Ramayanam and its idealistic views from public attitude. That's why they are showing one defect in Sri Rama and disposing 99 of his effects. Is it not coup? I'll explain the motive of coup and the result of coup to you in the last part of this writing under this caption i.e. coupon Indian epics.
By killing Vaali, Sri Rama wanted to establish moral values. That's why only he didn't take single thing from his kingdom. He didn't enter even into that city or king's palace. He didn't enjoyed single luxury there. He made Sugreeva as the King of Kishkindha. He killed Vaali, which Sugreeva was not able to do. He won the kingdom. But he didn't take it. He made Sugreeva as its King. Such that Sri Rama had followed his father's order. For any sake, for any luxury, both Sri Rama and Sita didn't give up morals. That's why they became Gods in the view of public.
Basically, Indians had such attitude to devote people who sacrificed wealth and luxuries to follow morals. Indians constructed temples for such great people. That's why only Indians devoted Sidhardha, the son of king Shudhodhara, when he left wealth, became Budha. Indian had constructed temples to God Budha.
Such Indians are now constructing temples to cinema heroines like Khushbu, cinema heroes and cricket stars and devoting them with craze. Strategically and successfully, coup makers and their supporters had driven Indians from that peaks to this valleys.
Now they are arguing that nobody can follow morals by scarifying the self-luxuries, so that Sri Rama was an imaginary character by poet Valmiki, but not a real man who lived on this earth.
If this coup continues, after some time, people can argue that Bapu i.e. Mahatma Gandhi will be an imaginary character but not really happened and lived man on this earth. Already the great scientist of those days of Mahatma Gandhi, Albert Einstein had guessed this and gave such statement, as "people in future, may not believe that a person like Mahatma Gandhi had lived on this earth like us."
Up to Kishkindha Kandha, the story was this. In Sundar Kanda, God Anjaneya had reached Lanka in search of Sita. There he watched Sita Devi's stubborn nature, her determination to follow the morals. Raavana played 'Samadana Bheda Dandopayas' on her to melobon her to marry him. He tried to convince her, by showing his wealth, richness and greatness. He tried to convince her by offering the Maharani i.e. Queen Seat to her. He tried to convince her by threatening her to kill. He kept her in Ashoka Vana, under the protection of woman demons, in rude manner. In spite of all these, Sita didn't see Raavana. She kept a twig symbolically as Raavana and scolded him to realize his mistake and bad act.
Now some of modern women are dating with their bosses for the sake of promotions, leaves, or parties in the five star hotels and for some valuable gifts. As per the Survey of some agency, which was published in Enadu, 40% of modern women, woman employees had expressed their opinion, as 'there is nothing wrong in keeping extra marital or sexual relations with bosses.'
Here in Kishkindha Kanda there was a peculiar character Tara, wife of Vaali. She was very wise, intellectual, but crazy towards luxuries. She lived with Vaali happily. When Vaali was suspected to be dead, Sugreeva became the King of Kishkindha. Then Tara lived with Sugreeva happily. When Vaali returned after defeating Dundubhi, driven out Sugreeva with anger by mistaking him as played coup on himself, Tara lived with Vaali happily. At any time, she didn't leave wealth and luxuries; she left her bondages with husband. She didn't mind about the morals. In case of Ruma, Vaali kept her under custody. In case of Tara, she voluntarily, enjoyed with Vaali and Sugreeva without feeling difference.
Such that Tara represents some of modern women who didn't mind about morals. On this issue, Ranga Nayakamma spread her poison by criticizing Sugreeva, that Sugreeva also equivalent to Vaali in the case of Tara. So by killing Vaali and by protecting Sugreeva, Rama played strategic role to extract self-favors. Same case in the issue of Vibhishana, the brother of Raavana who opposed Raavana's bad activities such as desiring other's wives, and bringing of Sita, Ranga Nayakamma criticized Sri Rama and made many satires. She had pictured that Rama was a selfish and Hippocratic man. He had desire on fame than luxuries; hence, he behaved in such a manner as if he was following the morals. These morals were not real morals. She argued this in case of Surpanka, Vanaras and demons. Can we accept that to kill a person because of the anger is the moral of one race of people? Now, in America, some people are losing balance, because of emotions or perversions, entering into the classrooms of educational institutes and shooting the students with guns. Can we accept it, as their moral and as their custom? She argued with such illogic.
Actually, Sri Rama didn't take anything from Kishkindha and Sugreeva, by giving it to him after killing Vaali. He didn't take anything from Lanka and Vibhishana, by giving it to him after killing Raavana. After killing Raavana, Lakshmana had watched Lanka and its wealth. He said, with Rama as "Brother Rama! This Lanka is more prosperous and wealthy than our Ayodhya. Why don't we leave Ayodhya to Bharatha and rule this Lanka? Any way we won it."
Sri Rama said, "జననీ జన్మభూమిశ్చ స్వర్గాదపి గరీయసి" that means he said, "Even the heaven is not greater than mother and mother land to everybody."
These words are valuable to every Indian. Can we praise, or love our neighboring aunty if she is beautiful than our mother? How can a kid think that his mother is ugly and the neighbor aunt is beautiful? Because of his love towards his mother, he can watch her as beautiful woman, and he can't imagine that any other woman can be more beautiful than his mother can. If his mother is poor, if his mother is with illness, he works hard to help her. That is the love and bondage of a son with his mother. The patriotism resembles with this. Sri Rama expressed this with 100% clarity.
But, successfully, the coup makers had made Indians to forget all this. In 1970 to 1992, people including doctors, Engineers, and scholars as per educational qualifications, used to scold India as "Bloody country" and went to foreign countries as migrants. So many non-residential Indians were like that. I had one friend who commented like this. Nobody had tried to support India and to develop India.
Now, after 1992, some of Non Residential Indians [N.R.I.] are remembering their mother country, India and donating money to develop it. May it is strategic or spyingful patriotism or real patriotism. Any way we must feel happy, as at least now, many of people are recalling the idealistic views.
While searching for Sita in Lanka, God Anjaneya had suffered with so many doubts about morals and he thought about righteous behavior. He thought how to behave, how to manage the crises and how to fruitful the order which his master had given to him to follow. Though he had miraculary power, he was not egoistic. He was intellectual, expert in political knowledge and political matters. He was very obedient to his master. He was adventurous, dare enough to face the enemy, Raavana who was very strong and powerful. He faced demons in their place, as a single person. Such dare was his asset.
By hearing Ramayanam, all children used to fascinate towards Anjaneya, as well as Bheema Sena in Mahabharatham. Being child, it is every Indian's experience. To all of our body building exercises such as whrisling, weight lifting etc arts, temples of Anjaneya are shelters or traditional gym centers. Being kid, every Indian in their childhood, used to chant God Anjaneya's name whenever they feel fear towards any issue. In those days children used to dream to become as strong as God Anjaneya. They used to play by acting like God Anjaneya in their child Dramas and games. But now children don't know Ramayanam properly, they do not have time to play and to imagine themselves as God Anjaneya with their corporate studies. Their parents have no time to tell Ramayanam to them. More over maximum parents also do not know it. Any way there are no grandparents to guide them. If grandparents are there in some families, they are not getting respects to guide their children and grand children. One happy thing in this modern days, like cool breeze in hot desert is the popularity of 'Hanuman', the cartoon i.e. animation C.D. among children.
According to the coup, the total system of family life got damaged. T.V.s, T.V. serials with family coups, extreme emotions and abnormal expressions of actors with thousands of non-sensical episodes had occupied in the family life. Hence, many people are not finding time to speak with other members in the family. Ultimately, the Dish T.V. is leading our life. It won't allow us to feel an emotion without interruption. In the middle of every program, whatever the program will be, the cinema, drama or serial, there are multiple advertisements or Ads. We may forget which program that we are watching before starting the Ads interval.
By watching a program, a story, a cinema with such intervals of advertisements, we can't receive any concept, any feeling, or any motivation. With such interruptions, we can't concentrate on them. By the way, we will loss the power to concentrate our mind on one thing. Then, imagine the situation of children, who get habituated to watch T.V. for long time. T.V. influence them towards temptations, temptations towards corporate eatable products, like chocolate, biscuits, cool drinks, health drinks, ice creams, readymade dresses and other children products etc. By watching T.V. without physical industry and games, children become with obesity. These are all the current problems facing by the world due to the T.V. and computer among children.
Actually, this T.V. time is the time of epics and stories to the children. By listening epic stories from parents and grandparents or other elders, in this time, the bondage of children with elders get mature. Spending time like that, i.e. with epic stories instead of T.V., it will entertain both the elders and children, it will motivate both and it will keep the both in same frequency. This is because, being story tellers, the elders and being story listeners, the children are sharing the same subject. Among them, the elders are presenters or producers of entertainment i.e. storytelling and the children are receivers i.e. listeners of the entertainment. It will develop their patience, concentration power and communication skills. As we know, best listeners are best narrators. So that children can come up easily in their carrier.
Where as in T.V. the producer of the entertainment is different, i.e. belong to T.V. channel and including elders and children all are receivers. Among family members, they receive the entertainment according to their situations. That to direct Transmissions of arts and stories is much powerful than that in indirect transmission.
Such that epic stories have infinitive influence on Indians. It is like a pandal to a creeper. By demolishing it, successfully the coup makers had demolished the life style of Indians.
In Ramayanam, while constructing the bridge over the ocean, all the monkey worriers i.e. Vanara Veera had worked hard. Here is a small folk story among public. In fact it was imaginary one i.e. Prakshiptam, not in the original Ramayanam of Valmiki Maharishi.
While the Vanara veera's were constructing the bridge on the ocean, a squirrel had watched that the monkey worriers were helping Sri Rama. By that time, there were no three white lines on the back squirrels. The squirrel thought, "All the monkeys are helping Sri Rama. I'm not able to do anything. Being small living being in this world, what I can do to help Sri Rama in this good work?"
It thought deeply. It didn't like to be ideal, without doing any help to Sri Rama. It got an idea. Immediately it sank in ocean water and lay on sand. Some sand particles were sticked to its wet body. It had jumped on to the bridge and shriveled its body there to drop the sand particles on the bridge. It was repeatedly doing such. Sri Rama observed it. His heart melts with thankfulness and love towards it. He had taken the squirrel into hands and petted its back with his fingers. From that day onwards, all the squirrels are bearing three white lines on their back as the symbol of Sri Rama's fingers.
The concept of this story is what we do is important. But what we want to do is more important. That means intuition is more important than the act. Sri Rama Krishna Paramahamsa had explained the same. The squirrel had done little help. With its help, nothing- great help had done in the construction of bridge on ocean. But its intuition to help Sri Rama is big than the bridge and ocean. This idealistic concept is the base of this story.
There is an idiom as "Udatha sayam" i.e. "Help of Squirrel" to remind the concept in one word like short cut formula in public memory. This type of Prakshiptam i.e. some imaginary story additions to Valmiki Ramayanam and Vyasa Bharatham are there in public memory. Some unknown writers or storytellers were composed them in to original story and were patronized by people. Later they compiled in books, writings and art forms. But these are all positive Prakshiptams. The intuition of these Prakshiptams is to provocative positive thinking in people, to motivate them to think in righteous manner, to inspirit them to work for good.
By imitating this, the coup makers and their supporters like cine writers compiled some Prakshiptams with the intuition of degrading epics, their idealistic values and the positive characters of epics. Another intuition is to provocate emotions in public. Epics always tell people to get balance of mind. All these negative Prakshiptams tell people to have emotions is not wrong and all the positive characters in epics had no balance of mind.
The intuition to fabricate such stories as Prakshiptams is to make people to think as "For anybody, always to be with balance of mind is not possible. In fact, balance of mind i.e. Sthitha Pragnatha is not realistic. Such situations are imaginary only".
Among such Prakshiptams, the story of Sulochana was one. According to these coup makers and their supporters, Sulochana was the wife of Indrajit i.e. Meghadoot, the son of Raavana. They narrated her character as chaste wife as stubborn as Sita Devi. The intuition was that Sita was not so great and there were other women in demons even like her. The orthodox Hindus had super embossed that Sita was so great as a chaste woman. On the other hand, these coup makers and their supporters argue as "Because, in Ramayanam there were other women like Ahalya etc, then why Ramayanam was so good and great epic." Any way it seems that their target was/ is to degrade Ramayanam. That's why only they complied this type of stories into Ramayanam through movies and books. They created a propaganda that 'such stories and Prakshipthams were written in ancient time itself, just now those are getting attention in public. That's why only, movies on those stories came on to the screen. To those movies and books, the coup makers & their supporters have no connection'. In fact, the moviemakers or book writers are the supporters of the coup by knowing or unknowing.
Another story among Prakshiptams was; Sri Rama killed Raavana in the battlefield by using the Brahmasthra. He died immediately, because Brahmasthra was very powerful. But according to this Prakshiptham, Rama had sent Lakshmana to learn Raja Nithi i.e. political ethics or science from him. What a joke it was as per the characterization of the story even? Though Raavana was scholar in so many subjects such as political science or ethics, war technologies, languages and art forms such as music etc, he was the man without ethics. That's why only he stolen the other's wife, Sita and harassed her. From such ethic less demon, what was the political ethics that Sri Rama could want to learn to send Lakshmana. The intuition of this Prakshiptham was 'to unpopular Sri Rama and to give good image to Raavana'. Such image is now giving by coup makers to cinema heroes & heroines who are favorable to coup makers as dare, handsome or beautiful, capable etc etc irrespective of their personal abilities.
I want to give clear explanation about this. What the Prakshiptham i.e. complied story is irrespective. Who compiled such Prakshiptham is also irrespective. When it was compiled is irrespective. But the intuition of the Prakshiptham is very very important. If the intuition of the Prakshiptham i.e. compiled story is good and positive, if it motivates good in people it is not dangerous. If not, it should not be entertainable. Actually to compile something into the ancient writings or into epics or into religions books is not welcomable and not acceptable. In such case bad intutioned compiling of stories is terrible wrong. Is it not?
Some more Prakshipthams like Gayopakhyanam, Sasi Rekha Parinayam and Sri Ramanjaneya Yuddam are popular among public through stage dramas, Hari Kadha and Burra Kadhas. But in the prakshipthams, the originality of characters of epics is not change. A melodrama of creating of war in between Sri Krishna and Arjuna in the story of Gayopakhyanam projected the determination of Arjuna in practicing the morals and ethics. To practice such, how much psychological stress he faced and how Sri Krishna examined him, increased his self-confidence and protected Pandavas was dramatized. There was same case with Sri Ramanjaneya Yuddam. An entertainable conversation between Sri Rama and Anjaneya provoked people to think about the morals and bondages. In Sesi Rekha parinayam, which resembles in same points to the story of Subhadra Parinayam entertain the people by projecting the original nature of characters of epics. Such that, there was no bad intuition to degrade the morals and spirits of epics in those prakshipthams.
But, strategically and spying fully, so many Prakshipthams, i.e. compiled stories, arguments are mixed in Mahabharatham, Bhagavatham and Ramayanam. Ultimately, the idealism of those epics had eliminated from the society.
In sundara Kandam, so many psychological complexes were discussed. In Kishkindha Kanda, when Lakshmana entered into the palace of Sugreeva, it had described about the luxuries like anything. In the Bala Kanda, when Rama, Lakshmana, and Viswamithra reached Mathanga Maharishi's ashram, there was same description of enjoying the materials, so much of materialism. In Sundara Kanda, when God Anjaneya entered into the palace of Raavana, he had seen the extremity of Materialism means enjoying with food, liquor, arts and sex, valuable things and wealth.
Where as idealism means 'enjoying with feelings, bondages, as well as with materials, both in limits'. To write about such materialism in Bala Kanda, Aranya Kanda, Sundara Kanda, the poet Valmiki Maharishi must had the idea about it. To write about such idealism also, he might have the idea about it. That much was his level of intellectuality and maturity. By leaving all these things, if people like Ranga Nayakamma and other the then intellectuals discuss whether a poet by name Valmiki was really lived on this earth or so many poets had written Ramayanam by name Valmiki, is it not to draw the attention of people from the idealism, morality discussed in Ramayanam onto other things? Then is it not a coup? Are they not coup supporters or coup makers?
There may be one Valmiki or 100 Valmikis on one name, but the brain, which narrated such story with the presentation of that much idealism, and materialism was there. Is it not? By leaving this, why Ranganayakamma and other the then intellectuals had done such arguments on the unnecessary things? Then is it not coup to do so? If Ramayanam is imaginary, if Sri Rama not lived on the earth, but to fabricate such story, the poet must observe that much of morals & idealism in public. Otherwise, how can stories fabricated from vacuum?
After the killing of Raavana, Sri Rama had given the thrown of Lanka to Vibhishana, the brother of Raavana who opposed Raavana regarding morals. He didn't entered into Lanka city to watch its wealth even with curiosity to watch. He was that much idealistic. Sita Devi faced difficulties including threaten to life to protect her moral values. That's why they became Gods in the view of public. They didn't become as Gods because they born with ten thousands hands and twenty thousand heads like an ant who imagines a giant ant as its God, as per the western philosophers.
After the killing of Raavana, when Sita Devi came to Sri Rama he said, "Sita, I battled the war, not to protect you, but to protect dharma. I'm giving freedom to you. You can go, where ever you want to go." Sita said, "Oh my Lord! How cruel you are to me? If you send the same message with Hanuma on that day itself, I could leave my life easily as you are leaving me easily now? How can I live with this blame? Lakshmana arrange fire for me to die. On the day when we saw the golden deer at Panchavati, I blamed you. I'm now understood that how much pain you faced, while I'm facing the same difficulty."
Narrating this incident, the coup makers and their supporters argued that Sri Rama was very cruel, doubted his own wife, that's why he demanded her to prove her purity.
In those days some writer, I forgotten his name, who admired epics argued, "Sri Rama had done such to prevent Sita from the blame from public."
Immediately these coup supporters like Ranga Nayakamma said, "So, before people saying, Rama said the blame. To prevent them from blaming Sita, he blamed her in prior. Then, is Rama not a hypocrite?"
If you refer, the then published essay and debates in journals, Newspapers, you can clearly observe the intuition of these coup supporters. Anyway, in any manner, they want to blame Sri Rama and to degrade Sri Rama.
To understand this, I'll refer a joke to you. The liquorhalic person says that. Today, I am happy to celebrate that happiness I'm drinking liquor.
Next day: today I'm sad; to forget the sadness I'm drinking liquor.
Another day: today, I won. So I'm drinking.
Another day: Today, I defeat. So I'm drinking.
To drink, if he do not find any cause, for such 'causelessness, he will drink. The intuition of the liquor addict is to drink liquor; cause is nothing but a cause.
Just like a liquor addict, the coup makers i.e. CIA, ISI, Ramoji Rao and their supporters like Ranganayakamma and other writers need a cause for the sake of cause to degrade Indian epics.
Another example I'll give you. In the context of Sri Rama Patbhishekam i.e. ceremony of crown, Sri Rama rewarded everybody in Vanara Sena with valuable gifts. With Anjaneya, he said "My loving Anjaneya. You are my life donor. You found Sita and gave life to me with her safety information. You saved Lakshmana when Meghanadha attacked, what are the valuable gifts that I can present you? So that, I'll hug you."
By referring this Ranga Nayakamma said "Yes, my lord. Yes, the gift of hugging is no need of money pay. That's why you selected that gift." Sri Rama who left all the wealth and kingdom could consider money while rewarding his loving ones? That's was her commercial critic. In such case, no parent should hug their children, because the children could not give any money in return of hugging to parents, and vice versa among all other bondages. Is there any difference in between this type of thinking and a thinking of prostitute? Here I'm not comparing Ranga Nayakamma with a prostitute. I'm comparing 'the thinking of comparing the hug to express the human bondage with money' to 'the thinking in the profession of prostitution'. That's all! On the other hand, if a person get a shake hand from a cinema hero or cricket star or from a P.M. or C.M. or from a President of a Country, it is considerable as great achievement in now a days. That's why only photos and videos are taken to remark such moments. If the touch of celebrity is considered as valuable gift, then why not 'the hug of Sri Rama' who won Lanka, the rich country and killed Raavana was valuable? Such that the cause of critic was a cause only.
Similarly, the intuition of coup supporters like Ranga Nayakamma, other people and writers is to degrade Sri Rama, Ramayanam, epics and their moral values, in one word totally idealism.
To explain the intuition of coup makers and their supporters, I refer another issue. In Sundara Kanda, in the context of Anjaneya's conversation with Sita Devi, he told about the issue of Kakasura. According to that, a bad demon Kakasura, in the shape of crow had bitten Sita on her breast middle, when Sita and Rama were at chitra Kuta Mountain. At that time, Sri Rama was sleeping by keeping head in Sita's lap. When blood drops had fallen on his face, he woke up, thrown a twig by making it as Brahmasthra, Kakasura died. While criticizing this context, Ranga Nayakamma said by referring Valmiki Maharishi "Lord Valmiki! Where the crow i.e. Kakasura had bitten Sita? At the mid of her breast. Yes. Yes. Other place how can you see? Always you see the breast, buttocks of Sita. You are describing her body parts in poems by comparing her breast with palm fruits and buttocks with elephant's back etc."
Whatever may be one Valmiki or hundreds of Valmikis, can a writer see with sexual approach towards his own created characters? Won't they feel the writings, the characters in their books as if their children? Pothana said that "కావ్యకన్యక" i.e. the poetic writing i.e. book of himself was like his daughter. Every painter will feel that each and every of his painting will be like his child. Every sculpture will feel that each and every of his ideal will be like his child. Every cinema director will feel that each and every of his movie will be like his child. Recently Telugu film director Sekhar Kammula said that his two movies 'Anand' and 'Godavari' are like his daughters and the other movie 'Happy Days' like his son. In such case, how she could say that Valmiki Maharishi used to see the physical beauty of his own female character? To say such, whatever may be her reason, it seems to be purposeful and wanted activity. By that time of 1970 to 80, when some scholars who admired epics and their idealism, argued about this, then Ranga Namayakmma said, "Since generations and generations, since epics era to modern era, since thousands of years, the orthodoxies, the male world are considering the woman as equal to luxurious and enjoyable things. That's why only such descriptions are there in the epics. That's why I criticized it."
Okay! I'll accept her logic. In such case, in those days, in Telugu movies, directors, producers had shown woman through their wamp songs with actresses and club, dancer's roles played by Jyothi Lakshmi, Jayamalini etc etc who wore the small pieces of clothes on their bodies, just covered 30% of the body. Those sexual dancing star i.e. శృంగార నృత్యతార i.e. Jyothi Lakshmi, Jayamalini were the great grandmothers to the now a day's heroines who are wearing cloth ribbons, jeddies and middies on the wrists and breasts. Extremely the heroines are appearing with such dress of cloth pieces not only on the film screens but in the private functions also. This fashion was started there and gradually developed from wamp actress to heroine actress from movies to practical, that to, the sexual description in books is imaginary thing to the reader. But in movies, the director and cameraman focus their camera on the breast, buttocks, belly and thighs of the actresses in close up shot and exposing on the screen. And the female artists also ready to stand in front of camera in nude.
But strategically, Ranga Nayakamma and other persons like her didn't criticized on them, and on those movies or totally on that issue. Until date, no other Junior Ranga Nayakamma born to do such critics and no newspaper media is ready to publish such critics as they published critics of Ranga Nayakamma on Ramayanam. Then is it not a coup on Indian epics, an Indian culture on Indian idealism?
Actually Indian illiterate people didn't consider about the traditions of poetic narrations. They considered only about the feelings, morals and idealistic attitude. They know to enjoy the fair and pure water of the floating water without thinking about the mud, dirt under the water at the bottom of the river. These intellectuals, only to support the coup could see the mud and dirt by leaving the pure water of the river. Then is it not a coup on Epics?
When Sri Rama had returned from forest after 14 years, after killing of Raavana, along with Sita, Lakshmana and other friends like Sugreeva, Vibhishana etc, Bharatha handed over the Kosala Kingdom, which he was ruling on behalf of Sri Rama's name within these 14 years. Such that all of they had followed morals and idealistic views. All of they served public.
As per Usha Sree who had told Sri Ramayana, Mahabharatha as serial on A.I.Redio for years when we were children, and who had given a familiarity to the lacks of Andhra people about idealism, morals in epics in his foreword in Vachana Ramayanam [T.T.D. Published] said as follows.
In Ramayanam, three types of women mainly discussed. Sita, she is the woman with high moral values, she could faced so many difficulties to follow morals. She left every wealth to support her husband when he was in difficulties by following Sri Rama to forest. She was stuburn in following morals when she was in Lanka, under the custody of Raavana, who harassed her in all possible ways. She was very obedient, intellectual, dare wife, talented and sweet talkative woman. With words, with her acts maximum level she never hurt others.
Another character is Tara, the wife of Vaali. She was the replica of some of modern women who are not particular about the morals and only particular about the money and luxuries.
Another character is Mandodari. She was wife of Raavana. She was the replica of maximum members of ordinary wives in now-a-days society. Raavana was an addicted man to other women. With such weakness, he destroyed his life and his country's life. But Mandodari never rebal to her husband. With patience, she had bare him. Raavana in such angle exploited her. Irrespective of income of the families, we are watching so many women as wives like Mandodari.
And more over, Sri Usha Sree and other scholars who admire the idealism in epics, tried to lead people to follow morals.
In fact, from Sri Ramayanam we can learn morality from each and every character and incident.
In the story of Uttara Ramaayanam also, Sri Rama, Sita practiced the moral values. Being king, Sri Rama considered a drunken washer man's comment and sent Sita to forest. While his younger brothers opposed it, Sri Rama said, "Sita is mine. She belongs to me and I belong to her. We have authority on our lives. We can sacrifice it for the sake of morals. But the good fame of our race is not my asset. How can I leave or sacrify it for the sake of my life?"
Such that both Sri Rama and Sita sacrified their personal life to keep people with morals, by thinking that it was their duty. By the way, they made people to notice that taking liquor and talking without limits was how much dangerous? Indians also this much matured to understand sacrifice, sincerity and truthfulness. That's why only they followed Bapu, a thin man, a simple dressed man, in his truth and non-violence way to win such cruel & inhuman British Govt., which performs such mascare, and to get independence, from them. That's why only Indians can remember Sita Rama in the Saint get up rather than in the king and queen get up.
Another irony of life in Sita Devi's life is in the forest at Panchavati. She desired to capture golden deer. Ultimately, at the time of Aswamedha Yagna, Sri Rama ordered the sculptures to make the golden idol of Sita. When she desired gold, she made into golden idol. But for it, she lost the companionship with Sri Rama and the life with Sri Rama. Is gold valuable than the life and bondage with loving husband? Is it not telling us that 'if we run after the wealth, we will loss affections, love and bondages in life?'
Regarding the episode of lava Kusa, the twin sons of Sri Rama and Sita Devi, both of them performed their duty in bringing up them up, by coaching them to achieve righteous personality and skills. Sita Devi handed over them to their father Sri Rama and sacrified life. By making them as perfect future kings of Ayodhya, Sri Rama handed over them people and sacrified life. They didn't neglect to bring up Lava and Kusa.
By referring this, the coup supporters, especially Ranga Nayakamma said that, "Rama had committed suicide, in the water of river Sarayu. Hence, he was not dare enough, and he should not be treated as roll model to people. The orthodox, the selfish Hindu made him as hero". Such that, without shy and doubts, she compared the Avathara Samapti i.e. scarify of life of Sri Rama with the suicide of a weak person of now a days. Now-a-days suicide attempted fellows are weak minded, in capable and coward people. To face the difficulties in life, they are committing suicide. But Sri Rama was not coward, not failed in life.
But wantedly, these coup makers and their supporters tried to degrade Sri Rama and epics. Since decades of years, the coup makers i.e. Ramoji Rao, C.I.A. and I.S.I, with the help of their supporters are keenly watching the Indian society and carefully observing the public attitude to estimate how far they succeeded in the implementation of the coup and to design further strategy of coup to destroy idealism. By destroying the idealism, their target is not driving the people to righteous materialism. Their target is to drive the people to corporatism. Utter materialism also had some morals as well as idealism had many morals. But corporatism had no morals except robbering like British ruler in India.
To demo the keen observation of coup makers to plan and to implement the coup, I'll refer you one example.
When Ramananda Sagar produced Ramayanam on D.D. in eighties of last century, Indians were mesmerized by it. It got big popularity. At the time of the telecast of Ramayanam on T.V. the roads were without traffic as if there was curfew. In beginning, Media propagated about that 'undeclared curfew'. Gradually some gossips were entered in the propaganda such as Ramananda Sagar was not paying remuneration to the artists & technicians, he was miser etc etc such that, there was an introducing of a feeling that "a person who produced Ramayanam TV serial also was not a good man. Then what will be the value and impact of the morals of Ramayanam, when the producer of that TV serial without morals. If the morals of Ramayanam are not able to induce morals in the producer himself then how can it induce morals in viewers? Hence, Ramayanam is out dated, not suitable to modern days. Next, immediately, BR Chopra presented Mahabharatham but it was a sugar cane scrap without juice. It was a story presentation but not the idealistic presentation. Ramananda Sagar presented idealistic views by Arun Govil, the actor who played as Sri Rama like "There is a long gap in between the beginning and wining of the war" in the context of war at Lanka. He presented morals & idealistic views wherever possible in the story, following Valmiki Maharshi's presentation.
But such sincerity was absent in BR Chopra's Mahabharatham. The wave of emotion started with TV serial, Ramayanam was thus scattered and gradually dropped with TV serial Mahabharatham.
Such that coup makers and their supporters successfully played the strategy of Nalla Meka – Naluguru Dongalu i.e. BLACK GOAT AND FOUR THEIVES to make the people to believe that Ramayanam and Mahabharatham are out dated and not suitable to these days.
Now I try my level best to explain the coup on Mahabharatham. In fact, from MahaBharatham only the coup makers designed their coup by following the strategy explanation in Mahabharatham.
I try to explain it with detailed examples. In Indian epics, Sri Ramayanam, Mahabhartham, Bhagavatham and Sri Bhagavad Geetha are related to one another, explained one in another, based on one concept i.e. Sri Bhagavad Geetha, in one word, Balance of mind [స్థితప్రఙ్ఞత] Sthitha Pragnatha. Regarding this concept, to explain this concept, the great souls Sri Rama, Sri Krishna had shown us how to achieve Sthitha Pragnatha i.e. balance of mind. All other Vedas, Upanishads also lead us to this stage only. That's why only in Indian hearts, Sri Rama, Sri Krishna become Gods. Throughout his life, in difficulties, how to be with balance of mind, how to follow our Dharma, how to fulfill our duty without emotions, Sri Rama had shown us to follow.
Sri Krishna shown us this, i.e. how to be with balance of mind, how to follow our Dharma, how to fulfill our duty without emotions, in wealth and happiness. Actually, to be with balance in difficulties, is easy when comparing to the same i.e. to be with balance, in wealth and happiness. Because in wealth and happiness. We will be dominating by ego easily.
Sri Ramayanam was referred in Aranya Parvam, Mahabharatham by Markandeya Maharishi in the context of counseling Dharma Raja to give moral support to him, to face the difficulties. Total Mahabharatham was a flash back-story told by Vysampayana Maharishi to others in the Sarpa Yagna of Janamejaya Maharaja. By referring like this, along with the story of Sarpa Yagna, Sutha Maharshi told all the flash back-story of Mahabharatham to Sounaka etc Muni's in Nimesaranya. And Bhagavatham was a flash back-story told by Suka Yogi to Parikshithu Maharaj when he was waiting to meet his death, as per the curse given by Srungi, the Muni. So the flash back circles in circles technic of Telugu movies is taken from this epics only.
When Janamejaya Maharaja was performing Surpa Yagnam, the saints requested Vyasa Maharaja to tell them Maha Bharatham. He deputed that work to his disciple Vyasampayana.
He narrated Mahabharatham as if picturaised to the view of listeners. Maharaja Parikshith was the father of Janamejaya Maharaja and grandson of Arjuna. He was very good ruler and ruled his country for 70 years. He was old enough. One day he went to hunt the animals in the forest. After hunting so many animals, he tired. With tiresome and thrust, he reached Sameeka Maharishi ashram. Because the saint did not paid any attention to him due to his penance, the king felt anger and helpless. He had put a dead body of a snake in the neck of Sameeka Muni and returned to his kingdom.
On that day itself, the son of Sameeka Mahamuni, Shrungi was returning from GuruKulam to home. On the way, his childhood friend Krusha met Shrungi. He informed about the act of King. Shrungi got angry but tried to control it by thinking that the primary anger was not correct, but Krusha provocated him.
Shrungi irritated and cursed the king, as "Parikshithu will die due to the poison of Thakshaka by the seventh day from today because of his sin towards my father."
When Sameeka Maharishi was informed about this, he said "Son! Won't you know that anger is not suitable to us? Parikshith is a good king. He is tired. He might be with hunger and thirsty, so that he didn't have patience to notice that I was in penance. You cursed him. Because of the ruling of such good king, we are peaceful in the forest. You made me sad by cursing him. Because of your curse, the country will become impeaceful. The criminals harass the ordinary people. People become immoral. With the ruling of good king, public will prevent the immoral behavior. Inform Parikshith regarding this.
In this story, Parikshith had disrespected Sameeka Muni. But Sameeka didn't anger with Parikshith. His son Shrungi also controlled his anger. But Krusha provocated his anger. Such that the emotions of 'non-connective persons' had damaged the country. Here, now the emotions of party volunteers are damaging the country by organizing the damage of Govt. assets.
By telling this type of stories i.e. Upakhyanams in Sathsangam or purana Pravachanam in temples and Bhajana Mandirs, the elders used to explain the people how the anger is dangerous to us.
Parikshith was waiting to meet death and spending time in devotion by listening Bhagavatham by Suka Yogi. He spent six days. On the seventh day, a Brahmin Kashyapa who knew the magic Sasthraw was coming to meet king. He desired to prevent death to king and to get large rewards from him. Thakshaka met him on the way and said, "Hei! Brahmin. Your talent is great. But the king's life scan is over. He is a cursed man. With this background, if your skill is not useful, you will get degrade. So leave your desire and go back."
The Brahmin didn't agree. When Thakshaka offered large amount of wealth he returned home. By referring this, we can know that the power of corruption and the impact of time i.e. Kali Yuga. As per epics, the time is divided into 4 yugas. The first one is Krutha yuga. In this time, Dharma was on four legs like a cow. People were 100% with morals. They didn't lie, and bad things. There was no need of doors to houses because there were no thieves. There was no need of preaching because everybody knows his own duty.
The second one is Threthayuga. In this time, Dharma was walking on 3 legs. Sri Rama's Avatar was in this time to keep people in Dharmic way.
The third is Dwapara Yuga. In this time, Dharma was walking on two legs. In the end of this Yuga, Sri Krishna avatar was there, to keep people under the control of Dharma.
The fourth one is Kali Yuga. We are living in this Kali Yuga. It had started by the time of birth of Duryodhana in Mahabharatham. In this era, the dharma is walking on single leg instead of four legs. People become very immoral. Nobody will preach good things and if some great souls preach it, only few members will listen it and follow it. In maximum time, the immorality become strong than morality and truth.
Thus, the impact of immorality and corruption was shown in the story of Kashyapa. Being the citizen of country, he had the responsibility to save the life of king. But he desired money but not desired to perform his duty.
In the context of Sarpa Yaga, in the story of Vinatha and Kadruva, there are a lot of morals. When Vinatha and Kadruva bet themselves regarding the color of Utchaishravam, the divine horse, Vinatha bound to truth, where as Kadruva tried to prove false as truth. To show the white horse as black, to win the bet, she asked her sons, the snakes wound round the body of horse. When they feared to do so, she cursed them to get kill in the Sarpa Yagna of Janameya Maharaja. With the ego to win the bet, she was influenced by arishadwargas and cursed her own sons. In the following of that her sons, i.e. snakes got tear off their tongues and had in-secured life. With jealousy, she made Vinatha and her son as slaves. But finally, the snakes became food to Garuda. Vinatha confined to truth only, so that her son became fame as strongest person, and Garuda became a carrier to God Vishnu. That was the impact of truth and influence of lie. The story of 'Gaja Katchapa' tells us why not the brothers should quarrel in the case of assets and wealth. If they do so, the others can eat up them like Garuda. Now-a-days, we are watching that the advocates and courts are eating up the brothers who are quarrelling in the sharing of the assets. In the context Asthek's story, who could stop the Sarpa yagna, it tells us how sweet the educated and knowledgeous boy will be.
In the story of Asthek, his parents were Jarathakaru Muni and Jarathkaruvu. His mother Jarathkaruvu followed Swana Kaka Vratham in serving her husband. That means:- Swa means dog. Dog need little bit of sleep. In the rest of time, it can do much work. Like that, she was serving her husband without tiresome. Ana means deer. Deer is most alert and awaritive about the danger. It always behaves with fear. Like that, she was alert, awaritive to serve her husband as well as fearful of committing any mistake in such work. Kaka means crow. Crow is very intelligent bird and it can absorb our thought by action itself without word. Like that, she was very active in absorbing husband's needs, requirements and desires. Jarathkaruvu had taken this Swana Kaka Uratham to serve her husband. If we take this policy in performing our duties, project works and every work, is there any possibility to fail? With such policy, is there any possibility to have in satisfaction in work and in its result? By leaving this vision, if so-called intellectuals and woman liberation members argue, as this is female servant ship, exploitation of women, male ego etc etc, what we can say? The relation between wife and husband is the personal thing. And the epics had not only given guide to women to become as an ideal wife, the epics had given guidance to men also to become as an ideal husband. The epics had given guidance to all people such as teachers, elders, disciples, children, rulers, people, artists, masters and servants. By neglecting all this good, high lighting the non-sensical arguments on epics, is the coup.
In those days, people used to walk or travel on horses or chariots. But now we modified our travelling facilities into train, car, aeroplane etc. Like that, we can modify the facilities, and the application of moral concepts. We have to take good, wherever it is, irrespective from epics and modern times. As well, we have to leave bad wherever it is, irrespective from epics and modern times.
While explaining Mahabharatham to Janamejaya Maharaja, Vysampayana Maharishi said that "MahaRaja! The great scholar, intellectual, Sri Vyasa Maharishi, my Guru deva had deposited all the Dharma of Vedas in this Mahabharatham, with one lack of slokas in 100 divisions i.e. Parvams, that to, in sweet, melodious and poetic way. In this epic, these is not only the history of Kuru and Pandavas races, there is history of all the then kings. Dharma Ardha Kama Mokshaw i.e. Chaturvidha Purashardha that means the ultimate goal of a person is disguised in this in detail. There is technological science. There is the detail description of rivers, rivelutes, lakes, seas and oceans i.e. the geographical science, war technology. Literature, grammar poetic sense, narration of story with flash backs, readability and suspense, in one sentence, there is all in this epic. Anything, any guidance you can locate in this epic."
By leaving all this, without referring the truths, without practicing the morals and concepts, discussion about its real happening or discussing about the existence of Veda Vyasa, how foolish it is?
In Telugu, there is an idiom "విస్తరాకులు ఎత్తమంటే జనాభా లెక్కలు వేసాడట మూర్ఖుడు ". That means:- In functions & celebrations, Telugu people used to have their food in leafy plates. After the lunch or dinner, the elders ordered a young man to remove those used leafy plates. But the foolish young man had counted the population of people that how many attended the feast, so that how many plates of leafs that he had to remove. To refer such foolish persons and such foolish activities, people use this idiom.
The coup makers and their supporters had provacated the same foolish arguments regarding the real happening of epic stories and the authors.
As per their arguments, we don't know whether Vyasa Maharishi was there or not. Okay. But there must be some person to write all these lack of slokas and story based on one concept i.e. Indian Dharma. Whatever his name, Vyasa or something else, whoever wrote this, the name of such great man was Vyasa.
As per the other argument of coup makers and their supporters, if there was not one Vyasa, if there were more than 100 Vyasas, then why not that it was the greatness of Indians. Not only a great man who was capable to think, to write and to establish such epic, if there were many such people then why not Indian society of ancient times was that much great? If a society had one great person, it is great. If a society had many great persons, then is it not great than great?
And more over, in this epic, Vyasa Maharishi narrated a great story with full of morals and truth to follow. In this epic, all the elders, the saints, the scholars, the kings practice these morals and Dharma to lead people with actions, not with words. For example, the stories were told and listened by saints to saints and by saint to kings. This brought the slokam of Sri Bhagavad Geetha 'Yadya Dacharithi Shresha:' into implementation.
In the context of birth of Vyasa Maharishi:- A girl was born to Uparichara Maharishi and divine lady Adrika, who was in the shape of fish due to a curse by name Mathya Gandhi alias Satyawathi. She was brought up by a man, Dasaraja. He kept her in boating work to serve the people to cross the river. She had grown up into beautiful young woman. But her body was emitting the odor of fish.
One day a great Maharishi Parasara came there to cross the river. While crossing the river, he had seen Mathya Gandhi. He desired her. He expressed it to her. He didn't propose to marry her. She said, 'I'm unmarried girl, under the control of my father. If I fulfill your lust, I will get blame and I will loss my virginity. That to my body is emitting fish odor. Here several saints are there in my boat as passengers. You are the saint and scholar. I don't like to reject you. You please save me from losing virginity and from getting blame. Then you enjoy my body and beauty."
He had satisfied her conditions, she had satisfied his desire. By instantaneous pregnancy, she had given birth to a boy. By birth itself, that boy was knowledgeous and he was Vyasa Maharishi. He said "Mother! I'm going to penance. Whenever you recall me in your mind, I'll be in front of you." Then he went to penance.
With the reference of this, the coup makers and their supporters had argued that the birth of Vyasa Maharishi itself was immoral, then where is the address of morality in Mahabharatham? You can refer the then literature and arguments published in weeklies and Newspapers, debates among Nasthika Samaj and Hethu Vada Samgams, and cinema scripts of 1970 to 1992. For ready reference, I can remind you the script of Dana Veera Sura Karna by the character of Duryodhana in the scene of Kshatriya Pariksha i.e. talent show, presented by the cinema hero Mr. N.T. Rama Rao, in his own direction and production. Regarding the implementation of the coup on epics, art forms and cinemas Mr. N.T. Rama Rao was an important supporter to the coup makers. As a return gift, Mr. NTR got powerful image, grip in cinema field. He was made as C.M. of Andhra Pradesh. Being C.M. of a state, he got an invitation from White House, so that he got an easy appointment with the then president of America in White House, whereas, being P.M. of India, Mrs. Indira Gandhi was made to wait to meet the then president of America in White House, after the war with Pakistan in 1972 following which the formation of Bangladesh was happened.
Regarding this part of the coup, I'll explain in the following of this topic i.e. coup on Indian epics.
Regarding the strategical argument on the birth of Vyasa Maharishi, his mother Mathya Gandhi who became Pushpa Gandhi with the boon given to her by Parasara Maharishi didn't had son due to her lust. By satisfying Parasara Maharishi's desire, she didn't desire any wealth or valuable things. Her intuition was to satisfy the saint Parasara Maharishi who expressed the sexual desire on her. As concern as Parasara Maharishi, he was a saint and scholar. He didn't like to leave his penance and to take Grahastha Ashram by marring her. For that, he invested his power of penance, which they consider more valuable than all valuable wealth.
NTR and other cine people presented same type of argument in the case of birth of Dhrutha Rashtra, PanduRaja, and Vidura. In their births at Ambika, Ambalika and a servant maid by Vyasa Maharishi also, there was no lust or desire to have wealth or heaven, only the intuition was to have children. In fact, the aim and meaning in the Hindu marriage itself is to have children and to bring up them into complete capable and perfect personalities. Indians and their culture describe the sex between male and female as Srushti Yagna i.e. creating Yagna. The sex activity is meant to have children not to enjoy time or life. The sex activity is not a business. When the sex life involved in the marriage itself is meant to have children, then we can understand how much importance was given to human beings existence in this world and to their race continuation in this world. The children are the future of present generation. The children will continue the heritage of the race. When Vichitra Veerya lost life due to the extreme enjoyment in lust and luxuries, his mother Sathya vathi recalled her son Vyasa Maharishi to come to her. When he came, she requested him to have children with her daughter in laws. He fulfilled his mother's wish. There were no immoral thoughts and intuitions. Then how it is immoral? Regarding this matter, I can give you more clear narration as follows.
When Santana Maharaja had seen Satyavathi Devi and asked her father DasaRaja for her hand, he put the condition to make her would be son as king. In fact, DasaRaja was not real father of Satyawathi. He was bringing up her. Actually, she was the daughter of Uparichara Vasuvu and Adrika. DasaRaja kept his adopted daughter in the duty of boating to carry travelers from one bank to other bank of the river.
This DasaRaja, the king of the wild animal hunters, when the king Santhana requested to give his adopted daughter to marry, he put such conditions, because of his immaturity and desire. The result of it was the war Kurukshtram. Because of this demand of DasaRaja, Devavrath i.e. Gangeya, the son of Santana pledged himself to the bachelorship. [i.e. not touching women]. Because of the withdrawal of capable and eligible prince from his kingdom, the bad natured Duryodhana etc could lead the kingdom to the state of war.
Beside this, when DasaRaja put the condition of giving thrown to the would be child of Satyawathi, king Santana felt sad and returned his capital city i.e. Hasthina puri.
Gangeya watched the sadness of his father. When he requested his father to tell the reason, Santana said, "Dear son. You are my only son. I felt satisfaction with you as if I have 100 sons. But you are great worrier. So that I fear about you that, you may get danger at any time. If such happens, our race will get destroy. That's why I'm feeling sad."
Hence, the king indirectly expressed his desire to have re marriage. His intuition was expressed like that. If he really wanted to have the development of race, he could get marry of his son Gangeya with suitable girl and could have grand children. By that time, Gangeya was aged about 20+ years. That means he was not a kid.
Gangeya noticed the intuition of Santana, approached DasaRaja and fulfilled his condition by declaring as "I'm leaving crown by now itself. I won't touch woman so that I won't get children. From now, till my death I will live as bachelor."
By pledging like this, he became as 'Bheshma', that means a man who committed severe pledge. To make his father happy, he sacrificed his life. For this, Santana had given a boon to him to have death whenever he wants. That means he can live up to his will or desire or up to the time he like.
Here the king Santana's real desire was to marry Satyawathi. But he shown the cause to Devavrath i.e. Gangeya as desire to have sons. In fact, he got two sons Chithrangada and Vichitra Veera by Satyawathi. He passed away when these princes were young boys. Out of them Chitrangada was killed by a Gandharya by name Chithrangada and Vichithra Veerya dead with disease which he got because of his extreme enjoyment of sex.
Hence, the real desire of Santana, to get remarriage was only fulfilled because that was his intuition. His so-called desire i.e. to have sons for the development of his race was not fulfilled because that was not his real desire or intuition. Such that intuition to say or intuition to do is more important than what we say or what we do.
I continue the characterization of Bheeshma Pitamaha i.e. Grandfather to Kouravas and Pandavas. When his both stepbrothers were died, his stepmother Satyawathi asked him to get marry for the sake of kingdom. But he refused it. He committed to his pledge only. He was so capable, knowledgeous, worrier, obedient to elders and teachers, and self-judge. After sacrifying the kingdom, he never thought that it was his kingdom. He considered himself as a sub ordinate to the king Dhrutha rashtra. He never over looked him. Always he tried to guide Dhrutharashtra and Duryodhana to follow the righteous way i.e. Dharma. But whenever they take their own decision, he followed it as a subordinate. At the time of Drawpadi Vasthrapaharam i.e. insulting Droupadi Devi by trying to make her nude, at the time of fraud playing of dice, at the time of cows theft at the South Gate of Virata King and in many contexts, he tried his level best to prevent the blind King Drutharashtra and Kouravas from doing bad, but in vain. Unavoidably, he took part in their activities and ultimately the war Kurukshetra. Though he was capable to prevent all those, he didn't. That's why only, in spite of free will to have death at his willingful time as a boon from his father, he punished himself by waiting up to Uttarayanam at the battlefield on the bed of arrows. It was real hell on the earth. Thus, he was self-justice.
With his role, we can learn so many morals. He praised Sri Krishna, with respective the knowledge, though Sri Krishna was younger to him. He preached so many things to Dharma Raja and others after the battle of Kurukshetra. But because of his support to sins of Kouravas, he got his punishment on this earth and in hell. Though he got heaven, which is eligible to the worriers dead in the war, he deserved his punishment.
According to Indians believes, whatever we do good or bad, we will have the result of those good and bad, both on the earth and in the other worlds. According to Indians believes, there are so many worlds i.e. 14 lokas. Among those, heaven and hell are there, where the people's souls will go after the death. According to the amount of good things and sins, the souls will spend at heaven and hell. There will be the reward in heaven for good works, as well as living in hell will be the punishment for bad works. Naturally, all the people will do some good and some bad. So they will live both in heaven and in hell. If they do much good, they live long time in heaven and less time in hell. They first live in hell for relative short time and then live proportionate long time in heaven. If they do much bad, they live long time in hell and less time in heaven.
These people first go to heaven, live there for short time and then go to hell to live long time. That's why our elders, our epics, our culture and all our life style always remind us to do good things. This concept was explained in detail in the Mahaprasthana Parvam in Mahabharatham.
In case, if there are no heaven and hell, if it is only a blind belief, but this belief of hell and heaven keep people under control, and it prevent the people from doing sin. By joking on these believes, by making ridiculer critics on these believes the coup makers i.e. CIA, ISI, Ramoji Rao and their supporters had provocated the people to become immoral.
In the context of Dasaratha, while considering the boons given to Kaika as sending Sri Rama to forest for 14 years, the coup makers and their supporters argued as "If Dasaratha was so loving father to Sri Rama, then why didn't he stop Sri Rama to go to forest by getting ready to go to hell?"
If Dasaratha done such by throwing away the believes of hell and heaven, all the people would follow it. Whenever they find difficulty, they also would follow which ever would be favorable to them. Then what will happen in the world? That's why he preferred death to the throwing away of the believes.
Because, the law and order, the Government rules, the constitution of a country, the police and intelligence departments of a country, cannot control the people. They cannot motivate the people to do good acts and they cannot prevent the people from doing bad acts. Because everybody will think that, he is cleaver than others. So that nobody either Govt. or private can notice the activities whatever one does. Because the Governments, the rules, the law and order, or the police etc departments need the witness and that to they also human beings but not super men.
Where as, the religion and the religious believes are regarding God. No human being can think that he is greater than God, or clever than God. God needs no witness. Unlike the Government, God is capable to give punishment, so that believes can control the people. Believes can motivate the people to do good works. Believes can prevent the people from doing bad works. The epics are the base to believe. By demolishing 'the believes', it is easy to lead the people to be uncontrollable to Govt., and to lead the people to immoral. Then it will be easy to the coup makers and their supporters to make the people to do treachery to their mother country. Are we not watching the disputes of fake passports, spying coups against parent country, terrorism and help to terrorism, cheats and murders etc etc etc immorality as demo to this strategy?
Let us return to Mahabharatham. When Chitrangada died, Bheeshma made Vichitra Veerya as king. He brought the three daughters of KasiRaja, Amba, Ambika and Ambalika by wining war at the time of their 'Swayam Vara' to get marry to his stepbrother Vichitra Veerya. Among them Amba told him as she loved Salwa King and he also loved her and she wanted to marry him. Bheeshma sent her to Salwa King and performed his brother's marriage with Ambika and Ambalika. Kasi King placed nice and rhythmic names to his daughters. But Salwa King rejected Amba as he was defeated by Bheeshma to win her hand. She returned to Bheeshma and demanded him to marry her. He rejected the proposal she wandered and approached Parasu Rama to make justice to her, but in vain. She didn't like to go to parents. She did penance and get boon to kill Bheeshma. In next birth, she born to Drupada as girl, later turned into boy by name Sikhandi, she caused death to Bheeshma. This idea of story reminds us now a day's sex changing operations, such that our epics can give inspiration to think innovative.
When Vichitra Veerya had dead without children, Satyawati requested Bheeshma to marry and to get children. But he refused, she reminded her son Veda Vyasa. He came, she requested him to have children with Ambika and Ambalika. When Vyasa Maharishi went to the bedroom of Ambika, with fear and dislike, as Vyas was a saint, but not a handsome prince or king, she closed her eyes. She got a blind son Druthrashtra due to the Mathru Dosham. When Vyasa Maharishi went to Ambika, her face became white with bloodlessness. She got a son with anemia, PanduRaja. Satyawathi again requested him to have a healthy child with Ambika. This time Ambika sent her servant maid. Vyasa Maharishi said "Mother. This time Ambika sent her servant maid. I transplanted the cursed soul of God Yama in her womb."
Thus, Vidura born, and he was a beautiful character in Mahabhartham. Vidura Neethi was so great and useful to everybody in life. Here, the widows of Vichitra Veerya didn't engage with Veda Vyasa Maharishi for the sake of lust, luxury or wealth, same case with Vyasa Maharishi. And it was not a secret act or hide out activity, to say immoral. All the elders know it and the queen Satyawathi ordered to do so. Then how the son of Dhrutharashtra, Duryodhana criticizes it, as immoral at the time of Kshatra Pariksha? Actually, Duryodhana said to Bheema sena, after the Kshathra Pariksha, after the making of Karna as the king of Anga by Duryodhana, when Bheema ridiculed Karna, then Duryodhana said about the births of Pandavas. But in the movie like Dhana Veera Sura Karna, Sri Krishna Pandaveeyam and Virata Parvam etc, Mr. NTR and other coup supporters like him had shown in their movies as Duryodhana criticized the birth of Vyasa Maharishi, Druthrashtra and PanduRaja, Vidura and Pandavas. Such that they had shown that Duryodhana as worst than he was in Maha Bharatham but the presentations of this character in those movies was as if he was more frank, great with self respect, good and had no emotions i.e. arishadwargas as jealousy, pride etc. A hero worship almost was built to Duryodhana and positive image to Dushta Chatushtyam i.e. Duryodhana, Dussasana, Karna and Sakuni. Another propaganda about Duryodhana was, about his temple at Kerala state. I don't know where it was located actually. But the then propaganda was as if Duryodhana was more fair and frank enough, he was not a hypocrite like Dharma Raja. Dharma Raja and other pandavas were crucked, they were capable to pretend good and obedient by keeping their evil nature in hidden. To project such, so many Prakshipthams, scripts, dialogues the coup makers and their supporters created in cinemas, books etc media. I'll try to give detail description regarding this coup.
In fact, the scriptwriter of the movie Dana Veera Sura Karna was Konda Veeti Venkata Kavi, a Sanskrit scholar. Mr. NTR had made him to accept the proposed of script writing, with good afford. Mr. Kondaveeti Venkata Kavi was a well-known atheist. When an atheist writes the script of an epic story, it is natural that such presentation of un accomplishment in the dialogues and in the script. Another thundering light was that Mr. Kondaveeti Venkata Kavi was 'The then principal to Govt. Sanskrit Collage'. That was the level of coup on Hinduism. Can any atheist in Allah occupy any higher seat in any Islam related institute? Can any atheist in Jesus Christ occupy any higher seat in any Christian related institute? But it is easy by Government in case of Hindu related institutes.
Actually same strategy, the coup makers and their supporters followed in the case of Ramayanam also, by propagating Sri Rama, Lakshmana, Sita etc positive characters as hypocrites, exhibiting positive nature by hiding the evil nature and Raavana, Kumbhakarna, Surpanakha, Vaali etc negative characters as frank and fair enough to express their evil nature. By the way, strategically and successfully they succeeded in presenting the negative characters of the Indian epics are truthful, than the positive characters.
In fact, this is the crooked nature and Thamasa Budhi. In Moksha Sanyasa Yogam, 18-32 slokam in Bhagavad Geetha explains this to us in very clear manner.'
To picturise like this, the coup makers and their supporters like Mr. NTRama Rao, created some Prakshipthams and wantedly propagated some more Prakshipthams, which means imaginary stories irrespective of original Mahabharatham written by Vyasa Maharishi.
For example, the character of Sakuni. Actually, in Mahabharatham Sakuni was the brother of Gandhari, the wife of Dhrutharashtra and the mother of Duryodhana. He was the prince of Gandhara Desa, but he migrated to Hasthina along with his sister. He didn't have eligibility to become the king of Gandhara, as he was not the elder son of Subala, the king of Gandhara. If he stays at Gandhara Desa, he would be one of the princess. But if he stays at Hasthina Puri, he could be the only brother in law of King, he could be the only brother of queen and he would be the only uncle of prince Duryodhana. So happily, he settled at Hasthina puri. In Hasthina Puri, by provocation the jealousy on Pandavas, he had became the guide and leader of Kouravas. Such that, the character of Sakuni was bad.
To project him as positive, these cinema people, especially Mr. NTR projected a story of flash back to Sakuni. According to that story:- In the childhood, one day Kouravas were playing with other friends. One of the friends had scolded Duryodhana as "Son of a widow." He got angry by that. He enquired into the matter. In Gandhari's horoscope, there was a fault that she would become widow after her marriage. To avoid that, her father Subala had performed a devotional precautionary program and got married her to a ram. After the marriage with Ram, the male sheep, he killed it and performed the program of making Gandhari as widow. After this, without revealing this event, they performed her marriage with Drutharashtra. Duryodhana came to know all of this flash back. Because he was ferocious and could not bear any blame and shame, he attacked on his grandfather's Kingdom i.e. Gandhara Desam, defeated them and kept his grandfather Subala along with his 100 sons including Sakuni in the prison. Sakuni was the youngest son to Subala. In the prison, Duryodhana had given 100 boiled rice grains to all of them as daily food.
So that totally their race was in danger. Hence, Sabala ordered all of his own sons not to eat that food grains. If all of they share such less food, all of them would die due to starvation. That's why he ordered all of sons to die with hunger except the youngest son Sakuni. He selected him to take revenge on Duryodhana. He selected Sakuni because he was younger so that he could live relatively long time to his brothers. One more reason for such selection was Subala had confidence on the intelligence of Sakuni. Within short period, due to starvation all of his brothers and father were dead. While dieing, his father, Subala ordered Sakuni to make dice with the bones of his spinal card, and that dice would draw face of number according to the will of Sakuni.
Every day, by watching the death of his brothers one by one and finally his father's death due to starvation, Sakuni used to eat the daily diet of 100 food grains; Sakuni had preserved his revenge in the heart. Every day he used to motivate himself to live, by chanting the word "Revenge … Revenge."
After some days, Duryodhana watched the prison and noticed that all of the brothers of Sakuni and his father were dead and with such limited food, Sakuni could manage to live. Sakuni tried to please Duryodhana. Duryodhana impressed by him and released him from prison. Gradually Sakuni influenced Duryodhana and provoked jealousy in him regarding Pandavas. He motivated him to proceed in evil way. He increased ego in Duryodhana. This led them to battle at Kurukshetra. By the way, he destroyed the total race of kowravas as revenge.
In fact, this was not in the original Mahabharatham of Vyasa Maharishi. In this imaginary story, there were so many defects. In the childhood itself, how Duryodhana defeated Gandhara king Subala and his sons? If he was such capable why didn't he succeeded along with Karna, to capture king Drupada to present him as a Guru Dakshina to Drona?
If coup supporters argue as "Might be Duryodhana was not capable to defeat Drupada, but capable to defeat Subala." The reply to the above argument is – in such case, why didn't the Kaurava's including Duryodhana and Karna defeat the Gandharva at the time of Ghosha Yatra? Why didn't they defeat one person i.e. Arjuna at the time of Dakshina Gograhanam? On the other hand, while Duryodhana was imprisoning his grandfather Subala, the king of Gandhara Desa along with his sons, what the elders in Hasthina puri, Bheeshma, Vidura, Dhrutharashtra and Gandhari were doing? Wouldn't they stop him? Whenever Duryodhana was doing harm to Pandavas, all the saints including Mytheya, Vyasa Maharishi etc all the elders had warned him, tried to control him, counseled him to prevent evil doing. Such elders, such saints would allow Duryodhana to keep his grandfather and his sons in prison? Gandhari could allow him to kill them by starvation?
By motivating Kouravas jealousy, by driving them in evil path, ultimately to battle with Pandavas, what Sakuni could get? In the battle, how he could satisfy his revenge? All the kouravas were killed in the war. At the same time, Sakuni along with his all of the sons like Ulukudu etc were killed. What did he get in return of revenge? The director, Mr. NTR in his Movies like Sri Krishna Pandaveeyam, Dana Veera Sura Karna etc with his own production, didn't focus on this point. If the coup supporters argue that there are such illogic's, non connective, non time sense contexts in the other parts of the Mahabharatham and in other Prakshiptham, then why are you blaming and claiming regarding the Prakshipthams of Sakuni and Mr. NTR who created or worked to propagate it and to popular it? My answer is intuition of the Prakshiptham. As I explained in the Ramayanam regarding the Prakshiptham of squirrel help, the intuition in fabrication of a story is important. With the story, with the concept, with the narration and totally with that fabrication, what the creator of that story wants to project is important. If they create such stories without thinking the impact of that work i.e. creating a story, on the society, then it is their irresponsibility towards the society. The over leaf reason is irresponsibility. But the root is, support to the coup. They had shown such irresponsibility towards the society with a beautiful argument as "The cinema is to entertain the people, to bring the people to theater, we are telling the story interestingly and we picture it attractively. It is all business and making money. It is all art but not message giving or preaching ethics. Now a day's people are not hearing if we give messages or preach. After all, they are coming to theatre to forget their worries and to relax. So that, to entertain them, we are presenting the new stories and old stories in a new way." By supporting the coup like this, the then directors, artists like NTR got a tremendous carrier in field and grip over the field. Such that, the others could noticed the grip of God fathers i.e. coup makers in the cinema field. Like that, the network had flourished. The present situation is in front of your eyes and sensible by your mind.
As in the part of this support to the coup on epics, the coup supporters like NTR and other cine people wanted to project positive image on Dushta Chatusthayam i.e. Sakuni, Duryodhana, Dussasana and Karna. In case of Sakuni, he supported all the villony, evil nature of Sakuni by giving a cause of revenge to that character. It resembles to the sympathy drawing stories on the psychopath serial killer characters of now-a-days movies like Yerra Gulabeelu i.e. red roses, Anasuya, Seshu, Ohm etc etc. In fact, the next era of epic story based movies, the era of the social story based movies was in turn. It was around 1980 to 1992. All the stories were based on revenge only. One Villon would kill the parents and other family members of the hero, in his childhood itself. After becoming young, hero would take revenge on the Villon. With the same concept of revenge, hundreds of movies from Zanjeer etc in Hindi up to Veeta, Gang Leader etc in Telugu, were exhibited in theatres. Such that the concept of 'revenge taking' was made to penetrate into the people especially into the youth brain.
In fact, everybody in life will get something harm or something in-favor by others. For such, it everybody concentrates on 'revenge taking' how will be the world. Now we are watching, some murder cases in which the motive of crime is as simple as little harm or mistake by killed one, to killer. Recently we read news on daily paper that a boy of 14 years killed another boy of equal age. The reason was, while cycling, ones leg touched the killer and the killer treated it as if the victim had insulted him by beating with leg. Are we not reading this type of news on newspaper? Are we not watching such real crime stories on T.V. channels? The beginnings of these situations were those only.
Another character in Dushtachatushtayam, which means four evil personal in Mahabharatham was Duryodhana. He was the other form or replica Kali Purusha.
Regarding his birth, the original story in Vyasa Bharatham was as follows. Kunti Devi had given birth to Dharma Raja, such that he became the elder prince in the race. In fact, because of the blindness, Dhrutharashtra was not eligible to rule the country. PanduRaja was made as king of Kuru Rajya. He defeated so many other kings and made his country wide and strong. While going on holiday trip, he made his brother Dhrutharashtra as Superior boss i.e. King to the country and went on. While enjoying the nature beauty at the Himalayas, he watched a couple of deers, which were engaged in sex. Without humanity, generosity and minimum thinking, Panduraja killed female deer by arrow. Actually, the deers were not deers really. A saint by name Kindamudu, along with his wife, had taken the shape of deers and enjoying time with the help of his magic power of penance. The saint cursed Panduraja as "Oh! King! You came here for a shire along with your two queens. Won't you have ethics? A hard-core hunter also doesn't kill any living being while they are in mating and while they are giving birth to their young ones. Being king, you had done such a severe sin. So that, you are eligible to have a curse. Whenever you touch a woman with the feeling of having sex, you will die immediately". PanduRaja trembled like a climber in cyclone, felt sorry and repentance.
By referring this, I read an essay in between 1980 to 85. I remember author was Ranga Nayakamma, but I'm not sure of it. But who ever may be writer of that essay, argued as "What nonsense in this story? Who knows that a saint and his wife are enjoying sex in the shape of deers? Won't the saints have another work? Can't they enjoy the sex in the shape of human beings? By having such perverted desires of sex, how they could be said a saints? By not knowing that those deers are saint and his wife, when PanduRaja killed one of the deers, how he was eligible to get a curse?"
In this episode, the deers might be human beings or deers. But is it not a sin to kill any living beings, while they engaged in sex? To, a hunter whose occupation is hunting animals to earn life food, it is a sin to kill animals while they engaged in sex, because at that time those animals will not be in conscious of the remaining world. It is natural phenomena. If the hunters kill them at that moments, the echo balance will get destroy. The population growth of animals will decrease. The bio diversity and natural equilibrium will get disturb. We are experiencing such bad effects now on the earth. To prevent such crime and sin, the episode of PanduRaja's curse in Mahabharatham is useful. Without understanding that 'Atma Thatwam' if any writers argue, if any coup supporter argues, what we can do, except putting a salute to them?
Let us return to the original story. By receiving the curse, PanduRaja recognized the defects of hunting addiction and got ready to become as a monk. His wives Kunti and Madri convinced him to practice Vanaprastha life, which means living like saints instead of monk. He sent the emperor symbols such as crown etc, to Hasthina puri along with the message of happenings. Bheeshma etc elders felt sad about it. Bheeshma made Drutharashtra as alternate king and ruled the kingdom on behalf of his name. Days passed. PanduRaja along with his wives was on pilgrimage to many forests, and mountains. He reached Satha Shrunga Mountain. There, one day while chatting with Saints he said,
"Oh! Great saints! You know that a human being have debts to fore fathers, to Deities i.e. Devine to saints and to other human beings. With Yagna, we can clear the debt to divine i.e. Deities. With penance and divine poojas, we can clear the debt to Saints. With kind generosity and donation, we can clear the debt to other human beings. With cremation, and other performances after the death of elders, we can clear the debt of fore fathers. Because I have no children, I'm the most unlucky man in this world!"
By this conversation, Vyasa Maharishi had given information to sociology and to society. Being social member, human being has four responsibilities, and those responsibilities are to fore fathers, to Devine deities, to saints and to other human beings respectively. In ancient days, there were no modern transport facilities and machinery to use petrol and diesel etc fuels. Such that, to form clouds, dust, water vapor made by sunlight due to evaporations were only available but not smoke. The smoke produced by burning wood for cooking was not sufficient. For that sake, "Yagna" a devotional program was patronized in those days. Kings, Emperors, rich businessmen, saints and Brahmin scholars used to perform 'Yagna' in which smoke was produced by pouring cow's ghee on burning wood in countable quantities. While doing such Yagna's, donations were given to poor people and to scholars, saints, and Brahmins. With such Yagna's, the responsibility or debt towards the God, divine and deities can be fulfilled, similar case to saints and other human beings. Every person is liable to the debt to fore fathers, because they had given life to us. To clear their debt, we have to develop the race i.e. having good children to get fame to the race. Performing Shradha Karma, which means performing needful programs after the death of elders and the same on every anniversary, is not meant only for it. It is a physical symbol of expressing our gratitude and thankfulness to fore fathers. In fact, the spiritual symbol is getting fame to their name, by the way to our race, is the real 'Shradha Karna'. That's why only there is a tradition of constructing educational institutes, social welfare buildings, bus stops, and old age homes, orphanages, giving scholarships to poor and merit students, giving donations to devotional and social service programs on behalf of the name of elders in human society.
This was remarked by PanduRaja in his conversation with saint. The saints said "PanduRaja! Don't get disgusted. When a man is not in such a situation to have children naturally, they can practice the other methods. It is not immoral."
By the way, there was a thought provocation of sperm donation, womb utility service and test tube babies' creation in Mahabharatham. I'm not saying that "అన్ని వేదాలలోనే ఉన్నాయి" which means every science innovation of modern days are in the Vedas only. I'm not such egoistic or blind admiring or fan to Vedas and ancient Indian epics. That's why I'm refereeing the thought provocation of such miracles in the Mahabharatham and other Sanskrit literature. Because of such thought provocation only, in Germany and in other countries, there are Sanskrit educational institutes such as universities. Because of such thought provocation only, so many foreign scientists are studying Sanskrit, reading daily Sri Bhagavad Geetha, whereas, we Indians are referring the satire of Sri Gurajada Mahakavi, without considering his feeling in it. He put such satire on the ego of the then scholars, Brahmins and the society, because they were egoistic to accept the good qualities of British and other foreign countries. Wherever and whenever there is good and truth we have to accept it and wherever and whenever there is bad and false, we have to drop it. Without practicing this, when some people self boosted up, Sri Gurajada put those satires. By using this opportunity, happily, strategically the coup makers i.e. Mr. Ramoji Rao, C.I.A. and I.S.I. and their supporters used the epics, Sanskrit literature and ancient Indian culture until Indians feel shy to praise and practice the concept and idealism of Indian epics and Indian culture. In this angle, this is the mode of implementation of coup.
Let us return to the original story of Mahabharatham. PanduRaja had put a proposal to Kunti Devi. He said "Oh! The daughter of Surasena, Kunti! I feel that my life is waste without children. That's why I request you to give birth to children for my sake. There is a concept of twelve divisions in children by name related cousins and nonrelated cousins. Among those 12 divisions, the children got birth by the engage with the best man is called as praneetha. I'm ordering you to have children in that way."
When she refused his proposal he could convinced her. Then she said, "Oh King! When I was in my adopted father Kunti Bhoja's house, one day Duruvasa Mahamuni came to our house as a guest. I served him carefully. He was pleased at me and had given a boon to me. With the help of boon mantra, I can call the divine deities to give children to me."
PanduRaja accepted it and she chanted the magic word and welcomed God Yama. He accepted it and presented her Dharma Raja. God Yama was the son of God Surya. He knows Atma Gnana. He was the ruler of the hell, i.e. Naraka Loka. He was called as Sama Varthi, which means he could behave without partiality to anybody or to any issue. He could behave always with balance of mind. Because of his boon, Dharma Raja born, that's why only, Dharma Raja's behavior was such nice in Mahabharatham. He never lies. He never behaves in rude manner. He never disobey the elders, degrade the younger's. He never practices any immoral. The birth of Vidura also related with God Yama, Vidura also such a nice and knowledgeous person in Mahabharatham. Regarding such God Yama, how many jovial movies came in Telugu cinema field? Here also, major part goes to the account of Mr. NTR. In black and white, some movies by name Devanthakudu acted by NTR was produced. In color movie era, a movie by name Yama gola was there with him as hero. God Yama and Chitra Gupta were picturized as comedians in a socio fantasy movie. They were the deities who were capable to record what about of crores of crores of living beings. Such deities, won't they know about the modern developments of this world such as chocolates, ice creams, flights, rockets and T.V. cinema and computers? Can they get mesmerize by seeing the half-nude club dancers? If it is pictures only to entertain the people, can they entertain like that on the concepts of Christianity, Islam? Can they pictures only to entertain on the historical people like Alexander and Akbar, Shaw Jahan etc Muslim kings? Only on Hindu deities, they could produce jovial movies. It is utterly coup on Hinduism and Indian idealism. If any coup supporters argue that, "You are saying that the coup makers and their supporters had picturised the jovial movies on Hindu deities. Who ever produced such movies, you are saying that those are coup supporters. In such case, why are you not saying that all the people are coup supporters, because they watched such movies and they are watching such movies now also?"
For this, reply argument is as follows. In cinema field, a paradox of 'people are producing such movies so that we are watching and people are watching such movies so that we are producing' about which I explained in my topic under the caption 'COUP ON CINEMA FIELD'. That is one reason. Another important reason is Indians and especially Hindus are peace-loving people. Their attitude is "who ever do sin, they will receive its bad effects. God will look after all the things." More over Hindu's tolerance range is very high. By the way, they tolerated and entertained all the critics, jokes on their religion. Their way of protest is different. They bared the entire exploitation and robbery by British, but when they started to protest it, and to oppose it, they took the truth and non-violence way under the leader ship of Mahatma Gandhi. Such is Indian nature, Hindu nature. Regarding everything including coup on religion and epics, their nature is thus.
By this way, I'm not supporting or praising Indians. Whenever a coup or cheat is happened, how much responsibility is there to coup makers that much responsibility is there to the victims? The victims must be cautious, alert and clever to recognize the coup or cheat. They should not be careless. If they allow the coup makers to implement the coup by knowingly or unknowingly, they should pay the penalty in their life without reference of law and order, but with reference of fate.
To these coup makers, to these coup supporters such as moviemakers, directors, artists and actress, if a single second when the event of death stay in their front, everybody will get heart attack. Such we had read on news papers, when the flight was landed accidentally in rice fields by the pilot R.P.Bhalla around in 1995, the cinema heroes like Chiranjeevi, Bala Krishna etc and cinema heroines like Vijaya Santhi etc how much dareness [cowardness] they had shown at the moment. Every body of us has that much of fear to death. Then, how fearless and devotion less that the cine people to picturise God Yama and Chitra Gupta to show as comedy makers? There is same case with Narada Maharishi. He was the divine saint, very generous to human beings. His character was very wise, intellectual and scholar. He was the son of Brahma Deva. He was "ఆజన్మ బ్రహ్మచారి" which means never get marriage and "చిరంజీవి" which means a man having no death. He used to wander all the worlds of 14 in number as per Indian epics, by chanting Srimannrayana's name. By leaving all of these great qualities of Narada Maharishi, the cinema people had given an image as Narada Maharishi always create quarrels among people, such that they successfully dragged this Maharishi's character to comedian status. I can give detail description on this point in the later part of this writing and the topic coup on Indian epics.
Now let us return to the story of original Mahabharatham. When Kunti Devi delivered Dharma Raja, by hearing such news, Gandhari felt jealousy. She had beaten her own womb with the emotions of grievance, angry and jealousy. By the way, her semi formed baby had fallen out of her womb that means she got abortion. She cried out like anything. By that time, Vyasa Maharishi came there. He saved that semi formed baby's life and body. He divided it into 101 parts by mixing it with cold water and preserved them in 101 mud pots filled with Ghee. In one, word the then creation of test tube baby. Here one more interesting feature, we have to notice. Vyasa maharishi never felt Dhrutharashtra, PanduRaja as his sons and Pandavas as his grandsons. He was a real Maharishi, having no bondages, but he had affection on total human beings and living beings. He had given birth to Dhrutharashta, PanduRaja and Vidura as a duty because his mother Satyavathi ordered him to do so. That's all!
After two years, the babies started to born from the pots. The first baby, Duryodhana born in the pot, coincidently Kunti delivered a boy, Bheema Sena with the boon of God Vayu i.e. Air. Bheema Sena was so strong, because he was the son of God Pavana i.e. Air. When Duryodhana born, he brayed like an ass. Natural disasters were occurred. People feared. Drutharashtra called on elders and scholars and said, "In our race, Dharma Raja was the eldest prince that to son of PanduRaja. He will become the future king. Is there any possibility to become my son as king at least after Dharma Raja?"
They said, "Oh! King! By watching all these disasters, it seems that your son will become the destroyer to your race and to our country. It is better to leave him now itself. The science of ethics tells us that we have to leave person for the sake of race, we have to leave our race for the sake of village, we have to leave village for the sake of country and we have to leave the world for the sake of soul development".
Being loving father, he didn't leave his son Duryodhana. Kunti gave birth to Arjuna with the boon of Devendra, the king of Deities. Among three sons of Kunti, Dharma Raja born with the boon of God Yama, so that he was famous for his ethical behavior; Bheema born with the boon of God Vayu, so that he was famous for physical strength; Arjuna born with the boon of God Indra, so that he was famous for archery. In expecting sons from deities. Kunti Devi didn't consider her own desires; she considered the characteristic values in sons, because she had enough life experience by that time. She already crossed such desires. In the context of birth of Karna, I'll give detailed description of this.
By watching all this, Madri, the second wife of PanduRaja requested him to have children with the help of magic word boon of Kunti Devi. Kunti Devi revealed it to Madri. She chanted it twice and welcomed Aswini deities who were twins as per epic of Ksheera Sagara Madhanam. She got twin sons Nakula and Sahadeva. While welcoming the deities with the help of magic word, she considered her own desire rather than the characteristic values of sons. She selected the handsome twin deities and she got handsome twin sons. Though Nakula and Sahadeva were skilled in sword using war art, they were not as famous as Kunti sons i.e. Dharma Raja, Bheema and Arjuna were. Nakula had a talent to handle the sword in rain without getting wet of the sword. He could prevent the falling of single drop of rain on his sword while using it in the rain. He had known how to handle the horses. Sahadeva was talented in sword fight. He had known how to look after the cattle.
In Mahabharatham, Bheema sena's character was fascinating one to children and youth. How children and youth of now days are fascinating towards cricket stars like Sachin, Dhoni etc and fascinating towards cinema heroes, the children and youth of those days were fascinated towards Bheema Sena and Anjaneya. Now-a-days also, wherever these epics are familiar to children, those children fascinate towards Bheema and Hanuman, the sons of God Vayu.
Some Prakshipthams regarding Bheema Sena, I tell you. Actually, I don't know whether these are Prakshipthams or in real story of Vyasa Bharatham. According to that, when Bheema Sena was months baby, one day Kunti Devi was feeding her breast milk to him. By mistake, he had fallen onto the ground from her lap. She felt worried. When she lifted him from floor and observed whether he got any hurt. Surprise! He didn't hurt. The stone on which he had fallen down was broken into pieces. In my childhood, whenever my parents said "Won't you want to become as strong as Bheema and Anjaneya? If you want to become so, eat food without making nonsense." immediately all of we including my brothers and sisters used to finish our lunch and dinner without troubling our parents. Same experience I had with my daughter.
If this is Prakshiptham, nothing harm from it, because its intuition is positive i.e. to motivate the children, youth and people to become as strong as Bheema. As per the original story of Mahabharatham, in the childhood during games, Kouravas were not able to competete with Bheema Sena. Duryodhana felt jealousy towards Pandavas, especially towards Bheema.
Duryodhana thought about a plan. He arranged a picnic on a riverbank. All the children of Kauravas and Pandavas played there a lot, and ate well. During the play, time Duryodhana mixed poison in the food of Bheema Sena. By eating such poisonous food, by night Bheema became unconscious. Duryodhana tied him with ropes and dropped him in the river. Bheema reached the bottom of sea through the river. There some poisonous snakes had bitten him. The snakes poison worked as medicine to the poison ate by Bheema. He got consciousness. By that time, he reached the world of snakes; there he fought with snake worriers. Their king Vasuki enquired about him along with his senior citizen Aryaka. Aryaka recognized him, as the son of Kunti and Kunti was his great granddaughter. They treated him well. They gave him Nagamrutha, the drink that could give strength. Bheema drank eight pots of it, so that he got the strength of eight thousands of elephants. He returned safely to the palace.
Such that, when Duryodhana wanted to create evil to the Pandavas, it turned as good to them. By referring this story, Indians used to remind this moral. They used to think that if one person thinks something, God thinks something else "తానొకటి తలిస్తే దైవం మరొకటి తలచు".
Let us refer the Prakshiptham story of Gaja Gouri Vratham. Gandhari wanted to perform some divine program to get good effects to Kauravas. Narada Maharishi explained her about performing of Gaja Gouri Vratham. For that sake, 100 members of Kauravas made a mud elephant. In that devotion, wantedly Gandhari degraded Kunti. By getting ferociousness, Bheema, Arjuna had efforted to bring Iravatham, the divine elephant to the earth to celebrate the devotional Pooja. Kunti performed Gaja Gouri Vratham and respected Gandhari by giving first gift to her.
By referring this story, though it was Prakshiptham, Indians used to mind the moral 'what is the use of having bad sons in multiple number? It is better to have a single good and capable son or child instead of many bad and incapable children.
In the story of Markandeya Maharshi, who was blessed by God Siva as Chiranjeevi, which means a person having no death, the same concept was there. A maharishi Mrukanda had no children. He and his wife did penance to God Siva. When God Siva appeared to them and asked to express their desire, they prayed him for children. God Siva said, "If you want many sons having long life of 100 years but evil children, I can give you. If you want one good son but not having long life, i.e. could live only up to 16 years, I can give you. What is your choice?"
Mrukanda Maharishi and his wife desired one good. Such was the commitment of ancient Indians towards the good and truth. They could get ready to bare the grievance of losing loving son instead of having bad sons, though they could live long time of 100 years.
After 15 years, when he came to know about his own life scan, Markandeya sat on penance to please God Siva. God Siva pleased at him, he gave deathless life to him. To make him deathless, God Siva got ready to change the rules of God Yama. Such that it was proved that, a good and truthful man or person can make impossible to possible. This Markandeya maharishi, motivated Dharma Raja by telling the stories of Nala Maharaja, Sri Rama who faced so many difficulties to protect Dharma, when Dharma Raja got desperation during the time of forest living.
One more small reference about Markandeya Maharishi:- One day, Narada Maharishi met a group of saints. He greeted Markandeya Maharishi. The remaining saints asked him "Oh! Narada Maharishi! You are the son of Brahma Deva, You born earlier to Markandeya Maharishi. Both of you are 'Chiranjeevees' i.e. the persons living long without death. Then why you are respecting Markandeya Maharishi as if he is elder to you?"
Narada Maharishi said, "Oh! Saints! When we are measuring the food grains with a measuring vessel, we take good grains by leaving in quality grains and bran. Like that, we have to consider the lifetime spent in devotion, chanting and good acts by leaving the lifetime wasted for un-nesseccessary things. If we consider the time of good spending as the real age, Markandeya Maharishi is elder to me. That's why I put 'Namaskar' to him."
What a truth it is! After all in food grains, we consider only quality grains, and we leave the in quality grains. In such case, what about the moments of time in our life? If we think like that, can we waste limitless time for the entertainment with T.V. internet and gambling's?
By leaving all of this, our cinema people projected Narada Maharishi as a comedian who could create quarrels among others. Narada Maharishi was very kind and affectionate towards the human beings and all living beings. In Vishnu Puranam, he asked God Vishnu "Hai! Bhagavan i.e. God! All the human beings and living beings are facing difficulties, and taking births repeatedly at different mothers' wombs each and every time on the earth. Please tell me a way to save them from their sorrows and pains".
One more story I'll tell you. I read it somewhere. I don't know whether it is Prakshiptham or in original epics.
One day, Narada Maharishi asked God Vishnu, "Swami! I am always chanting your name with devotion. I have a desire. I want to know who dearest devotee to you is. Please let me know."
God Vishnu smiled. He noticed that a bit of ego in Narada Maharishi. He said, "Look Narada! Look on to the earth." He watched in the direction shown by God Vishnu. There was a poor farmer on the earth. He felt wonder. He wanted to check how the farmer was the dearest devotee to God Vishnu. He observed the poor farmer in invisible form. Early in the morning, while he was getting up of the bed, the farmer said "Namo Narayana". He started his daily work. He cleaned the cattle farms. He fed them. He cleaned poultry farm and fed the birds. He had gone to fields and worked there all the day. He had performed his daily duties including bathing, taking food and other house works. At the night, while going to bed, before fell into sleep, he chanted once again, "Namo Narayana."
After watching him keenly, Narada Maharishi returned to God Vishnu. He observed a puzzle on the face of Narada Maharishi. He said, "Narada! Take this vessel filled with milk up to the brim. Handle it with care. Have a round of Vaikuntam [I.e. the world where God Vishnu exist] came back to me. But one condition, there should not be fall of single drop of milk from the vessel in your hands."
Narada Maharishi started. He returned after some time. God Vishnu asked him, "Narada. Within this time period, how many times that you chanted my name." Narada Maharishi said, "Swami! I find no time to chant your name. My concentration is on the milk vessel." God Vishnu said "Now you could noticed how tuff it is to chant God name by paying concentration on family i.e. Samsaram. To lead a family in a society, a normal person has to pay much concentration than that of you paid on the milk vessel. In spite of that much concentration on his daily duties, the poor farmer didn't forget to chant my name twice in a day where as you didn't find time to do so. Hence he is dearest to me."
Without feeling jealousy, pride and ego, Narada Maharishi accepted that truth. He said, "Yes Bhagavan! I under stood it now. Budhi Yoga is much good than Bhakti Yoga. I try to practice it."
That's the entire story.
'Referring ones duties and works with devotion, knowledge and detachment and by leaving the result of works to God' is called as Bhuddi Yoga. I can discuss in detail about this under the caption "APPLICATION OF BHAGAVAD GEETHA IN HUMAN LIFE AND THE COUP ON IT'S APPLICATION."
Here to refer another story is contextual. One day, Suka Yogi, son of Vyasa Maharishi asked him, "Father! I'm not interested on the family life. Please preach me Atma Gnanam."
He said, "My dear son! You go to Brahma Deva ask for Atma Gnanam." Suka yogi had visited Brahma Deva and requested him to preache Atma Gnanam. Brahma Deva said, "Suka! Take this vessel filled with milk up to the brim. Without falling a single drop of milk on to the floor from this vessel, pay a round to Indra Sabha and come to me."
After some time, he returned to Brahma Deva. He didn't allow single drop of milk to fall on the ground. Brahma Deva said "Dear Suka! You are a Yogi. No need to tell you Atma Gnanam. Because already you know it. Indra Sabha is full of wonders, entertainment and attractions. But you didn't loss attention. You paid concentration on your work what deputed to you. Always having balance of mind, i.e. Sthitha Pragnatha is itself 'Atma Gnanam'."
Such that, our epics lead people to follow Budhi Yogam i.e. performing their assigned works with balance of mind. By leaving all these good morals, ethics and knowledge, referring them as, "Trash! Non seneschal epics!," by high lighting the defects if there are any and by giving strategically pseudo analysis to epics, the coup makers and their supporters successfully demolished that knowledge and attitude from public life. By the way, they facilitated themselves to get their corporate robbery, Political robbery, terroristic robbery and Narcotics robbery as popular, official, authorized and easy made.
'In this context, I refer Narada Maharishi's guidance to scholars and rulers. He was great singer and scholar in music. One day, he visited Dharma Raja, when Dharma Raja was ruling Indraprastha; Pandavas built it after burning the Khandava forest. In Indra Prastha puri, great sculpture Maya, constructed an assembly building Maya Sabha and presented it to Dharma Raja. It was very beautiful, wonderful and attractive one.
Dharma Raja received Narada Maharishi with great respect. Narada Maharishi advised him to perform 'Raja Suya Yagam'. In this context, he had given guidance to Dharma Raja regarding the administration of a country as follows.
"Oh! Son of Dharma! Are you following the justiceful way, which your fore fathers had followed? Are you treating all the people equally? Don't leave the moral works. Don't be miser to do moral words. As well as you should not perform moral works with desires. Don't loss Dharma with desires. Our Dharma Sashtra i.e. moral science tells us to perform Dharmic i.e. spiritual works and donations in the mornings, earnings money in the after noon's i.e. day times, enjoying the entertainments, luxuries in the evenings and enjoying sex in nights. A king should practice the six characteristics. These are 1].The power of analyzing the issues.2].The sense of happenings in the past.3].The long vision.4].The sense of morals 5].The logical sense and knowledge of logic science 6].The talented voice of dominating and authoritative voice in conversation.
The king should protect the 14 locations. These are 1].Chariot Army2].Elephant Army 3].Horses Army 4].Soldiers Army 5].Money of Govt. 6].Communications and Administrations of Govt. 7].Accountancy 8].Official 9].Police and Internal managements 10].Important forts11].Country boarders 12].Science and technology 13].Strength of country 14].Nature wealth of the country. The king should know the seven strategies. These are 1] Sama Marga which means Convincing others by counseling. 2]. Dana Marga means Convincing others by giving money and offering other favors. 3].Bheda Marga which means convincing or melloborning others by doing brain wash them or by threatening them4].Danda Marga, which means counseling or meloboning others by punishing them 5]. Creating the strategy to convince people indirectly i.e. Manthra Sakthi 6].The knowledge of drugs and medicine usage 7]. The power of mesmerizing the people i.e. creating an image and ruling style.
Being king, you have to prevent your Prakruthi Janulu from joining and attaching with your enemies. The Prakruthi Janulu means 1]. Law & Justice people 2]. Defense and police people3].Local body rulers4].The devotional program performers i.e. Poojaries5].Medical people such as doctors etc6].Administrative officers.
If your enemy is stronger than you are, make friendship with them. Don't sleep in unsuitable times i.e. daytime or in public meeting etc. Don't be awake late at night. You have to perform all of your duties in time by waking up early in the morning every day. You have to observe keenly whether the spies of your enemies are secretly meeting your ministers, and subordinates or not. You have to observe everybody at any time whatever they are doing and whoever it is your friend, army or neutral. If you have much money, mind will get attractive towards bad addictions. You take care of it. You have to appoint persons who are trustful, honest, capable, moral, and good mannered, fair and faithful hearted, came from respectable family and intelligent as your ministers.
Being king, whenever you face problems you have to discuss with eligible persons and with your ministers. But you should not seek advices from non-eligible persons. Always you have to take care of your treasure to be full of money. You have to take care of agriculture in time. You have to procure and distribute the needful things of agriculture to farmers in time according to the seasons. You should not use the agriculture staff and farmers for some other works. The scholars and the scientist who have long sight to watch and understand the issues should teach the children. If you entertain 1000 fools by giving jobs and positions to them, it is not wise, and more over harmful. It is that much harmful if you lose one scholar who has wisdom and analyzing power.
The wealth of weapons, money and food grains should not decrease in the country. People should not face trouble for pure drinking water. You have to observe the ministers, the poojari who perform worship of God in temples, Defense officers, bodyguard's authorities, building guard's authorities, prison officers and political leaders of your country and of your enemies. You have to notice what about and where about of them time to time.
By observing the personal nature and abilities, you have to divide the people into Uttama i.e. first grade, Madhyama i.e. 2nd grade and Adhama i.e. 3rd grade. You have to appoint them in their suitable positions. You have to use the service of capable and great persons in the great jobs only. You should not use them to serve in un-appropriative project works to them. Use punishments properly i.e. in limits. You should not punish the people who done wrongs extremely as well as you should not leave them freely without punishment. A holy saint and poojari will leave his master, if the master is with dirt and dirty behavior. A woman with moral values leaves a man with lust and immoralities. Similarly, people will leave the king who doesn't perform his duty and keeping his duty on his shoulders of people. In the service to country and in their service whenever people show adventure and capacity, you have to respect them immediately. You have to treat them well with gifts. Depends upon the ability, eligibility and performance, are you giving promotions to the staff in administration? Take care of the soldiers. Take precautions to provide the entire needful things to them. If not, these will be terrible danger to the country. You should take the responsibility of the families of soldiers who lost lives in the protection of country. Otherwise, nobody will get ready to sacrify his or her life for the sake of country. You have to respect the capable, wise and educated scholars. You have to make them happy. You can entertain your bodyguards, their supporters, and matured people in your secret discussions. To complete your works, you can entertain the misers, people who insulted and with humiliations, in satisfied persons of your enemies and you can take their support to complete your works.
Always there will be two dangers to the country. One is natural disasters like floods, cyclones, wild fires, etc.
Another danger is increase of population of fools in a country, becoming of fools as leaders and the increase of selfishness and greediness in people of a country. The great danger than these is 'the becoming of the ruler of a country as a miser and harasser of people'. One more big danger is 'planning and implementing of coup by the relatives and friends of a king against a country'. But all of these dangers will occur only when the king or ruler of a country is in-capacitive person.
Being king, you have to make the worriers of your enemies as favorable to you by offering them wealth. You have to check whether your enemies are doing the same on your subordinates.
The most important issue is, you have to overcome the arishadwargas i.e. Kama, Krodha, Lobha, Moha, Mada, Macharya which means desire, anger, miser, crazy, ego or pride and jealousy. Being king, you should not addict to liquor, gambling and hunting of animals.
The investment should not be more than the half of income. If there are natural disasters, three fourth can be invested and one fourth of income must be saved as precautionary. Always the accountants and auditors should inform you about the income and investments time to time. In to your innovative thinker's group, persons like thieves, adulterers and misers should not enter. The family members and the relatives of the king may harass the common people. You have to protect the people from all such problems.
The pure, clean and tasty food is needful within limits to the good health of our body. Similarly, for the good health of mind, daily discussions with scholars, intellectuals, saints and well-mannered scientists are needful to the king. To the king and his subordinates, the discussions of entertainments such as sex and arts without limits should be prohibited.
Being king, you should not leave culprits and criminals without punishing. If you show minimum pity on them, there will be the extreme increase of criminal psychology in common people. That's why the guilty must be punished appropriately and immediately.
When export and import merchants come to the country, there will be officers who collect many Taxes from them. If such happens, the economy of the country will collapse. But if you are liberal to them, they can avoid the payment of taxes.
You have to invite the people who are doing service to king, country and you have to invite the people to your assembly. You have to treat them with respect. Otherwise, the service attitude will get decrease in the country, similar case to the scholars and wise people. It is your responsibility to protect the people from the troubles of fire, snakes and diseases. There will be handicapped people in the country. Their maintenance is your responsibility only, same case with orphans and monks. I feel it is my responsibility to say all of these morals to you."
These are the morals of a ruler explained by Narada maharishi to Dharma Raja. In fact, these are the morals to everybody. Every person either male or female is the king or queen to his or her own life. The family is their kingdom. Hence, the above are the morals to lead life. If you observe all these morals, you can notice the impracticing of all the above. That is the coup. That is the strategy. More over anti practicing of the above morals is now in our country. The word redtapisam is the synonym of the impractical and antipractical of the above said political ethics and morals.
We can refer number of event as examples to demo this. The neglecting of the families of the expired solders is one of the demos of coup. In 2001, ISI terrorists had attacked on our parliament. Our security officers lost lives, and they defeated the effort of terrorists successfully. The consecutive governments had taken revenge on the families of those security officers as in the part of the coup. That's why only the then N.D.A. Government and the successive U.P.A. Governments are playing strategic neglecting on them. You can refer the News item dt. 14-12-`07 on Enadu under the caption 'మీ సంతాపాలు ఎవరిక్కావాలి?' Which means 'who needs your sympathy' to have clear idea? The corruption is another demo. The liberal strategy towards prisoners, the discussions about the facilities in prisons is another demo. The poor and innocent common people are leading lives in the situations like in hell. But the criminals in prisons are demanding for falsities in jails. The sociologists, the Naxal leaders, other modern revolutionists and now days' so-called humanists, democrasists are supporting their demands. How sorrowful this is? Is there any good change in the psychology of criminals after releasing from prisons? Not at all! More over the political gundas and criminals are enjoying the prison life as if in luxurious hotels. The delayed justice field is another demo. Making justice, to the victims after so long time means making in-justice only. The promotions, the reservation based on birth i.e. cast and religion, without consideration of poverty and eligibility is another demo. Making unworthy people popular by media is a live demo. Providing 'SEZ' [special economical zones] by demolishing the agricultural fields is a giant demo. The present export and import tax package is a good demo to coup.
By demolishing the epics from Indian society, the coup makers and their supporters had successfully driven the people to do not recognize the implementation of coup on their lives. Otherwise, the morals of epics could warn the people to awake, to recognize, to aware the coup on their lives and on our country. This is because; the coup makers had designed the strategy of coup by depending upon our epics only.
I'll tell you one more interesting point here in Mahabharatham. When Narada Maharishi completed his counseling regarding the morals of a king, Dharma Raja asked him "Maharishi. I'm thankful to you for your guidance to me. You had seen the assembly Building constructed by the great sculpture Maya i.e. Maya Sabah. Did you say any building like that anywhere at any time?"
It seemed that Dharma Raja already in the craze of wealth. He didn't pay much care and attention on Narada Maharishi guidance. That's why he didn't take precaution on his warning about the addiction of gambling for which he paid great penalty.
As concern as Kuru, Pandavas I discussed already. When PanduRaja expressed his desire to have children as Praneetha, Kunthi Devi revealed her boon which got by Durvasa Muni. But she didn't reveal about her elder son to him. What is the difference in between the birth of Karna and Pandavas?
In fact, being an unmarried girl, Kunthi Devi wanted to test the power of magic word i.e. boon given by Durvasa Maharishi to her. There was a childish enthusiasm in her desire. As well as she was curious and lustful, to experience the result of her boon. She used the magic word without permission of her elders. Such emotion had destroyed her happiness in future life. Lifelong she felt sorry and experienced the sadness by losing a son like Karna. When she chanted the magic word and welcomed God Surya, he presented her a son with natural ear-rings and armor. She feared about her sin and the blame of world. She left her son by keeping him in a basket in the river. She had given birth to Karna with the boon. She had given birth to Dharma Raja, Bheema and Arjuna with the boon. But in the birth of to Karna, the intuition of her was desire. In the birth of Dharma Raja, Bheema and Arjuna, her intuition was not desire. For the first act, she had no permission of elders to do so. For the second act, she had permission of PanduRaja, her husband. So the second act was accepted by society where as the first one was not accepted. Thus, the intuition of act was more impactive than the action. In fact, in ancient times, sex among men and women was treated as sacred one, equivalent to srushti Yagna that means creative Yagna, because the sex was mented to have children but not to enjoy time.
Such that Karna born and rejected by his mother, Kunthi. Radha and Adhi Radha brought up the boy so that he was called as Radheya. He also learnt archery by Dronacharya. At the time of talent show of Kuru Pandavas, when Krupacharya asked to declare the name of race and family of Karna to check his eligibility to fight with Arjuna, Duryodhana said, "Sir. You told about ethical science. The same science is telling us that we can treat a person as Kshathriya, if he has the characteristics of great worrier and Army chief. On the other hand, I'm making him eligible to fight with Arjuna, by giving Anga Desa to him". Being son of King, Duryodhana used his powers to make Karna as king of Anga Desa. Dhrutharashtra accepted it. So everybody respected his decision. Following this incident, when Bheema commented ridiculously about Karna, Duryodhana said "Bheema sena! The capacity of a Kshatriya is important than all other things. Though a person belongs to lower casts also, if he is capable, we have to treat him as Kshatriya. A friend to king, Kshatriya also can treat as Kshtriya. We can't identify and classify the beginning places of worriers and rivers. Why should this discussion? What about your births? By watching his glory, his natural ear-rings, and arm our, how you are able to degrade Karna. He has glory and capacity. He is eligible to rule not only Anga Desa; he is eligible to rule the entire world."
This is the conversation in the original Mahabharatham. But the coup makers and their supporters like N.T. Rama Rao had shown this context in a complete different way. He had shown in his movies like Dana Veera Sura Karna, as in the assembly of the King, Dhrutharashtra, Duryodhana criticized the births of Dhrutharashtra and Vyasa Maharishi. There was no shy and accomplishment. There were no respects towards elders. Mr. N.T. Rama Rao in his direction, production and in his action, his intuition was to degrade the elder characters of MahaBharathaam, and to motivate the people to think as "What is the greatness of Bharatham, when their births are that much immoral? So there were no ethical values in Bharatham". He exposed Duryodhana as a person having more self-respect. In fact, this character was very jealousies, thinking if his enemies were okay then he was not okay. He used to think, if any one praise his enemies that means on whom he had jealousy i.e. Dharma Raja, then he consider it as insulting him. He was most disobedient to elders and saints. When Mythreya Maharishi was counseling Dhrutharashtra in Aranya Parvam, he expressed his disobedience with his body language by clapping on his own thighs and beating on the floor with foot. That's why Mythreya Maharishi cursed him to have death in the war by having beats on his thighs. Like that the Maharishi supported Bheema Sena's pledge of killing Duryodhana by beating on his thighs in the context when Duryodhana called Droupadi Devi to sit on his thighs to insult her in the assembly. Always he used to emotional black mail the king, his father Dhrutharashtra as he was going to commit suicide, unless the king accept his desire. Whenever he received defeat in war such as in Ghosha Yathra, Dakshina Gograhanam he was tempted to commit suicide, but when Sakuni shown him same way to fulfill his desire i.e. to achieve victory on Pandavas, he used to re get hope on life.
That is the character of Duryodhana in original Mahabharatham. But in movies, especially in N.T.Rama Rao's own directed movies, Duryodhana was shown with positive captions and projections such as Manadhana, which means man having very particularity about self-respect. Though he was talented in using the weapon Gada, he was fond of coup playing only rather than the straight fighting in the war.
Even in war, in Drona Parvam, after the end of Bheeshma, Duryodhana demanded Drona to capture Dharma Raja and to bring him alive. Then Drona said, "My boy Duryodhana! You didn't demand to kill Dharma Raja even in war. Really, Dharma Raja is Ajatha Sathru, [which means a person for whom no enemies are born. Nobody can feel him as enemy and he won't feel any body as his enemy] why are you demanding to bring Dharma Raja alive? Will you give their kingdom to them to stop the war?"
Duryodhana smiled at him and said, "Acharya! If you kill Dharma Raja, Arjuna can kill all of us with that anger. If you kill Arjuna, Krishna can kill all of us with that anger. Instead of that, if you bring Dharma Raja alive we can play dice again, defeat him and we can make him to go to forest and …"
Such was the original nature of Duryodhana! He treated Karna as his dearest friend because Karna was the worrier in archery and could compitete with Arjuna. In Maya Sabha, when he had mistaken the natural lakes and doors as artificial, Saha Deva had laughed. Droupadi Devi didn't. Moreover, she controlled her servant maids to prevent laughing. But jealousies Duryodhana felt limitless anger on her. As revenge, he wanted and tried to insult her by making her nude in the assembly. Was it reasonable? Was it reliable? If she did laugh even, was it appropriate to insult a woman like that? Duryodhana didn't hear the counseling of Gandhari, Vidura and Sri Krishna because they asked him to practice the Dharma. When Sri Krishna came to them as an ambassador of Pandavas, he along with his bad fellow men i.e. Sakuni, Dussasana and Karna, tried to imprison Sri Krishna, the ambassador which was utterly against the rules and law. To such Duryodhana, the cinema people, particularly Mr. N.T. Rama Rao had given peculiar image of positive shade. To achieve this task, Mr. N.T. Rama Rao had invested his talent, charisma and personal image. He had done this favor to the coup makers and Godfathers of cine field. He had done his maximum level best to demolish the values in cinema presentation. In Telugu movies, he introduced the vulgarity in the movies in which he acted as hero at the age of 50+ to 60+. For example Yama Gola, Adavi Ramudu, Driver Ramudu etc etc, in those movies his dances, his action in love scenes with the heroines, it was mass i.e. vulgar in script and the meaning of the script. As a 'trend', the others had followed and increased that 'Mass' vulgarity. I'll explain you some examples and incidents. In Yama Gola & Adavi Ramudu raising a fresh heroine 'Jaya Prada' had acted. Mr. NTR had beaten her on her buttocks' during the dance to the songs. The meaning of the songs also non-sensual and vulgar like,
"ఆరేసుకోబోయి పారేసు
కున్నాను హరి, హరి!
కోకెత్తి కెళ్ళింది కొండగాలి! నాకు ఉడుకెత్తిపోయింది హరి, హరి!"
This means, I lost my sari when I tried to dry it!
The wind had taken off my sari. I feel very hot, Hari! Hari! [God! God!]
Mr. NTR had acted as an aged schoolteacher in a movie 'Badi Panthulu'. In that movie Sri Devi, being a child artist, acted in the role of a grandchild to him. After 8 or 9 years, she acted as a heroine to him in the movie 'Veta Gadu'. By that time, she was at the age of 16 or 17 years and he was 60+. By making un-alternative to public, the coup makers and their supporters could make such movies as hits. Regarding this coup, I explained it under the caption of COUP ON CINEMA FIELD.
In the 100 days success function of Veta Gadu, this old aged hero Mr. NTR said in his speech as, "what I have to say about this heroine? Shall I call her as granddaughter or lover?" such that his level best he destroyed the moral values and artistic values as well as decency in the movies and in the cinema field. Both Mr. NTR and Sri Devi acted in different roles in different movies. In those movies, the relation among them was grandfather granddaughter and lovers. But he stamped it among persons. The coup supporters may argue that it was only a dialogue to attract the attention of audience and to entertain the audience. I'm saying that type of vulgarity and indecency though to entertain the people is itself a coup on Indian culture. The dropping of values, spoiling of the feelings and idealistic views for the sake of business i.e. to make a movie hit, is the over leaf cause of the coup. Being leading person of the field, without having the social responsibility, what he done to drag the decency into the drainage dig is the form of coup. Unavoidably and helplessly to have career in the field, other actors praised him and followed him. His son Mr. Bala Krishna and Chiranjeevi etc continued his heritage of vulgarity. By doing this favor to the coup on movies by destroying the epics and ethical values, by destroying the decency, by introducing the vulgarity and by patronizing the vulgarity, as a return gift he got the political career from coup makers i.e. Mr. Ramoji Rao, C.I.A. and I.S.I.. Regarding this part of the coup, I can explain it under the caption of 'COUP ON INDIAN POLITICS'
To project the Villon of Mahabharatham, Duryodhana as a hero, the coup makers and their supporters in cinema field, like Mr. NTR and others, tried their level best to project Dharma Raja and Arjuna as Hippocratic and deceiving natured fellows.
In the context of Eka Lavya, Drona refused him as a disciple. Eka Lavya practiced Archery by keeping the mud ideal of Drona as his teacher. Kuru Pandavas had gone to forest for hunting. At that time, Eka Lavya shooted seven arrows in the opened mouth of barking dog at a moment. By watching that talent, Arjuna informed it to Drona and asked him, "Archarya! You promised me to make me the top person in archery world. But this Ekalavya is showing much talent than that of me. He is saying that he is the disciple to you. How is this possible?"
Drona went to Ekalavya. When Ekalavya got ready to pay Guru Dakshina, Drona demanded to give his right thumb by cutting it with a knife, to keep his promise to Arjuna alive. By doing this, Drona felt so bad on himself. In this issue, Arjuna didn't influenced Drona to do so. But Mr. NTR had shown that Arjuna had insisted Drona to take right thumb of Ekalavya, so that Ekalavya could not use the art of archery, in his movie 'Dana Veera Sura Karna'.
Regarding Dharma Raja, the coup makers and his supporters like NTR had projected totally in a peculiar way. Strategically they had shown deviated stories about Dharma Raja.
In fact, in original MahaBharatham, Dharma Raja was sweet talkative man. He always talks truth. Because of his only weakness of gambling, he spoilt his life and his family member's lives. But he followed a tradition that, being king nobody should refuse a proposal of war and dice playing game. But here his intuition was gambling so that he paid penalty. Beside this negative quality, he had many positive qualities. Here Vyasa Maharishi projected a human being having both negative and positive qualities as a hero of this epic story. He projected how a man struggled to follow Dharma, ethics and truth, having his negative and positive qualities, in the both happy and sorrowful situations.
In the context of Gandharva Prasnalu i.e. questions of Yakshaw, Dharma Raja had shown his wisdom and his idealistic views. One day Dharma Raja and others, while travelling through forest felt tired and thirsty. They sat under the shade of a tree. They searched for water. They found a lake nearby. Nakula had gone to fetch water. He didn't return. Sahadeva, Arjuna and Bheema followed him, but nobody didn't return. Finally, Dharma Raja went there to find what happened. On the bank of the river, he had seen his brothers fallen on the ground. When he tried to pour water on their faces, a Yakshaw objected him and said "Hai! Man! This lake is mine. If you give answers to my questions, I'll leave you. Without hearing my voice, if you touch the water in the lake, you also reach your brother's position."
Dharma Raja accepted his proposal. He said "Oh! Holy man! Ask me." Yakshaw asked so many questions and Dharma Raja replied to all of them. Through this conversation, we can notice the intellectuality and idealism of Dharma Raja, Vyasa Maharishi established it like that. Among those questions, Yakshaw asked him 'What is the issue that makes you to get surprise?" Dharma Raja said "Oh holy man! Everybody used to see the death of the people and other living beings in their surroundings. Yet they think that they won't die. This makes me to surprise." Yakshaw pleased at him and said, "I'm happy with your answers. I'll give a boon to you. I'll give life to one of your brothers. Select one." Dharma Raja said "Thank you sir. Let Saha deva take the life." Yakshaw said, "If you desire the life to either Bheema or Arjuna, they could win Kouravas and make you as king. By leaving them why you have selected Saha Deva?"
Dharma Raja said "Sir! In my mother Kunti's sons, I'm alive. In my stepmother Madri's sons, nobody is alive. That's why I selected SahaDeva. And Saha Deva is younger to all of us. To protect my younger is my responsibility."
Yakshaw said, "I'm very happy with your idealistic views and morality. You didn't think about coming up war, if it happens in future and the possibilities of its wining. You thought only about morals and bondages. I'm giving all of your brother's lives. I'm Yama Dharma Raja; I'm blessing all of you to complete your Agnatha Vasa without recognition by anybody."
And in Aranya Parva, when a cursed Emperor Nahusha in the form of python caught Bheema. Dharma Raja with his intellectual answers to his questions impressed him and gets release of Bheema. As well, Nahusha got release of curse. Such incidents and discussions are multiple in Maha Bharatham.
By leaving all of these positive qualities, the coup makers and their supporters expose only the episode of Drona's killing, in which Dharma Raja said, 'Aswathama Hatha Kunjara:'
I explain it in detail.
In Kurukshetram, Drona was creating terror in the war. He was killing the worriers in the side of Pandavas. To weak him psychologically, Bheema sena said, "Aswathama Hata:" according to the advice of Sri Krishna. By thinking that his son, Aswathama was killed by somebody, Drona felt worried, but not believed the words of Bheema. He was in doubt. As per advice of Sri Krishna, Dharma Raja reached near to Drona. By that time, an elephant named Aswathama was killed in the war. Dharma Raja said, "Aswathama Hathah" in loud voice and said in the following as "Kunjarah" in low voice. He said that Aswathama named elephant was killed by word. It was not a lie. But his intuition was to weak Drona by creating desperation in him. He created a feeling as if the son of Drona, Aswathama was killed. It was a sin. Because of this, Dharma Raja had visited hell in the Swargarohana Parvam.
In that Swargarohana Parvam, Dharma Raja had shown his versatility by refusing the heaven for the sake of dog, which followed him from earth to heaven and for the sake of his brothers and Droupadi. The coup makers and their supporters didn't refer any one of the positive qualities of Dharma Raja. They highly projected on the issue of Drona's killing.
On the other hand, the coup makers i.e. Mr. Ramoji Rao, C.I.A. and I.S.I. and their supporters like Mr. N.T.Rama Rao, some cine people and others projected Karna with most deviation from original Mahabharatham.
In original Bharatham, Karna, being rejected son of Kunthi, brought up by Raadha and Athi Radha bound to the friendship and respects given by Duryodhana. He was great worrier. Karna had a principle of giving donations to any one, whoever requests him for donation. He used to give whatever the people request him to donate. He always tried to please Duryodhana. When Sri Krishna offered him to join with Pandavas by revealing his birth secret, Sri Krishna said, "Karna, you are not Raadheya, the son of Raadha. She brought up you. You are Kaountheya. Kunthi Devi had given birth to you with the boon of God Surya. You join with Pandavas. You can become the elder to Dharma Raja and the king of this wide kingdom. The most beautiful woman, Droupadi can marry you as sixth husband to her." Karna simply rejected this proposal and said, "Krishna! I know that I'm the son of Kunthi. When I donated my natural ear-rings and armor to Indra, who came to me with a request to give my ear-rings and armor as donation to him, he told my birth secret. But kunthi Devi rejected me when I was a newborn baby. She left me in the river. Since that, Raadha and Athi Radha brought me up. They gave their son's position to me, in their race, in this society. They are my parents. I have the responsibility of them being their son. Now with the desire on Kingdom or on Droupadi or on something else, if I join with Pandavas, what a cheat it is, towards them? Duryodhana respected me by making me as king of Anga Desa. He is treating me as his friend. If I cheat him now, by joining with Pandavas, what people will think about me? If I do so, how unthankful I am towards my parents and to my friend, Duryodhana? If I do so, people will think about me as 'I felt fear to fight with Arjuna, that's why I joined with Pandavas. I don't like to have such notorious name in the society. For any one, death is better to have notorious name among people. Being friend I'm supporting all the sins and immoral of Duryodhana. I know that I'm doing wrongs. But I'm ready to go to hell by doing this. But I don't like to leave Duryodhana. I know that where the ethics, morals and truth are, there will be God and Victory. So that I know that Pandavas are going to win in the coming up battle. Let it be. Please leave me. Let us meet in the battle field."
That is the versatility of Karna. Such that knowingly or unknowingly, whatever we do, good or sin, we have to receive the result of it, either in heaven or in hell. Besides that, we can receive it on the earth.
When Kunthi Devi approached him, before starting of war at Kurukshetra, with the same proposal that of Sri Krishna, Karna replied to her as it was to Sri Krishna. When Kunthi cried, he said, "Mother! I promise you that I won't kill any of Pandavas except Arjuna. Either Arjuna or I will remain alive after the war. Any way you will have five sons as Pandavas."
Such is Karna's character.
But Karna, several times failed in fighting with Arjuna. Being Drona's disciple, when Drona demanded 'the capture and bringing of Drupada' as a Guru Dakshina i.e. as gift to him, he had gone to fight with Drupada along with Duryodhana and other Kouravas. He failed there where as Arjuna was succeeded to bring Drupada to feet of Drona.
In the context of insulting Droupadi Devi, after defeating Dharma Raja in dice play, in the assembly of the king, Karna ill-treated Droupadi to satisfy Duryodhana. He had known that it was not right. This was the result of his perversion. Because he was a rejected son, he had a fire and pain in his mind. That defect provocated him to support the evil. The heirs of Karna, the brothers of Karna are in lakhs in number, in our society now.
If Duryodhana was not procured such capable support from a person like Karna, he could not ready to oppose Pandavas and hence Kurukshetra might not happen. By feeling proud, satisfied and confident, Duryodhana got ready to fight with Pandavas with the confidence on Karna's worrier ship.
Hence, we can say that if Kunthi Devi didn't give birth to Karna, Bharath war would not happen. That means if Kunthi Devi didn't follow immoral way to have a son by God Surya, the war itself wouldn't happen. So that we can understand how much morals are needful in society.
Not only in Drupada's issue, Karna failed several times in war. In Ghosha Yatra, when Pandavas were in forest living, to humiliate them Kouravas had gone to forest as on picnic. There, the Gandharvas had imprisoned them along with Duryodhana and Karna. At last Dharma Raja, Bheema and Arjuna had fought with Gandharvas and convinced them to release Kouravas. In Dakshina Gograhanam also, Karna failed in fight with Arjuna.
By leaving all of these, the coup makers and their supporters, like Mr. N.T.R. had projected that Karna was superior worrier to Arjuna. They projected as, due to the curses of earth Goddess, Parasu Rama and others, Karna was defeated and killed by Arjuna.
In fact, if any person is on the negative side, on the immoral way, then it is natural to him to get curses. Karna is a live example to this, given by Sri Vyasa Maharishi. If a person is on the positive side, on the moral way, then it is natural to him to get the boons. Due to fate or due to others mistake if they get any curse, it will change into boon to the persons who are on positive side, on the moral way. Arjuna is a live example to this.
When Arjuna visited heaven, Urvasi expressed lust on him. He rejected her desire because of his morality. With great in-satisfaction and ego, she cursed him to turn as impotent. But it had turned as a boon to him to spend one year in Agnatha Vasam at Virata king's palace.
And more ever with the episode of Karna, the coup makers and their supporters like Mr. N.T. Rama Rao had created Prakshipthams to degrade the character of Droupadi Devi.
According to their deviated story, they created the following incident, which was not in the original Mahabharatham.
According to that, while Pandavas were walking through the forest, they reached a magic mango tree. Because of their mistake, a mango fruit was dropped from the tree. The tree belongs to a saint. They feared about his curse. They prayed to God Sri Krishna. He appeared before them and said, "All of you say about the hidden things and your secret desires openly one by one. Then only this fallen fruit can attached to its original twig. One by one Nakula, Sahadeva, Arjuna, Bheema and Dharma Raja expressed their desires. According to that installment, the mango fruit was moving up towards the twig. At Droupadi Devi's turn, she said, "I have no desires. I should be always please my husbands; all good must happen to them. Let Dharma Raja become the king." The mango didn't move up to attach its original twig. Sri Krishna smiled at her and encouraged her to tell the truth. She said, "Brother! I have a desire. I want to have Karna as my sixth husband." Surprisingly, the mango attached to the tree. In this scene, the action of Sri Krishna acted by Mr. N.T. Rama Rao as if he was pulling out the hypocrisy of Droupadi Devi. The action of other artists who acted as Pandavas was 'surprise towards Droupadi regarding her hidden desire'. The action of actress, Sarada who acted as Droupadi Devi, with her body language, her voice, and her dialogue expressed as if Droupadi
Devi was lustful on Karna.
What a bad projection on Droupadi Devi? It was the assassination of her character. In Vyasa Bharatham, she born in Yagna Vatika, born to marry Arjuna. As per God Siva's boon to her, as per guidance of Vyasa Maharishi, as per the casual word of Kunthi Devi, she became wife of five Pandavas. She married them, as they were in disguise of poor Brahmins. At that time, they were begging food in the streets. Being princess of Drupada, she had wealth. But she accepted the condition of her Svayamvara. As per that condition, Arjuna in disguise of a poor Brahmin young man, he won the Mathya Yanthra. Without hesitation, she married him. She was that much committed to morals and ethics. Otherwise, why didn't she accept the invitation of Duryodhana and offers of Keechaka, Saindhava when Pandavas were lost their wealth? She was loyal to her husband's. As per their condition, she spent with one person per one year. She never minds to serve her husbands and to serve her duties. She didn't prefer to go to her father Drupada's house, when Pandavas lost their kingdom.
'In Mahabharatham, so many Paradoxes, so many contrasts were exposed and discussed. In Aranya Parvam, one day Sri Krishna visited Pandavas along with Satya Bhama Devi, wife of Sri Krishna. She was one of the eight wives of Sri Krishna. In Ramayanam Sri Rama had only one wife Sita Devi and Sita Devi had only one husband Sri Rama. In Mahabharatham one husband, Sri Krishna had eight wives. And one wife Droupadi Devi had five husbands. While educating the kids in Mathematics, we make them to learn numbers, then additions, Subtractions, multiplications, arithmetic, algebra, calculus and Trigonometry etc etc. Similarly, our elders made us to learn idealism and the art of living with idealism, starting with epics of Ramayanam, Mahabharatham, Ashtadasa puranams, Upanishads and Vedas.
By leaving all of the knowledge and positive qualities in them, if coup makers and their supporters propagate that, in Vedas only enjoying the liquor such as Sura and Soma Panam was there and if people believe it, what we can say, except putting a salute to them?
Back to the story of Mahabharatham, Satyabhama Devi asked Droupadi Devi "Dear sister-in-law! Your husbands are equal to emperors of the world. But always they are pleased with you. They are pleasant to you. Always they are polite and soft to you. They won't hurt you even with a single word. Which devotion we have to perform, which medicine we have to use, which magic word we have to chant, or in which holy river, we have to take bathe to have such pleasant and favorable behavior from husband? Please let me know."
Droupadi Devi smiled at her and said, "Dear sister-in-law. The women who doesn't know to protect her character [which means psychological but not physical character] and nature needs the devotions, medicines, magic words and holy bathes. Without having nice and good behavior, the devotions etc methods about what you said are useless. We should not think about such short cut methods by neglecting our behavior. If any wife is trying to use such devotions and magic's etc to grip her husband, whenever her husband notices it, immediately his heart will fill with impeacefulness. They will consider their wife as a snake in the house. [Actually Satya Bhama performed a devotion to grip Sri Krishna and she donated him to Narada in the part of that devotion. As per its condition, she had to buy him from Narada by giving equivalent weight of money, gold or other things. By investing all of her wealth, she could not weight him in a balance. By depositing a leaf of Tulasi i.e. holy basil, Rukmini the first wife of Sri Krishna could weight him in the balance. In that story of Sri Krishna Thulabharam, our epics tell us that the bondages are more valuable than wealth and bondages can be formed only with behavior, love and affection but not with wealth. Beyond all her devotion, Sri Krishna excused Satyabhama because of their love and affection only.]
Droupadi Devi continued as, "If medicines used by wives, to husbands, they may affect to diseases. They may become mad. They may die. If the husband is in middle age, he may get disability to hear, to talk, or to see. That's why no wife should practice such methods. You asked about my practice to get the love from husband. Listen! I won't allow ego and pride to reach me. I won't talk rudely to anybody. I won't stay in unnecessary places and I won't watch unnecessary things. I won't talk to all, just like a shy less woman. I won't look to anybody if they are unfamiliar to us. I always behave to please my husband's by noticing their desires, their thoughts. With respective to myself this is my Brahma Vidya or Atma Gnanam. [If seems that performing her duty perfectly as a wife, she is saying that is her Atma Vidya] I'm respecting my husband's when they were with wealth in palace and when they are in this forest without wealth. [Now a day, we are watching so many wives giving divorce or leaving husbands when the husbands lost the wealth. Sometimes, when this type of wives finds more rich man than their husband, then also they are leaving the husbands. In such situation, with such attitude, how they can understand the human values, bondage values and idealistic values, either in epics or in history?]. Whenever they go out on any work, when they return to house, immediately I'll attend them by leaving my work in hand. I'll give water and I'll serve them to relax. I take care to notice whose taste is what. I prepare such favorable dishes to everybody in the house and I serve them with smile. I make them to enjoy the food with pleasure. Always I keep my house neat. I won't allow laziness to occupy me. Except in leisure and jovial talk, I won't laugh unnecessary in front of them. I won't wander in gardens lonely. I won't allow nasty people in my surroundings. I don't know in-satisfaction. I won't get anger. At any time, if I get anger, immediately I drive it out. Without the company of my husbands, I won't go to other's house. I hear the speeches of elders, but I won't expose my intelligence in it. If my husbands are out of station, I won't wear ornaments and make up. Without wearing good dress, ornaments I won't stand in front of my husbands. I won't visible to them without brushing my hair.
I behave as my mother-in-law in the house. I follow her way to deal everybody in the house. I won't say single unmannered word towards my mother-in-law. I won't argue with her and with my husbands. I always keep my mind peaceful. I get up early in the morning. I personally look after the needs of everybody.
When we were at Indra Prastham, I looked after the food and needs of eight thousands of scholars, eighty-eight thousands of students and other guests. I had taken the responsibility of my servants and their welfare.
I looked after the income and investments time to time. In our treasury, I know everything. I looked after always to keep our treasure with full of wealth. I get up early in the morning before everybody get up and I go to bed late in the night after everybody slept.
With this behavior only I seeked their affection, Dear Satya Bhama! We can't get happiness in happy moments. When we know the pain of sorrows, then only we can experience the happiness.
Whenever you notice the entrance of your husband into the house, don't order your servants and servant maids to look after his needs. You personally look after his needs. You serve him personally. If your husband tell anything to you, keep it as a secret, doesn't matter whether it is secret or not. When the friends and relatives of your husband came to your house, treat them well. Take care of their food and needs. Don't entertain the enemies or in-favorable persons to your husbands. Don't entertain the women who talk nonsensically and carry rumors to you. Don't entertain the blames on others. Don't spent time lonely with any other persons, whoever they are including your close relatives. Always be with neat dress and limited make up. Always be with pleasant smile. Always be ready to serve your husband. Then your husband Sri Krishna will make you as empress to his kingdom of love."
This was the character of Droupadi Devi. She told evergreen behavioral science, to become an ideal wife and ideal queen of the house. Similarly, in epics 'an ideal husband and an ideal man, how he should behave' also discussed to guide the people in society.
During the residing time in forest, Droupadi Devi had discussed about the advantages and disadvantages of anger as well as those of patience. Totally, she had discussed the limitations of anger and patience. She had referred the conversation of Bali with his grandfather Prahlada.
She said, "There are suitable times to anger and patience. According to the situations, we have to implement them. During the time to practice patience, we have to be cool though we lose luxuries and all the others show neglecting on them. When the emperor Bali asked his grandfather Prahlada as "grand father! Tell me, among the anger and patience, which is the best. So that I'll follow it.," he said, "My boy! Patience is good. But it is not good to follow it always. Similarly, we should not be always with anger. If we are always with patience our enemies, servants and others will neglect us. That's why intellectuals must show anger and patience in limits. If the master is always with patience, subordinates won't show obedience towards him. They will try to enjoy the luxuries and facilities of the master. They won't serve their master, and more over they ill-treat him. They will create dangers to him.
If a person behave with anger althrough the time without proper reason, he will loss all of the friends and loving ones. Everybody will hate him. Nobody will love him. Ever anger person degrades every body and creates enemies. He will loss everything and finally he will lose his life. Ever-angry person talk rudely with all. So that everybody treats him like a poisonous snake. They will take revenge on him whenever they get opportunity to do so. That's why we have to practice anger and patience in limits and according to the situation. First mistake is excusable to anybody. If people perform the same mistake, they must be punished. Before punishing them, we have to enquire into the issue and we have to analyze whether they performed the mistake by knowing or unknowing". That's why you have to punish Kouravas, you should not show patience towards them, because they are doing harm repeatedly to us and wantedly doing the harm to us."
As a response to this, Dharma Raja had explained her how anger is dangerous to people. He said, "Droupadi! To the human beings, anger is the cause to death. A person who over comes it, can achieve developments in all sense. Persons who influences by anger will collapse. An angry person won't hesitate to murder their teacher even. The anger motivates us, to talk rudely, to insult others, to do evil works, to kill good people, to respect bad people, and to provoke us to commit suicide. It will drive us to hell.
That's why people should avoid anger. If others show anger, a good and knowledgeous person will show patience only. By the way, he can create welfare to both of them. The person who ever doesn't show anger on incapable persons, he is the best. Only fools and ignorant can leave patience. If persons are without patience, there will be always wars on this earth. The anger is immoral and not good. It will motivate the people to scold one another and to kill one another. Wife and husbands, parents and children won't hesitate to kill one another. Then how this world can be with peace and happy?
Droupadi! The time is waiting for the end of Bharatha race. Duryodhana has no patience. Moreover, he is not eligible to understand it. But I'm working with patience. I have the eligibility to practice it. Our moral sciences are leading us to practice the patience and generosity. That's why I don't like to go to declare war on Kouravas. Let us wait until our conditions of 12 years living in forest and one year living in disguise are fulfilled".
Such that, our epics leads us to practice the right method in right time, with the help of story. Any issue, concept and theory can be under stand with the help of application. This is scientific and technical fact. The same was there in our epics. The morals, truths that are applicable to our life are discussed on the base of stories.
By making mockery on epics, the coup makers and their supporters successfully driven out the epics from Indian society and successfully transplanted a devil i.e. corporate T.V. in the middle of our houses and lives.
In the Udyoga Parvam while the ambassadors visits among Kuru Pandavas, the depth of political science was discussed. If we understand the deal of four ambassadors, we can understand the world and country politics very easily. Clearly, I confirm you that you can experience it. Here, there are four Ambassadors.
1]. Without talent in deals, common sense and analysis of issues, the first ambassador from Pandavas to Kouravas i.e. Purohit of Drupada had explained and exposed the truth as it was.
2]. Sanjaya was another Ambassador from Dhrutharashtra to Pandavas had dealt the issue as smooth to both sides. He followed a method in which 'the stick should not be break and the snake should not be killed.
3]. Sri Krishna, as an ambassador from Pandavas to Kouravas had behaved in such a way of beating a poisonous snake with a strong stick.
4]. Ulukudu, the son of Sakuni, being an ambassador from Kouravas to Pandavas had spoilt the hearts of both sides as already they were in hatred.
Along with the original story flow, there were so many other episodes to create interest in the readers. The total target of epics is to lead people in knowledgeous and moral way.
In the context of Urvasi, Arjuna's conversation, we can understand the human psychology when they are influenced by desire. To satisfy her desire, Urvasi say many arguments.
In the context of wax house burning, in the context of Hidimbasura, Bakasura and Kirmira Vadha, we can understand the crises management and the impact of self-confidence, by watching Bheema and Pandavas.
By watching Uttara Kumara, we can understand the persons who are talkative but not willingful to work. By watching the crises of Pandavas, we can get motivation to practice morals without fearing about crises.
To nullify this motivation, the coup makers and their supporters had propagated the story of Akshaya Patra and Durvasa's story. In Aranya Vasam, God Surya had given a vessel to Dharma Raja to feed his people. But with that, they didn't enjoy the royal food. They faced several troubles in forest. Twice and more, Droupadi and others fell unconscious due to the tire some. Without referring these troubles, only Akshaya Patra was focused such that it could give whatever the royal food the Pandavas demand. Hence, people could think, "What is the problem in forest if we get tasty royal food time to time.
With that single thought, the common person can't think further. Hence where is the case of motivation etc etc?
In the context of wax house burning and in the Virata Parvam, we can watch the art of spying. By watching Dhrutharashtra, we can watch how a blind love towards the children can spoil their lives as well as how it can destroy the entire race.
By referring Vidura Neethi, and Kuta Neethi we can learn so many things. I refer KANIKA NEETHI to you. This is in the Adi Parvam. After the death of PanduRaja, Pandavas reached Hasthina puri. All the Kouravas, Pandavas and Karna had learnt arts of war by the teaching of Drona. Dhrutharashtra had made Dharma Raja as prince 'would be king' i.e. YuvaRaja. Day by day, Pandavas were getting popularity among public. This made Kouravas and Dhrutharashtra unhappy. Dhrutharashtra called on his minister, Kanika who was expert in the science of coups i.e. Kuta Nethi. In the privacy, the king expressed his impeacefullness. Kanika said "Oh! Maharaja! Before the destroying the enemies we have to destroy their three assets of 1].Their enthusiasm 2].Their wealth 3].Their thinking power. Similarly, we have to nullify their five strengths such as 1].Their Ministers 2].Their forts 3].Their treasuries 4].Their defense army 5].Their provinces. To do such, we have to adopt the following methods 1].Samam which means by counseling and brain washing 2].Danam which means by corruption 3].Bhedam which means by threatening and black mailing 4]. Dandam, which means by punishing 5].By slow poisoning 6].By creating crises. First of all, we have to destroy the force of enemies and then their supporters.
To do this, among our enemies, we have to apply different methods on different sections of the enemies. [The relevant story of this concept i.e. Divide and rule policy, I had written under the CAPTION OF EDUCATION] We have to frighten the coward people. We have to grip misers by giving them money. If they are weak, by force we have to control them. We have to make friendship with the enemy if he is equally strong to us. We have to kill them by using poison or by deceiving them.
When we want to harass the enemies, we should not be anger. By behaving with smiles, we have to bitten them and kill them like a snake. Whatever the coup we planned, we should not let it to reveal. We have to wait for a right moment. Up to that time, we have to behave with smiles, sweet speeches and with patience. No living being can be happy without grievances. Whoever desires peace in mind, they have to satisfy the scholars, and they have to get the blessings of the scholars.
We have to provocate the desires of the enemies, but we should not let them to fulfill. At the same time, we should not let them to know this strategy. Tact fully we have to make postponements to fulfill their desires. It should be like 'the using of a knife to cut the hair, in the right opportunity'. Up to getting the opportunity, we have to hide the knife in leather bag. To do this, whatever may be the strategy we follow, it should not create further troubles to us. These are all you know. You asked me to tell. As my responsibility, I told you. You think about all of this morals science and reach your target."
Like this Kanika explained. He explained about the strategy of moral science. But he didn't prescribe him about the coups, which they had to follow, in that particular situation. As an application of this concept i.e. Kanika Neethi, Kanika had explained a story to the king, Dhrutharashtra.
అనగా అనగా..........
Once upon a time.
There was a big forest.
So many cruel animals were in the forest. There was a fox. It was so clever. It used to make others to do work, whenever the result had to expected, by deceiving others, it used to enjoy the result.
This fox had four friends, Tiger, Wolf, Mongoose and a Rat. It was living happily by pretending that making friendship with them.
Then one day,
The fox had seen a fatty deer. When the deer watched these fox & friends party, it ran far away. The fox desired to eat it. In spite of great effort, it could not capture it.
The fox thought well.
It assembled the friends in a place and said "Look friends! How much the deer was beautiful, that much was the taste of its meat! But we are not capable to run as speed as the deer. That's why we can't kill it. Now we have to kill it by planning coup. Then we can enjoy its meat." Such that it tempted the remaining animals with watering mouth.
All the friends tempted to eat the deer. With eagerity, they said "Friend! Please tell any idea."
It pretended thinking and said.
"Ah! I got an idea! Listen carefully and tell me your opinion. We can't capture the deer when it is active. That's why please find out that when it will be in sound sleep with tiresome. Then without making noise, the rat has to crawl up to it and has to bite its legs. At the same time, the tiger has to jump on to it and has to bite its neck. That's all."
All the friends were happy with the fox's wisdom. They waited until the deer sleep.
The deer ate up to belly full in the forest, drank water in the river, after tired it had taken rest and slept.
As per fox advice, the rat approached the deer silently and bitten its leg. At the moment it tried to get up but the tiger attacked it and killed it.
Joyfully all the animals were ready to eat the deer meat. Then the fox said "Friends! Let us enjoy the delicious meat. But your bodies were with dirt. All of you go to that valley river and have bath and then come! Then we can enjoy this meat."
All the four animals had gone to have bath with excitement, the tiger return from river before all the other animals.
By that time, the fox was weeping. The tiger asked it "Friend! Why are you crying?"
The fox replied with tears in its eyes as "How can I say to you my dear friend. Do you know, what the rat said? What is the use of tiger, though it is big animal? It was not able to do any thing until I bite the deer's legs. The deer was killed by my intelligence. To eat that meat, how shameless the tiger is! By hearing such words, I'm sad!"
Tiger felt self-respect and ferociously said "Friends! The rat helped me to
Think well. From this day I earn my food. I won't depend on others!"
By saying like this, the tiger left the place. Next rat come. The fox said "Do you hear, my dear friend rat! 'The meat of deer got poisonaised because of Tiger's bite. So I will eat rat. By saying like this the mongoose started for you".
Immediately the rat ran in to its hole. After sometime the wolf comes. The fox said "Hear this, Tiger got angry with you. It wants to eat you along with its wife. It is on that trial!" The wolf escaped from there.
Then the mongoose came. The fox said "with the desire to eat this meat you came. But I killed all the three animals and throw away. Come to me! If you are able to defeat me, touch this deer's meat."
The mongoose ran away with fear. Later the fox enjoyed the deer's meat happily.
Oh! King! Like this, with wisdom and cheatfulness, we have to fruitful our works – said Kanika.
This is Kanika Neethi. [Ism]
The fox played divide and rule policy. It raised ferociousness in tiger and frighten the other animals by showing one to other, and finally it threatened the weaker animal like Mongoose whatever, the possible way. It had divided the animals and driven them out. Now you please tell who is ancient, whether general Dupley of British or Kanika of Maha Bharatam?
Vidura Neethi itself is a big chapter in Mahabharatham. It is like a big book. It is full of sociology and human psychology. In his speech to Dhrutharashtra, he defend as "The person who does good and appropriate work without leaving interest on it to do, does work with care and devotion is defined as scholar. Scholar is a person who won't get disturb by praising, who doesn't get anger, who has shy and obedience as ornaments. They won't involve in unnecessary issues. They won't feel sad for the non-available things. They won't feel sad for the lost things. They won't be fear in sorrows. They will complete any work once started. They have thankfulness and gratitude. Their hearts are filled with human values. They can grasp the actual nature of things and persons. They know the danger less strategies and thoughts. Their word won't be wasted. They can grasp any subject. They argue with logic sense. They follow traditions. They know how to respect the others. Their education, common sense and wisdom are in co-ordination.
Let us think about fools and ignorant. Their first character is ego. Though they are uneducated, without common sense and wisdom, they will be with unlimited pride. They don't like to do any work. Their desires are up to the height of sky though their position is with utter poverty. They behave with immorality towards friends. They will create quarrels with strong people. They will make enemies like that. They will come to us though we didn't welcome them. They will give advices to us though we didn't ask them. Always they will search for mistakes in others. They will trust in untrustful persons. Without proper reason, they get anger.
The person who has balance of mind always can be happy and peaceful. A king who neglect his enemies and a scholar who didn't tour on countries are waste fellows. It is waste if we didn't donate money to reliable poor and if we donate money to non-reliable persons. The rich persons should be kind to do donations. The poor persons should be capable to bare sorrow and difficulties. The rich people without kindness, the poor people without the power of patience are waste fellows. Arishadwargams are opened doors to hell on the earth. The fear about enemies is much painful. The quantity of pain is great than the quantity of happiness when a person gets a boon, kingdom and son at a time …..."
These are few and very few of the points discussed by Vidura in Udyoga Parvam of Mahabharatham. I request the readers who have interest to know, to refer the original Mahabharatham. I quoted this from Bharatham by Usha Sree, published by Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam.
I referred 10% of Mahabharatham to explain the coup on epics. It is full of thousands of stories. It has one lakh of slokas. The materialism and idealism are discussed in the epics with their limits. We desire hot when the weather is very cool. But we can't bare extreme hot in summer. We desire coolness when the weather is very hot. But we can't bare extreme cold in winter. We will be happy and comfortable when the hot and cold are in limits. Hot and cold is dialectic i.e. opposite to each other. In our Sanskrit language, it is called as Dwandam. Anger and patience are dialectic i.e. Dwandam. Happiness and sadness, black and white, day and night, speed and slow, hard working and laziness, rich and poor, idealism and Materialism etc are dialectics i.e. Dwandams. We need both. Without experiencing the darkness, nobody can know the value of bright light.
That's why our elders, through our epics, Vedas, religions and culture guided us to know the limits of dialectics i.e. Dwandams.
The coup makers i.e. Mr. Ramoji Rao, C.I.A. and I.S.I. with the help of their supporters in all fields, from political i.e. Governments up to private business companies, to lift the limits in between the dialectics i.e. Dwandams, successfully and strategically they had destroyed and destroying India. May be same position is there with all countries, by some others as coup supporters.
Such that the coup makers and their supporters had brainwashed Indian women as the epics are driving them to undergo exploitation by men. They had shown the fabricated stories of Pseudo traditions and pseudo chaste wives like Sathi Sumathi as example of it. Actually some egoistic Brahmins and other leading sections of the people who were like the fore fathers of these coup maker i.e. Mr. Ramoji Rao had created such literature and situations. That's why in the middle ages, in India, exploitation of women and weak people was there, such as prohibiting them to learn Vedas etc. But there were no restrictions to learn the knowledge from epics. Actually, the concept of all the Vedas, Vedangas, and Upanishads is the only concept, which is explained in Bhagavad Geetha. To explain such concept, our elders like Valmiki, Vyasa and other Maharishis had given us the stories of epics.
All the human values and the art of living had explained like that. We make our children to learn words. Slowly we make them to learn sentences and then to read books. Similarly, our elders efforted to make us to learn the Buddi Yoga i.e. working without expecting its result with balance of mind with the epics.
Sri Rama showed us how to be with balance of mind in sorrows. Sri Krishna had shown us how to be with balance of mind in happiness. Actually the later is tough task while compare the former.
Sri Krishna satisfied every body's desires who ever urged him including Kunchela, Gopikas, Radha, Pandavas, Kunthi, Droupadi etc etc but he did not desire anything. He made the people to realize them whenever they feel proud and ego including SatyaBhama. But he didn't feel ego. He practiced his life like the comparison of a water drop on lotus leaf. He preached it in Bhagavad Geetha. When epics were alive in Indian society, people lived happily irrespective of comfortability.
I'll explain one example to you, when Pandavas were living in the forest for 12 years as per the condition of gambling, they faced so many difficulties. During that time, Duryodhana and other had lived in the palace. But they were with impeacefulness, fear and insecurity. Always they were collecting the information about the happiness and achievements of Pandavas, like Kermira's killing by Bheema, getting Pasupatham by Arjuna etc. Always Duryodhana suffered with fear. Then what was the happiness with him though he was in palace? With fear in mind, we can't enjoy food and bed. Same case with him. Like that, happiness is irrespective of the comfortability. The wealth can give us comfortable house; car etc. but it cannot give us the happiness. We can't get happiness from outside. It should be created in our mind, in our thoughts. Only the idealistic views, feelings can make us happy.
If we share our wealth and material to others, it will get decrease. If we share our knowledge, feelings, idealism to others, it will get increase.
Then think which way is better to follow. Idealism means not to leave wealth. Idealism means considering the limits of dialectics i.e. Dwandams. Idealism means leading life with balance of mind and balance of Dwandams.
The coup makers and their supporters first targeted to demolish idealism by projection the materialism is the best way to enjoy life. After the demolishing of idealism, they targeted to demolish the materialism to promote CORPORATISM.
We cannot know we cannot understand what the hunger is unless we experience it. By referring so many books, by discussing with many people, by debating with scholars and by thinking about it for days and years, we cannot experience it, unless we do fasting. More over if we fast, the hunger is not much painful to us because we know that we can have food whenever we want. Because food is available to us. But if we fast, when we have no food, no money to buy food, we can understand what the hunger is in real.
I give another example. If you explain in detail about the taste and smell of ghee to a person who didn't see it, he can't recognize what the taste and smell of ghee, unless he experience its taste and smell.
That's why it is better to anybody to refer the epics, to consider the morals discussed and shown by practice there, and to apply them in the life. Then only we can understand the impact of morals, truth and good behavior. Without practicing, without experiencing, only by discussing about the morals and truth, nobody can recognize it, like hunger and taste of ghee.
I refer you a joke from recent Telugu cinema 'Manmadhudu'. In that movie heroine brought the coffee to hero. He rejected it by saying,
Hero: No, I don't like coffee.
Heroine: Unless you drink the coffee, you don't know whether you like it or not.
In ancient Sanskrit literature of Indians, four Vedas and Vedangas, i.e. Upanishads are the treasuries of the then history, the life style of people, and attitude of people and believes of people. Indians believe that the Vedas were not written by human beings they were emitted from the four faces of God Brahma. They were heard by saints from God Brahma and they were propagated and preserved by Saints. In the mantras of Vedas i.e. Ruckus's, people expressed their desires and attitude. The stories in the Vedas and Upanishads are the sources of concepts and theories of knowledge. Keeping the critic on Vedas as 'అన్ని వేదాలలోనే ఉన్నాయి' which means, 'all is in the Vedas' and the fact that 'so many modern scientists of different countries like Germany and America had learnt Sanskrit in past and are learning Sanskrit in present time', in mind, I started the above.
Following the Vedas, Valmiki Maharishi, with the blessings of seven Maharishis had presented Indians the first poetic book of Sri Ramayanam. Next famed as fifth Veda, Maha Bharatham was gifted to Indians by Vyasa Maharishi. In Ramayanam and Mahabharatham so many morals, ethics, truths are discussed. Especially in Mahabharatham, so many paradoxes were discussed and focused. Vyasa Maharishi focused so many critical issues regarding Dharma, ethics and morals.
I tell you an interesting issue about the coup on epics. After completing Mahabharatham, including Kurushettram, Swargarohanam, and Vyasa Maharishi felt impeacefulness in his mind. He was not happy and not satisfied. Then one day Narada Maharishi came to him. Vyasa Maharishi said, "Narada Maharishi, I completed Mahabharatham. I compiled all the issues, which can guide people in good path. But I have no peace in my mind. Something is burning in my heart. Please advise me what I have to do."
Narada Maharishi said, "Vyasa Maharishi! It is natural. Because of Kurukshethra, the wars in which punishments were implemented on bad and eligible persons up to their eligibility, you feel such. God Vishnu knows this. That's why he sent me to you. The people who are intellectuals, scholars, interested can receive the concept in Mahabharatham. But all the people have no such intellectuality. All the people have no such analytical skills. Most of the people are innocent and ignorant. They can't absorb complex concepts and Paradoxes. For their sake, write Sri Bhagavatham."
By that, he wrote Sri Bhagavatham. It is a compile of sweet stories of God Vishnu including his Avatharas. It is a compile of divine stories and devotees stories. It is a compile of stories without the discussions of philosophy, paradoxes, moral complexities and doubts on ethics such as Droupadi's questions in the context of gambling game of dice in the Kourava assembly as "Whether Dharma Raja lost me as a stake in the game, after losing himself or before losing himself? Am I defeated person with ethics or without ethics?"
The coup makers i.e. Mr. Ramoji Rao, C.I.A. and I.S.I. and their supporters raised so many critics about the logic sense, reality in those stories of Sri Bhagavatham in 1960 to 1992. In movies of old and modern, there are so many illogic and impractical things such as hero can jump from floor to the top of two started building. Hero can fight with empty hand with hundreds of Villon holding weapons and can defeat them. Hero can run with high speed than the speed of car, train etc. Hero can do any adventure. Nobody had criticized it. Nobody is criticizing it and no media is projecting such critics. More over they are supporting it as propagating the arguments and explanations of cinema directors, stunt masters, producers and actors, as "We should not question it. We should not criticize the illogic in the cinemas. It is just for the sake of entertainment."
Then why didn't the coup makers and their supporters could take the same grounds in the case of epics and epic stories? The coup supporters had argued as, "The epics are binding the people to blind believes. Women are putting in the prison of kitchen by them. There lives are putting in the dark by brain washing them with chaste wives stories. The epics are influencing the women and weak people to allow the exploitation on them. That's why we are criticizing them". You can refer the then Newspapers, weeklies, debates, literature meetings, Hethu Vada Sangam arguments and other media coverage's of this.
If these arguments were genuine, why did the media had published such critics only, by leaving 100% the supports on epics, the answers to the critics on epics by the then scholars and the other people who admire the epics?
On the other hand, if epics had done that much evil to society, how the Indian society had in existence since 5000 years. And more over, what about the evil making by movies on the society now? How much the movies are binding the youth, children and people to meaningless crazy things? Youth are putting in the prison of liquor addiction and discotheques. Their lives are making target less. Children are thinking that the world is like T.V. serials and like movies. They believe the cinema heroes are real heroes and taking them as role models. People believe the cinema people as they had the qualities of roles played in their movies. We heard that the Ad of Voda phone regarding the puppy had promoted the sales. We heard that the company had stopped the telecasted of Ad of orbit to enable to meet the demand. We heard that the children are imitating the cinemas and T.V. serials.
Then why don't the so-called intellectuals, modern Hethu Vada Samgham members, the hairs of revolutionary writers like Ranga Nayaakamma etc etc. coup supporters' critic on movies and why don't the media project on this issue coverage?
Now I'll explain the coup on Sri Bhagavatham in detail. I give you an example. Imagine a house, while preparing lunch or dinner for the family, the mother will consider the tastes of all of the members of the family. She will take care about everybody, because she loves everybody and she desires the healthy growth of everybody. She will try to prepare the favorite dishes to everybody. While serving food also, she will consider the appetite of everybody and according to that only, she will serve food to them. Before demanding by the children, she will serve them because she knows that who need what, who needs how much, and who desires what.
Similarly, our fore fathers like Valmiki Maharishi, Vyasa Maharishi and other saints had given different epics, puranas, and other stories. To highlight this, our elders say the idiom that పుర్రెకో బుద్ది జిహ్వకో రుచి which means, "Everyone likes his own attitude, and every tongue likes its own taste."
That's why only, our elders, Gods and elders like Gods had given us Vedas, Upanishads, epics and Puranas. The persons can follow whatever they like. People who can't analyze what is good, what is wrong, what is holy and what is evil, Bhagavatham can guide them in righteous way. People can follow any Yoga to get freedom of soul i.e. mukthi. So many Yogas are discussed in Bhagavad Geetha and epics, including Karma Yoga, i.e. working, Gnana Yoga i.e. research on knowledgeous things, Bhudhi Yoga, Tapassu i.e. penance, Kundalini etc. For the common, innocent people, Bhakti Yoga i.e. Devotion had shown in Bhagavatham. To hear the stories of God, to sing his devotional songs, to chant the name of God, to perform devotional programs, to love God, to keep mind always on God are the features of Bhakti Yoga.
To keep the people in limits of good, the believes on heaven, hell, holy things and sin are in live in the society. Elders, teachers, scholars had encouraged them and propagated them. While making the kids to learn the education we will give small gifts such as chocolates, sweets etc to them, whenever they learn a new letter in alphabets. With such encouragement, they will learn alphabets, words, sentences and concepts. As their learning increases, their knowledge will increase, their analytical thinking will increase, their discretion will increase, and their wisdom will increase. Like this, as their personality develops, they will learn new concepts without demanding chocolates and sweets. As they grow, they can understand the use of education. The believes of heaven, hell, holy things, sin and Mukti i.e. Moksham etc are like the gifts of chocolates and sweets to a kid. After tasting the good concepts, truth, devotions, people can understand them. That's why, in Indian temples and other praying places like Durgas etc, there is a practice of 'Prasada viniyogam' i.e. distribution of delicious dishes.
It will attract the children and innocent people towards the devotion i.e. good practice in life. If coup makers and their supporters comment on it as "It is a corruption offered people to come to temples." Or "What is there in the concept of Prasada Viniyogam except the satisfaction of our desires of tastes? Whatever we like to eat, we are preparing them on the name of God and enjoying them. That's all!" what we can say except observing their strategy. By propagating such comments in Indian society, they had degraded the religion, the respect on the religion, so that they had eliminated self respect in people. People who enjoy the critics on their religion can neglect it, they can degrade it and slowly they can co-operate to implement the coup on it. Same case with country. That's why only, now we are watching so many people who co-operated to make coup on India, our mother country in the issue of duplicate passports, duplicate currency notes, duplicate stamp papers etc and helping the terrorists to blast bombs in our cities. Religion, country and mother are equal. This is the idealistic view. How can the people who are running after money understand this? To reach this situation, the coup makers and their supporters had started in 1960 to 1992 with critics on epics and on believes.
There were so many blind and cruel practices of inhumanity such as preventing women and others from the learning of Vedas, un-touchable, dowry systems and considering castes with respective of births by leaving the consideration of castes with respective of personal qualities, since hundreds of years in India. Those evil traditions supporters were the egoistic people and were like the present coup makers i.e. Mr. Ramoji Rao and his supporters. Psychologically they might be the fore fathers of these coup makers and their supporters.
Let us come back to the stories of epics. In Ramayanam, Mahabharatham the main story was discussed with other sub stories and discussions of morals, ethics among the characters of the story. In Sri Bhagavatham, Suka Yogi narrated sweet stories to Parikshith king when he was waiting to meet death as per the curse of Srungi. Being on the deathbed, the king himself had heard the stories. All the saints, kings and other great people had heard stories and shown such practice to people. But now the so-called modern people are saying they are cock and bull stories or illogic stories as 'పుక్కిటిపురాణాలు'. Hats off to the so-called modern intellectuals who are saying like this.
In fact, any critical or complex subject can be explained in easy grasping way if it is knitted in a story. Story is very impactive on human brain. That's why only any movie with high staring value, by great and talented director, and with high technical qualities also but having no good story could not get succeeded where as any movie without all such features but having good story can get success. Are we not watching such incidents with respective Pokiri, Sainikudu, Anand, and Godavari etc recent Telugu Movies?
Because the epic stories and believes had made to vanish from society, now people had reached to such a situation that, "No need to learn by watching anybody". This comment was delivered by politicians such junior MLA's towards senior MLA's and among opposition political party people, frequently in recent budget meetings [Feb. 2008] in A.P. assembly. Same situation with students vs. teachers, youth vs. elders, children Vs parents etc. There is no need to anybody to learn anything from anybody or from any issue. What a great development in human society!
Indians believe that sin will hunt us after death. Only our good will protect us. If we do bad things our children will get that effect as well our fore fathers will experience sorrow in upper world to which they reached after death. Similarly, if we do good things our children will get that good as well our fore fathers will happy in upper worlds. These 'believes' kept them under control beyond the limits and capacities of law and administration of Governments.
To demolishing this system of control, the coup makers had introduced a new theory of humanity as, "If their parents had done crime, what these innocent children done? It is inhumanity to deal the children and to punish the children because of their parent's sins." This arguments seems to be very moderate and with humanity. But this had given much support to the criminals. It had encouraged people to commit crimes. Whatever they do, their children will be out of danger. Because of their crime, if others children get suffer, it doesn't matter. By the way, is this argument helpful to the children or harmful to the children? In fact, it is support and help to the children of criminals and bad people only. Utterly it is harmful to the children of victims of criminals.
Actually, according to the ancient believes of Indians such as 'if we do harm to others, if we do crimes, if we do badly, it will effect to our children', all the children could be saved. Because, with the background of such believes, people who get criminal idea used to recall this belief, so that they could overcome to commit crime. With the support of new arguments of so-called humanity, criminals do not have such need now.
If fact, if the criminals have no concern about the others, how they and their children are eligible to draw kind and excuse from others and from law and acts? Parents should have concern about their own children, before committing the crimes such as 'what about my children if I go to prison by doing this crime?'
Instead of this, criminals are thinking that they can escape from the punishment because of the failure of Govt.rules and acts in implementation. Unfortunately, if they caught up and then they are thinking that their children are not in danger. Like that, the coup makers and their supporters are indirectly increasing the criminal psychology in people. With epic stories, with historical events, people should remember the truth of punishments. That's why also; the coup makers and their supporters had demolished them from public life. Generally, we used to take all of these arguments in an easy way. We won't think about them. We are treating them as casual. It is our unawaritiveness about the coup, which is destroying our life since decades. But if you watch the happenings, arguments of leading people and media, you can observe that, towards the criminals only, humanity is putting in application. Take example of encounters. Whenever the police encountered terrorists or Naxals, the media, the human rights organization shout on the incidents and criticize the police. Whenever the terrorists or Naxals kill the police, nobody say anything. There is same case whenever the terrorists or Naxals kill the innocent people. Are the Naxals or terrorist's only human beings? Are the innocent people, common people not the human beings? That means only criminals are human beings, but not the common people. So many human rights and facilities are demanding in the case of prisoners in jail. But no concern about the poor people who are living in the tents, and huts beside the roads, railway tracks and in drainage? Are they use less than the criminals? When the criminals are eligible to have such facilities, then what is the sin of poor? What is the meaning of punishment? Where is the address of change in criminals in Jail when they are demanding for facilities instead of feeling guilty about their sin?
'To give such support to criminals, to neglect the poor in such a way' is it not a coup? In fact, our epics clearly tell us about the punishments. In Bhagavatham, 28 types of hells are discussed and which type of punishment is waiting for people who committed deferent crimes. The epics clearly guide the rulers and people in taking care to punish the culprits. They make both the rulers and people to alert about each other's. By referring the epics people can think about themselves and about the rulers. Similarly, the rulers can think about themselves and about the people. Naturally, they can indentify whether they are doing wrong or right. This identification is applicable to everybody with respective of others.
By degrading epics and by demolishing the epics from public life, successfully the coup makers had destroyed this entire natural network, which is existed in India since thousands of years.
I try at my level best to explain the coup on Indian epics on the base of Sri Bhagavatham.
In the beginning of Sri Bhagavatham, when the king Parikshith asked Suka Yogi to guide him to reach Mukti, Suka Yogi, the son of Vyasa Maharishi told so many secrets of the creation, continuation and ending of this world and secrets of philosophical truths. He discussed about different ways to reach Mukthi. He explained about the different ways of leaving this body by saints. If it seems to be suicide to ignorant, we can't say anything except remembering the cine joke of 'Manmadhudu'. Because the saints want to leave the body after achieving the goal of life such as knowing the truth. They didn't want take any tool such as knife, rope, poison or pistol to kill themselves. As in the practice, they used to leave the body in Yoga, where as now-a-days weak-minded people, in-capacitive people are committing suicide because of their desperation, but not with satisfaction. That too they desire another best life following this suicide. Then how the both can be comparable? If anybody compares it, is it not ignorance? Then why don't we recall the coffee joke of Telugu movie 'Manmadhudu'.
I give another good example, which can be examined in our daily life.
Suka Yogi told this to Parikshith. In ancient days, there was a king by name Khatwangudu. He helped the deities during the war with demons. They felt happy and asked him to desire a boon. He asked them, "Still, how much life time I have?" They said, "Two more hours"
He had gone to his capital and donated all of his wealth to poor and eligible. He had given his kingdom to son. He detached all of his bondages with wife and children. He sat in meditation. He concentrated his mind and soul on God, by the moment of his death he reached God. He didn't reach heaven so that he didn't get another life after residing in heaven. He mingled in God. That is the Mukthi.
Another story in Sri Bhagavatham …
అనగా అనగా …………..
In ancient India, there was a city Kanyakubjam.
There was a Brahmin by name Ajamiludu. He was rich enough. When he was young, he was addicted to gambling and prostitution. He attached to a prostitute. He treated her as if his wife and got ten sons.
For her sake, he had done so many immoral activities. He left all of his good traditions of his race. Days passed. He was old enough. The death is approaching him. Among his sons, he was fond of last son, whose name was Narayana. Ajamiludu had died by chanting Narayana Narayana, the name of his loving son. The Yama doothas i.e. Angels of God Yama came and caught his life. At the same time Vishnu doothas, i.e. Angels of God Vishnu came there, to save his life. Yama doothas said, "This man had done so many sins. He belonged to good race. He learnt well, he was kind in heart. But when he was young, his father asked him to bring flowers, fruits for devotion to God. He went to a garden. There he had seen a prostitute and her sex with some man. He lost sense of good and bad. He left all his traditions and good habits. Since that day, he lived with the prostitute, and done so many sins. Let us take the soul of the man. He deserves to go to hell."
The Vishnu doothas said, "You are saying the truth. But white losing life, he said, "Narayana". That's why we come to save him. Leave him and go."
The Yama doothas left there by leaving the life of Ajamiludu. He woke up. He recognized himself. He left all his belongings and bondages. He sacrificed everything and sat in temple. He left his body and life by Yoga. He reached Mukthi.
That's the entire story.
By referring this type of stories, the coup makers and their supporters like the then writers of the time 1960 to 1992 and Hethu Vada Sangham etc. argued as "when people do sins throughout their life, if they say 'Narayana' at the time of death, is it sufficient to go to heaven or to get Mukthi? Because of these stories only, people are thinking that, it is okay if they give donations to temples, whatever the sins they do. Then what is the difference between this and the Papa Parihara Pannu i.e. sin releasing tax which was in practice in Middle Europe before 1450 A.D. by the then Pope and his supporters."
In fact, these stories like Khatwangudu, Ajamiludu are not comparable with sin releasing taxes of Europe, for which there were agents to promote the sales of its coupons. Following Ajamiludu stories, there was a follow up discussion of practicing of good traditions and meditations. Because Ajamiludu had experience of good activities before he got addiction of prostitution, he could recognize himself when the Yama doothas relieved his life. Our elders used to tell us to chant God's name forever, just like breathing throughout your daily life. One should practice to chant God's name all through his life, whatever he does, wherever he stays. Then only he can say God's name at the time of death. Otherwise, it is not possible.
I refer you Dikshitar Kruthi whose meaning is "అప్పటి కోసం ఇప్పుడే చెబుతున్నాను"
This means, he prayed to God, "Dear God! I may for get to say your name at the time of death because of the pain of death. That's why I'm saying your name always in prior."
We know that without practice, we can't perform any work with perfection. A soldier with perfect practice can fight in war successfully. An artist with perfect practice can show his talent successful in any stage-show. A sports man with perfect practice can win the match. Such that the practice of chanting of God's name.
If we observe ourselves whenever we feel pain and shock, we say 'Amma' means 'mother!' By the moment, we fell on ground we say Amma. At the moment we miss to meet an accident, we say Amma. At the moment we sneeze, we say Amma. If we try to practice to say Sri Rama or God's name, we can't say it immediately. How many times we remember to say God at those moments, but we say Amma only. It is difficult to say God at the moment of fear, surprise or shock etc emotions. It is not such an easy thing. Here we have to recall the issue of hunger or ghee or coffee joke of Telugu movie 'Manmadhudu'. With practical experiments and experience, I'm saying this to you.
Indians know the toughness of this fact. That's why only people could believe 100% that Bapuji had said, "Hai! Ram" at the moment of falling down due to the bullets of Nadhuram Godse, irrespective of the ruptures and discussions made on it, by the coup makers and their supporters as in the part of their strategy.
To illustrate this fact, I narrate you a jovial story. It was famous in our society as an idiom,
నార అనమంటే పీచు అన్నాడట
which means when it was said to say Nara to a man, he said peechu. In Telugu, jute is called as Nara and Peechu.
అనగా అనగా ……………
Once in a village, there was a man. He was miser. Always he used to think about money and wealth. Always he was with arishadwargas i.e. emotions such as desire, anger, miser, crazy, ego i.e. pride and jealousy. He never thinks about God, devotion and to do good to others. He lived like this and reached old age. Death time was approach to him. His wife and relatives were crying for him. They were pity to him. They thought, as "This man never goes to temple. He never prays to God. Definitely, he will go to hell. Let us make him to say Narayana. By saying God's name at the time of death, he can go to heaven after death." They tried to make him to say 'Narayana Narayana.' But the miser man was not able to understand what his relatives were saying to him. The relatives tried and tried but in vain. One of the relatives said, "Let us show jute to him. Then let us ask him to say its name. He will say Nara. Then we can make him to say Yana. Totally he can say Narayana." All accepted to this. In Telugu Jute is called as Nara. They brought jute and asked him "what is this?" He said, "Peechu" and died. Peechu is the synonym to jute.
Such that if one person didn't practice in life to do good, to think good and to devote to God, it is impossible for him to do good, to think good, to devote to God and to chant God at the ending of life.
That's the entire story.
The same concept was explained by the famous story of Jada Bharathudu in Sri Bhagavatham. After the ruling his country for many years with morals and truth, he had gone to forest to penance. He become as saint. One day, he went to bath in river. At that time, a deer came to drink water. It was pregnant. A lion roared there. With fear, the deer jumped. At the moment it had given birth to a baby deer. But the mother deer died. The baby deer had fallen in water. Bharatha had seen all of this. He felt pity on deer calf. He had taken it in to hands and brought it to his ashram. He brought it up with care and love. When he was dieing, he thought about the deer only.
As a result, he took a life of deer in next birth. In next turn, he got Mukthi i.e. Moksham. In this story, so much of philosophical knowledge was discussed.
With all this spirituality, knowledge and philosophy, our epics are like floating rivers. If we take water with a tumbler, from it, or if we take a pot of water or if we use water of that river for our life long, it makes no difference to that river. By using the water of river, benefit is ours, but not to the river. Similarly if we do not use the water of river, loss is ours but not to the river.
In Sri Bhagavatham, the background story of demons such as Hiranyaksha, HiranyaKasypa, Raavana, Kumbha Karna, Sisupala Dhantha Vaktra, Kamsa Chanura etc was narrated. One day, Sanaka Sunanda etc four saints came to see God Vishnu. The gatekeepers Jaya and Vijaya didn't allow them inside and more over they didn't respect them, with ego and pride as they are, Dwara Palakas i.e. gate keepers of God Vishnu. The saints cursed them to lose the eligibility to live in Vaikuntham. When they felt repentance, the saints excused them. Then God Vishnu said, "You should not make fun with saints. You should respect them. The saint's curse is truth. You can't escape from it. You can have seven lives as devotes to me. Otherwise, you can have three lives as enemies to me. Select any one as your choice. After that you can reach Vaikuntham."
They selected second choice, as it was better to them to be away from God Vishnu for three lives though as enemies than seven lives though as devotees to God Vishnu. In Indian epics, in Bhagavatham there is the story of gatekeepers of Vaikuntam, Jaya and Vijaya. Due to the curse of Sanaka Sanandana Maharishis, they had taken the demons births as Hiranyakshaw - Hiranya Kashyapa, Raavana - Kumba Karna and Shisu pala - Danta Vakra.
By referring these stories, Vyasa Maharishi led the people to think about bad or sin people, as "We don't know about these people. May they are devotees to God in previous births. May they are cursed divine people or Saints. Due to the curses, they may be like this sin or atheist people. We should not hate them, or ill-treat them. They will carry sin with themselves. Why should we hate them or scold them? Any way kings or rulers are there to punish them if they do badly. Why should we hate them? It will be sin on our part."
The same thinking attitude is provoked by Geetha slokam.
Sri Bhagavad Geetha clearly tells us that we have to treat the rich and poor people with equality. They should not hesitate and hatred mutually. The rich people should not hate the poor. As well as the good people or people who do sacred and holy works should not hate bad people or ignorant people who do sins. The principled and disciplined people should not hate the in-disciplined people. In 5th chapter of Sri Bhagavad Geetha, i.e. in Karma Sanyasa Yogam, Sri Krishna clearly tells us this. A person who can consider an educated and obedient Brahmin, a least caste man, a cow, a dog, an elephant and a man who is eating dog with equality, then such person can be called as scholar [Ref. 5-18].
In that period of demons Raavana, Kumbhakarna, Hiranyakshaw, Hiranya Kasapa etc people who were eligible to born on the earth after the completion of their residing periods at heaven or hell might born on this earth. This system continuously applicable in all times i.e. in all Yugas. Whatever the good or sin we do, we have to born on the earth after residing for the appropriate time in heaven or hell. This is known as Janana Marana chakra which means cycle of birth and death. That's why people have to effort to escape from this cycle of birth and death and to achieve Mukthi i.e. Moksham i.e. mingle in God. That's why human beings have to leave all the desires and arishadwargas. But finally, human beings have to leave the desire on Moksham also. I can give detail description of this concept under the caption 'APPLICATION OF BHAGAVAD GEETHA AND COUP ON ITS APPLICATION.'
Such that it was clear that, because of ego and arishadwargas, anybody can get punishments and births. Prahalada, Bali etc. so many stories can guide innocent people in an easy and pleasant way of devotion.
The stories can clarify the doubts of people regarding paradoxes. I'll give detailed description of paradoxes under the caption,'COUP ON INDIA BY CREATING PARADOXES' . As well, the epics can give clear description of critical concepts with natural comparisons, demonstrations, conversations and stories.
As concern as Sri Bhagavatham the rumors spread on Sri Krishna is another big chapter in the coup on epics. The coup makers i.e. Mr. Ramoji Rao, C.I.A.,I.S.I. and their supporters had targeted on Sri Rama and Sri Krishna, because Indians worship them and try to follow what they said and what they practiced.
As per the bad propaganda of coup makers, they said, "Sri Krishna had made sex with Gopikas i.e. milk maids irrespective of relations, age difference and morals. He enjoyed childhood at Vrepalle with Yashoda and Nanda as his parents. When he left them to Madura, there he became fame as son of Devaki and Vasudeva. Because of that rich and royal life, he didn't memorise about Yashoda Nanda, relatives and friends at Vrapalle.
Sri Krishna made sex with Radha who was an aunt to him. More over ancient poets, Dramatists and singers praised them as symbol of love. What is the difference in between the love of Radha Krishna and the love in extra marital affairs of now-a-days." This is the part of their arguments and propaganda on God Sri Krishna.
When the scholars on epics like Usha Sree, Viswanadha etc tried to expose the truth, the media didn't give space to them to present their arguments. Like that strategically and successfully, the coup makers had degraded epics and totally Hinduism.
Actually, the milkmaids, milkmen, children, cows and their calves were mesmerized by the beautiful appearance and music of Sri Krishna. When he tunes his flute, every living being in Vrepalle got extreme joy. The naughtiness and mischievousness of Sri Krishna as a kid motivated everybody to enjoy their childhood and other's childhood. By enjoying those stories of Sri Krishna's childhood, the elders can enjoy the childhood of their babies and that of children in their surroundings.
In the case of Gopika, women i.e. milk maids, he satisfied their physical desire.
Here I'll tell you a story.
One day the Gopika women i.e. milk maids wanted to cross the river Yamuna to give food to a saint. Sri Krishna told them to pray the river Goddess as "Oh! Goddess Yamuna, if Sri Krishna has no touch with women, if he never enjoys the sex, you please give us way." When they prayed like that, to their surprise the river had divided into two parts and gave them way to cross the river. They reached the other bank and the river was floating as normal. They had devoted the saint there and fed him with butter, curd, milk and cheese. They wanted to return. The saint told them to pray the rivergoddess as "Oh! Goddess Yamuna, if this saint was on fasting, if he didn't have any food, you please give us way." When they prayed like that, the river gave way to them.
This is the story.
When Suka Yogi told this story to king Parikshith, he asked "Oh! Suka Yogi, is it not lie that Sri Krishna didn't touch women and enjoyed sex? Is it not lie that the saint didn't has food? Even though these are lies, how the river Goddess had given way to the Gopikas?"
Suka Yogi said, "Sri Krishna satisfied the desires of Gopikas. He didn't desire the sex with them. Hence, it is true that Sri Krishna has no touch with women. Similarly, the saint ate the food to satisfy the devotion of Gopikas. Hence, it is true that the saint didn't have food. In fact, intuition to do anything is more important than what had done."
By referring this concept, the coup makers and their supporters compared the immoral sex relations and extra marital sex relations to that of Gopikas and Sri Krishna. Nobody can enter into any body's mind and heart to find what his or her intuition is. There the coup played games. Actually, the intuition reflects in the further activities of people. It tells the truth in the due course of time. There the coup makers and their supporters played the game of నల్లమేక - నలుగురు దొంగలు i.e. BLACK GOAT AND FOUR THIEVES , to hide out the truth and to hijack the vision of Public on to other things.
Actually, in Sri Bhagavatham stories Sri Krishna satisfied the desires of Gopikas, in prior but in later he guided them to reach the philosophical peaks and to approach Mukthi. This was narrated in the story of Surya Grahanam i.e. solar eclipse. In fact, in this world, different types of people are there. There are some people with extreme desire. They don't think about any other thing, they won't hear any other thing unless they get satisfied their desire. We can observe this type of psychology in kids. When they desire a chocolate or ice cream, they won't hear whatever we say. They won't pay attention on our words, unless we give chocolate or ice cream to them according to their desire. After satisfying their desire, if we counsel them, they will try to understand what we are saying. After satisfying their desire, we can convince them to follow our way or good way. The MODERN CHILD PSYCHOLOGISTS and PSYCHIATRISTS are supporting this proceeger and prescribing this type of treatment. Sri Krishna also followed the same proceeger in case of Gopikas. But the coup makers and their supporters propagated the nasty critics on this concept in the part of their strategy. In case of Yashoda, Nanda also, Balarama and Sri Krishna never hurt their feelings and never neglected their parenthood. He sent Uddava to them and others time to time. At the time of solar eclipse, he spent with Yashoda, and Nanda, and he made them happy. Being the 'time being parents' of Sri Krishna, they had reached the spiritual and philosophical high levels and the level of idealism.
To explain the relation of Radha Krishna, I'm expressing my non-eligibility and incapacity, with obedience. The love of Radha Krishna, the concept of Radha Krishna had motivated too many devotional poets like Jayadeva who raised Bhakti Movement i.e. Devotional move. The coup makers and their supporters had used this story of Radha Krishna to implement the coup on Hinduism at their maximum level with the movement of HARE RAMA, HARE KRISHNA, hippies and ISKCON of Mayapur, Nawadweep District, West Bengal state where Sri Chatanya Pradhu born and started the Bhakti movement.
Under the coverage of Bakti movement i.e. Devotional Wave, by giving Narcotics, the youth was attracted towards Hare Rama Hare Krishna movement of ISKCON. This was highlighted by the then movie 'Hare Rama Hare Krishna' produced and acted by Devananda, the Hindi cinema hero, who migrated from Lahore, Pakistan at the time of greater India devotion into Bharath and Pakistan, with the song 'Dam Maro Dam', with the action of Jeenath Aman, the then half nude actress. With the court cases, the attention was drawn on that movie, so that it was populated like anything. The then media, so called intellectuals had helped to achieve popularity to Hare Rama Hare Krishna, i.e. Hippies at their level best through their coverage, and discussions. But no media, not any leading intellectuals of that time had efforted to educate the people, and to stop the coup of ISKCON on Indian culture and society. There was an open rumor that C.I.A. was behind ISKCON. There were some murders and killings happened in the premises of ISKCON at Mayapur like the happening of murders in Puttaparthi, Prasanthi Nilayam of Satya Sai Baba, now. From ISKCON to puttaparthi, truth won't come out even years passed. It is just like the case of Bala Krishna, the cinema hero, the son of N.T. Rama Rao who had shooted Bellam Konda Suresh, the producer of movies and another man with gun. Years passed, but truth was buried. At that time, the victims got cured and discharged from hospital but the person who attempted murder on them i.e. Mr. Bala Krishna didn't wake up from shack, so that he didn't discharged from CARE hospital. What a great treatment and management of Dr. Soma Raju, of CARE hospital!
To bury the truths like this, the media will work at its level best. Because, these types of incidents are all like small features in the coup on India and the coup makers are Mr. Ramoji Rao, a media man, C.I.A. and I.S.I.
In addition to this, these coup makers, and their supporters like media people, so-called intellectuals write essays in journals as the topics that, "Whether AcharyaRajaneesh 'under stood Krishna Tathwam or not?"
They made non-sense, and fun like this on Indian epics and Hinduism. By the way, strategically and successfully they made people to follow in the way, which the coup makers and their supporters had shown.
In ancient days, Indians believed the saints. They trusted whatever the saints said and tried to follow it, by thinking that the saints were more knowledgeous, having experience of observing so many parts of the country and had watched so many people. They trusted the saints and believed the words of Saints as truth. As well as the saints felt responsible to society. They tried to lead people in good way. They tried to guide people in righteous path. They tried to motivate people to think positively towards every one and everything.
In modern days, people believe the media. They are trusting the media. They are accepting that whatever the media projects as truth. They are treating the media as equivalent to the saints of ancient times, by thinking that the media is more knowledgeous, having experience and network of watching all over the world and people all over the world. This made the coup makers and their supporters, easy to implement their coup on public lives. It resembles to the idiom of Telugu as గొర్రె కసాయి వాడిని నమ్ముతుంది. Which means the sheep will trust the butcher.
That's all!
**********END*************
No comments:
Post a Comment